Generalization of motor learning based on multiple field exposures and local adaptation

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 3327-3338

  Malfait, Nicole ^a   Gribble, Paul L ^b   Ostry, David J ^a,c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c HASKINS LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT FUNCTION; LEARNING; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HAND; HUMANS; JOINTS; MALE; MOVEMENT; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TORQUE; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 19344376096     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00883.2004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. An K, Hui F, Morrey B, Linscheid R, and Chao E. Muscles across the elbow joint: a biomechanical analysis. J Biomech 14: 659-669, 1981.
2. An K, Kaufman K, and Chao E. Physiological considerations of muscle force through the elbow joint. J Biomech 22: 1249-1256, 1989.
3. Cardoso de Oliveira S. The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models. Acta Psychol 110: 139-159, 2002.
4. Conditt MA, Gandolfo F, and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. J Neurophysiol 78: 554-560, 1999.
5. Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Donchin O, Gazzaniga MS, and Shadmehr R. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. J Neurophysiol 1: 168-176, 2003.
6. DiZio P and Lackner JR. Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. J Neurophysiol 74: 1787-1792, 1995.
7. Doya K, Samejima K, Katagiri K, and Kawato M. Multiple model-based reinforcement learning. Neural Comput 14: 1347-1369, 2002.
8. Feldman AG. Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (λ model) for motor control. J Mot Behav 18: 17-54, 1986.
9. Feldman AG, Adamovich SV, Ostry DJ, and Flanagan JR. The origin of electromyograms - explanations based on the equilibrium point hypothesis. In: Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization, edited by Winters J and Woo S. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990, p. 195-213.
10. Flanagan JR, Nakano E, Imamizu H, Osu R, Yoshioka T, and Kawato M. Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments. J Neurosci 19: RC34, 1-5, 1999.
11. Ghahramani Z and Wolpert DM. Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning. Nature 386: 392-395, 1997.
12. Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, and Bizzi E. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 3843-3846, 1996.
13. Ghez C, Krakaurer JW, Sainburg RL, and Ghilardi M-F. Spatial representations and internal models of limb dynamics in motor learning. In: The New Cognitive Neurosciences, edited Gazzaniga MS. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2000, p. 501-514.
14. Goodbody SJ and Wolpert DM.Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. J Neurophysiol 79: 1825-1838, 1998.
15. Gribble PL and Ostry DJ. Compensation for loads during arm movements using equilibrium-point control. Exp Brain Res 135: 474-482, 2000.
16. Gribble PL, Ostry DJ, Sanguineti V, and Laboissiere R. Are complex control signals required for human arm movement? J Neurophysiol 79: 1409-1424, 1998.
17. Gribble PL and Scott SH. Overlap of internal models in motor cortex for mechanical loads during reaching. Nature 417: 938-941, 2002.
18. Haruno M, Wolpert DM, and Kawato M. MOSAIC model for sensorimotor learning and control. Neural Comput 13: 2201-2220, 2001.
19. Hollerbach J and Flash T. Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44: 67-77, 1982.
20. Hwang EJ, Donchin O, Smith MA, and Shadmehr R. A gain-field encoding of limb position and velocity in the internal model of arm dynamics. PLoS Biol 1: E25, 209-220, 2003.
21. Imamizu H, Uno Y, and Kawato M. Internal representations of the motor apparatus: implications from generalization in visuomotor learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21: 1174-1198, 1995.
22. Karniel A and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Exp Brain Res 143: 520-524, 2002.
23. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 718-727, 1999.
24. Malfait N and Ostry DJ. Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a "cognitive" response to the sudden introduction of load? J Neurosci 24: 8084-8089, 2004.
25. Malfait N, Shiller DM, and Ostry DJ. Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations. J Neurosci 22: 9656-9660, 2002.
26. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113, 1971.
27. Sainburg RL, Ghez C, and Kalakanis D. Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 81: 1045-1056, 1999.
28. Shadmehr R and Moussavi ZM. Spatial generalization from learning dynamic of reaching movements. J Neurosci 20: 7807-7815, 2000.
29. Shadmehr R and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
30. Swinnen SP and Wenderoth N. Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 18-25, 2004.
31. Thoroughman KA and Shadmehr R. Learning through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407: 742-747, 2000.
32. Wang J and Sainburg RL. Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. J Neurophysiol 92: 349-360, 2004.
33. Winters J and Woo S-Y. Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
34. Witney AG and Wolpert DM. Spatial representation of predictive motor learning. J Neurophysiol 89: 1837-1843, 2003.
35. Wolpert DM and Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks 11: 1317-1329, 1998.
36. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, and Kawato M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cognit Sci 2: 338-347, 1998.
37. Zajac F. Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 17: 359-415, 1989.