Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 161-187

  Gennari, Silvia P ^a   MacDonald, Maryellen C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Constraint satisfaction; Object relative clauses; Reading comprehension; Thematic roles

Indexed keywords

EID: 38649091710     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Altmann G.T.M., and Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73 (1999) 247-264
2. Altmann G., and Steedman M. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30 (1988) 191-238
3. Baird R., and Koslick J.D. Recall of grammatical relations within clause-containing sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 3 (1974) 165-171
4. Belletti A., and Rizzi L. Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6 (1988) 291-352
5. Bock J.K., Loebell H., and Morey R. From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review 99 (1992) 150-171
6. Boland J.E. The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes 12 (1997) 423-484
7. Boland J.E., Tanenhaus M.K., Garnsey S.M., and Carlson G.N. Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 774-806
8. Caplan D., and Waters G.S. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999) 77-126
9. Chierchia G. Structured meanings, thematic roles and control. In: Chierchia G., Partee B.H., and Turner R. (Eds). Properties, types and meaning, II (1989), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 131-166
10. Chierchia G., and McConnell-Ginet S. Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
11. Clifton C., and Frazier L. Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In: Carlson G.N., and Tanenhaus M.K. (Eds). Linguistic structure in language processing (1989), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 273-317
12. Cupples L. The structural characteristics and on-line comprehension of experiencer-verb sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes 17 (2002) 125-162
13. Dowty D. On the semantic content of the notion of "thematic role". In: Chierchia G., Partee B.H., and Turner R. (Eds). Properties, types and meaning, II (1989), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 69-129
14. Dowty D. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67 (1991) 547-619
15. Ferreira F. Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1994) 715-736
16. Ferreira F., Christianson K., and Hollingworth A. Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30 (2001) 3-20
17. Ferretti T., McRae K., and Hatherell A. Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role. Journal of Memory and Language 44 (2001) 516-547
18. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS (2005), Sage Publications, London, UK
19. Ford M. A method of obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22 (1983) 203-218
20. Frazier L., and Clifton C. Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes 4 (1989) 93-126
21. Frazier L., and Fodor J.D. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6 (1978) 291-325
22. Frazier L., and Rayner K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 178-210
23. Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Linking production and comprehension of relative clauses. Paper presented at the 17th annual CUNY sentence processing conference.
24. Gibson E. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68 (1998) 1-76
25. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., and Johnson M. Memory Interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27 (2001) 1411-1423
26. Gordon P.C., Hendrick R., and Johnson M. Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language 51 (2004) 97-114
27. Grimshaw J.B. Argument structure (1990), MIT Press, Mass, Cambridge
28. Grodner D., and Gibson E. Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentential complexity. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 261-290
29. Grodner D., Gibson E., and Tunstall S. Syntactic complexity in ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 46 (2002) 267-295
30. Haegeman L. Introduction to government and binding theory (1991), Basil Blackwell, Oxford
31. Hale, J. (2001) A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In: Proceedings of NAACL, 2, pp. 159-166.
32. Hale J. Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science 30 (2006) 609-642
33. Jackendoff R. Semantic structures (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge
34. Jaeger, T .F. & Wasow, T. (2005). Processing as a source of accessibility effects on variation. In Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistic society, Berkeley Linguistic Society, Berkeley, CA.
35. Jurafsky D. Probabilistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In: Bod R., Hay J., and Jannedy S. (Eds). Probabilistic Linguistics (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
36. Just M.A., and Carpenter P.A. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99 (1992) 122-149
37. Kidd, E., Brandt, S., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses. Journal Language and Cognitive Processes. in press, doi:10.1080/01690960601155284.
38. King J., and Just M.A. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30 (1991) 580-602
39. Levin B., and Rappaport M. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17 (1986) 623-661
40. Levy, R. (2007) Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, in press, doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002.
41. Lewis R.L., and Vasishth S. An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science 29 (2005) 375-419
42. MacDonald M.C. The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language 32 (1993)
43. MacDonald M.C. Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 9 (1994) 157-201
44. MacDonald M.C. Distributional information in language comprehension, production, and acquisition: Three puzzles and a moral. In: MacWhinney B. (Ed). The emergence of language (1999), Erlbaum, Mahweh, NJ
45. MacDonald M.C., and Christiansen M.H. Reassessing working memory: Comments on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 109 (2002) 35-54
46. MacDonald M., Pearlmutter N., and Seidenberg M. Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101 (1994) 676-703
47. MacWhinney B. Starting points. Language 53 (1977) 152-187
48. MacWhinney B. Basic syntactic processes. In: Kuczaj S. (Ed). Language development: Syntax and semantics Vol. 1 (1982), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 73-136
49. MacWhinney B., and Pleh C. The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition 29 (1988) 95-141
50. Mak W.M., Vonk W., and Schriefers H. The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 50-68
51. Mak W.M., Vonk W., and Schriefers H. Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006) 466-490
52. McRae K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., and Tanenhaus M.K. Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 38 (1998) 283-312
53. Mitchell D.C., Cuetos F., Corley M.M.B., and Brysbaert M. Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24 (1995) 469-488
54. O'Grady W., Archibald J., Aronoff M., and Rees-Miller J. Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction. 4th ed. (2001), St. Martin's Press, Bedford
55. Pearlmutter N.J., and MacDonald M.C. Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 34 (1995) 521-542
56. Pickering M.J., and Traxler M.J. Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 (1998) 940-961
57. Race D.S., and MacDonald M.C. The use of "that" in the production and comprehension of object relative clauses. In: Alterman R., and Kirsh D. (Eds). 25th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 946-951
58. Reali F., and Christiansen M.H. Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language 57 (2007) 1-23
59. Roland D., Dick F., and Elman J.L. Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 57 (2007) 348-379
60. Saffran E.M., and Schwartz M.F. Impairments of sentence comprehension. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 346 (1994) 47-53
61. Sheldon A. The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13 (1974) 272-281
62. Spivey-Knowlton M., and Sedivy J.C. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition 55 (1995) 227-267
63. Tabor W., and Tanenhaus M.K. Dynamical models of sentence processing. Cognitive Science 23 (1999) 491-515
64. Tanenhaus M., Carlson G., and Trueswell J. The role of thematic structure in interpretation and parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 4 (1989) SI211-SI234
65. Tanenhaus M.K., and Trueswell J.C. Sentence comprehension. In: Miller J., and Eimas P.D. (Eds). Speech, language, and communication Vol. xviii (1995), Academic Press, San Diego, CA, US 217-262
66. Traxler M.J., and Pickering M.J. Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language. 35 (1996) 454-475
67. Traxler M.J., Morris R.K., and Seely R.E. Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 69-90
68. Traxler M.J., Williams R.S., Blozis S.A., and Morris R.K. Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language 53 (2005) 204-224
69. Trueswell J.C., and Tanenhaus M.K. Tense, temporal context and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 6 (1991) 303-338
70. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., and Kello C. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19 (1993) 528-553
71. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., and Garnsey S.M. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 33 (1994) 285-318
72. van Dyke J.A. Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 33 (2007) 330-407
73. van Dyke J.A., and Lewis R.L. Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language 49 (2003) 285-316
74. Wanner E., and Maratsos M. An ATN approach to comprehension. In: Halle M., Bresnan J., and Miller G.A. (Eds). Linguistic Theory and psychological reality (1978), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 119-161
75. Warren T., and Gibson E. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition 85 (2002) 79-112
76. Waters G.S., and Caplan D. Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences. Memory and Cognition 24 (1996) 342-355
77. Waters G.S., and Caplan D. The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: Critique of Just and Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review 103 (1996) 761-772
78. Waters G., Caplan D., and Hildebrandt N. Working memory and written sentence comprehension. In: Coltheart M. (Ed). Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, England 531-555
79. Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., & Race, D. S. (2006). Experience and sentence comprehension: Statistical learning, working memory, and individual differences. Unpublished article, University of Wisconsin-Madison.