Motor control and learning in altered dynamic environments

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 653-659

  Lackner, James R ^a   DiZio, Paul ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADAPTATION; ARM MOVEMENT; CORIOLIS PHENOMENON; DYNAMICS; ENVIRONMENT; JAW MOVEMENT; LEARNING; LIMB MOVEMENT; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CONTROL; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; ROTATION; VELOCITY;

ANIMALS; CORIOLIS FORCE; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL;

EID: 27944451406     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.012     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. J.R. Lackner, and P. DiZio Gravitational, inertial, and Coriolis force influences on nystagmus, motion sickness, and perceived head trajectory A. Berthoz W. Graf P.P. Vidal The Head-Neck Sensory-Motor Symposium 1992 Oxford University Press 216 222
2. J.R. Lackner, and P. DiZio Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory J Neurophysiol 72 1994 299 313
3. E. Bizzi, N. Accornero, N. Chapple, and N. Hogan Arm trajectory formation in monkeys Exp Brain Res 46 1982 139 143
4. A.G. Feldman Once more for the equilibrium point hypothesis (λ model) J Mot Behav 18 1986 17 54
5. A.G. Feldman Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture. II. Controllable parameters of the muscles Biophysics 11 1966 565 578
6. P. DiZio, and J.R. Lackner Inertial Coriolis force perturbations of arm and head movements reveal common, non-vestibular mechanisms T. Mergner F. Hlavacka Multisensory control of posture 1995 Plenum Press 331 338
7. R. Shadmehr, and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task J Neurosci 14 1994 3208 3224
8. C.D. Takahashi, R.A. Scheidt, and D.J. Reinkensmeyer Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment J Neurophysiol 86 2001 1047 1051
9. Z. Ghahramani, and D.M. Wolpert Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning Nature 386 1997 392 395
10. P.R. Davidson, D.M. Wolpert, S.H. Scott, and J.R. Flanagan Common encoding of novel dynamic loads applied to the hand and arm J Neurosci 25 2005 5425 5429 Using a novel robotic device that can perturb individual arm segments, the authors demonstrate that dynamic loads applied to the hand or to the segments of the arm are encoded similarly despite different cutaneous inputs being associated with the separate contact areas. Arm dynamics independent of cutaneous contact are being represented.
11. R. Shadmehr, J. Brandt, and S. Corkin Time-dependent motor memory processes in amnesic subjects J Neurophysiol 80 1998 1590 1597
12. P.R. Davidson, and D.M. Wolpert Scaling down motor memories: de-adaptation after motor learning Neurosci Lett 370 2004 102 107 This study compares the rates of return to baseline reaching trajectories when, following adaptation to a robotic force field subjects are then exposed to a null field (de-activated robot), a scaled down version of the learned field, or a field in a novel direction. De-adaptation was quicker than adaptation to the scaled down field, which were both quicker than adapting to the novel direction. This evidence that we can scale down a learned compensation in certain situations rather than replace it with a new compensation helps to explain the ability to compensate for multiple contexts.
13. DiZio P, Frucht C, Lackner JR: Adaptation to a robotic force field does not transfer to free arm movements [abstract]. Soc Neurosci Abstr 2005, Prog No 989.6.
14. P. Pigeon, S.B. Bortolami, P. DiZio, and J.R. Lackner Coordinated turn and reach movements. I. Anticipatory compensation for self-generated Coriolis and interaction torques J Neurophysiol 89 2003 276 289
15. M.A. Conditt, F. Gandolfo, and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience J Neurophysiol 78 1997 554 560
16. R.L. Sainburg, C. Ghez, and D. Kalakanis Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms J Neurophysiol 81 1999 1045 1056
17. P. Jansen-Osmann, S. Richter, J. Konczak, and K.T. Kalveram Force adaptation transfers to untrained workspace regions in children: evidence for developing inverse dynamic motor models Exp Brain Res 143 2002 212 220
18. L.B. Bagesteiro, and R.L. Sainburg Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements J Neurophysiol 90 2003 1503 1513
19. J. Cohn, P. DiZio, and J.R. Lackner Reaching during virtual rotation: Context-specific compensation for expected Coriolis forces J Neurophysiol 83 2000 3230 3240
20. T. Wang, G.S. Dordevic, and R. Shadmehr Learning the dynamics of reaching movements results in the modification of arm impedance and long-latency perturbation responses Biol Cybern 85 2001 437 448
21. M.R. Hinder, and T.E. Milner Novel strategies in feedforward adaptation to a position-dependent perturbation Exp Brain Res 165 2005 239 249
22. E. Burdet, R. Osu, D.W. Franklin, T.E. Milner, and M. Kawato The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance Nature 414 2001 446 449
23. T. Hudson, J.R. Lackner, and P. DiZio Rapid motor adaptation of torso pointing movements to perturbations of the base of support Exp Brain Res 165 2005 283 293 The authors introduce a novel paradigm utilizing a servo-controlled platform for distorting the relationship between a subject's voluntary effort and body displacement relative to space. Rapid remappings occur. The results show that the sense of body displacement is represented in a foot-based rather than a vestibular reference system.
24. T. Mergner, C. Maurer, and R.J. Peterka A multisensory posture control model of human upright stance Prog Brain Res 142 2003 189 201
25. J.E. Roy, and K.E. Cullen Vestibuloocular reflex signal modulation during voluntary and passive head movements J Neurosci 87 2002 2337 2357
26. S. Tremblay, D.M. Shiller, and D.J. Ostry Somatosensory basis of speech production Nature 423 2003 866 869
27. I. Kurtzer, P. DiZio, and J.R. Lackner Task-dependent motor learning Exp Brain Res 153 2003 128 132
28. T. Brashers Krug, R. Shadmehr, and E. Bizzi Consolidation in human motor memory Nature 382 1996 252 255
29. G. Caithness, R. Osu, P. Bays, H. Chase, J. Klassen, M. Kawato, D.M. Wolpert, and J.R. Flanagan Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks J Neurosci 24 2004 8662 8671
30. R.C. Miall, N. Jenkinson, and K. Kulkarni Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference Exp Brain Res 154 2004 201 210
31. J.W. Krakauer, C. Ghez, and M.F. Ghilardi Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting J Neurosci 25 2005 473 478
32. C.G. Atkeson, and J.M. Hollerbach Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements J Neurosci 5 1985 2318 2330
33. O. Bock Load compensation in human goal-directed arm movements Behav Brain Res 41 1990 167 177
34. M. Haruno, D.M. Wolpert, and M. Kawato Mosaic model for sensorimotor learning and control Neural Comput 13 2001 2201 2220
35. D.M. Wolpert, and M. Kawato Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control Neural Netw 11 1998 1317 1329
36. D.M. Wolpert, K. Doya, and M. Kawato A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358 2003 593 602
37. H. Imamizu, T. Kuroda, T. Yoshioka, and M. Kawato Functional magnetic resonance imaging examination of two modular architectures for switching multiple internal models J Neurosci 24 2004 1173 1181
38. A. Karniel, and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment? Exp Brain Res 143 2002 520 524
39. M.A. Conditt, and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi Central representation of time during motor learning Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96 1999 11625 11630
40. R.A. Scheidt, J.B. Dingwell, and F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi Learning to move amid uncertainty J Neurophysiol 86 2001 971 985
41. O. Donchin, J.T. Francis, and R. Shadmehr Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: Theory and experiments in human motor control J Neurosci 23 2003 9032 9045
42. S.K. Wainscott, O. Donchin, and R. Shadmehr Internal models and contextual cues: encoding serial order and direction of movement J Neurophysiol 93 2004 786 800
43. B.T. Volpe, H.I. Krebs, and N. Hogan Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol 14 2001 745 752
44. J.R. Flanagan, E. Nakano, H. Imamizu, R. Osu, T. Yoshioka, and M. Kawato Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments J Neurosci 19 1999 RC34
45. I. Kurtzer, P. DiZio, and J.R. Lackner Adaptation to a novel multi-force perturbation Exp Brain Res 164 2005 120 132 The authors report a key demonstration that adaptation to a compound force field with simultaneous static and velocity-dependent components involves identification and individual representations of the two components.
46. I. Kurtzer, T.M. Herter, and S.H. Scott Random change in cortical load representation suggests distinct control of posture and movement Nature Neurosci 8 2005 498 504 A key issue in motor control is whether posture and movement are separately or conjointly represented. This paper points to distinct neuronal representations.
47. L.E. Sergio, C. Hamel-Paquet, and J.F. Kalaska Motor cortex neural correlates of output kinematics and kinetics during isometric-force and arm-reaching tasks J Neurophysiol 94 2005 2353 2378 A seminal paper concerning the neuronal representation in area M1 of kinematic and kinetic features of isometric and non-isometric movements. Previous work has indicated coding of simple force patterns, and this study demonstrates it for more complex force patterns arising in different types of naturalistic movements.
48. S.H. Scott Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching J Neurosci Methods 89 1999 119 127