Meta-analysis of single-subject experimental designs: Why now?

Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 117-119

  Schlosser, Ralf W ^a   Sigafoos, Jeff ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTISM; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA EXTRACTION; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SAMPLE SIZE; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 56549100762     PISSN: 17489539     EISSN: 17489547     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17489530802520429     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Beretvas, SN and Chung, H. (2008) A review of single-subject experimental design meta-analyses: Methodological issues and practice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, pp. 129-141.
2. Beretvas, SN and Chung, H. (2008) An evaluation of modified change-in-R2 effect size indices for single-subject experimental designs. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, pp. 120-128.
3. Horner, RH, Carr, EG, Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, SL and Wolery, M. (2005) The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, pp. 165-179.
4. Parker, RI, Hagan-Burke, S. and Vannest, K. (2007) Percentage of all non-overlapping data (PAND): An alternative to PND. Journal of Special Education, 40, pp. 194-204.
5. Pennington, L. (2005) Book review [Review of the book 'The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice']. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, pp. 99-102.
6. Schlosser, RW (2005) Meta-analysis of single-subject research: How should it be done?. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, pp. 375-378.
7. Schlosser, RW, Lee, DL and Wendt, O. (2008) Application of the Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, pp. 143-188.
8. Schneider, N., Goldstein, H. and Parker, R. (2008) Social skills interventions for children with autism: A meta-analytic application of PAND. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, pp. 152-162.
9. Straus, SE (2007) Evidence-based health care: Challenges and limitations. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, pp. 48-51.
10. Van den Noortgate, W and Onghena, P. (2008) A multilevel meta-analysis of single-subject experimental design studies. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, pp. 142-151.