Patterns of divergence among conifer ESTs and polymorphism in Pinus sylvestris identify putative selective sweeps

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 2567-2577

  Palmé, Anna E ^a,b   Wright, Mark ^c   Savolainen, Outi ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology

Author keywords

Candidate genes; dn ds; Ka Ks; Pinus sylvestris; Scots pine; Selection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONIFER; EVOLUTION; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT GENETICS; SCOTS PINE; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE;

EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENOME, PLANT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC;

CONIFEROPHYTA; EMBRYOPHYTA; PICEA GLAUCA; PINUS PINASTER; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; PINUS TAEDA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

EID: 56449109597     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn194     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adams EJ, Stewart C, Glenys T, Parham P, Adams E. 2000. Common chimpanzees have greater diversity than humans at two of the three highly polymorphic mhc class I genes. Immunogenetics. 51:410-424.
2. Akashi H. 1999. Inferring the fitness effects of DNA mutations from polymorphism and divergence data: statistical power to detect directional selection under stationarity and free recombination. Genetics. 151:221-238.
3. Andolfatto P. 2007. Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Res. 17:1755-1762.
4. Awadalla P, Charlesworth D. 1999. Recombination and selection at Brassica self-incompatibility loci. Genetics. 152:413-425.
5. Barrier M, Bustamante CD, Yu J, Purugganan MD. 2003. Selection on rapidly evolving proteins in the Arabidopsis genome. Genetics. 163:723-733.
6. Biswas S, Akey JM. 2006. Genomic insights into positive selection. Trends Genet. 22:437-446.
7. Bonin A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, Pompanon F. 2006. Explorative genome scan to detect candidate loci for adaptation along a gradient of altitude in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Mol Biol Evol. 23:773-783.
8. Borrelli L, De Stasio R, Filosa S, Parisi E, Riggio M, Scudiero R, Trinchella F. 2006. Evolutionary fate of duplicate genes encoding aspartic proteinases. Nothepsin case study. Gene. 368:101-109.
9. Braverman JM, Hudson RR, Kaplan NL, Langley CH, Stephan W. 1995. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 140:783-796.
10. Buckling A, Rainey PB. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a bacteriophage. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 269:931-936.
11. Carginale V, Trinchella F, Capasso C, Scudiero R, Riggio M, Parisi E. 2004. Adaptive evolution and functional divergence of pepsin gene family. Gene. 333:81-90.
12. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D. 1993. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 134:1289-1303.
13. Charlesworth D. 2006. Balancing selection and its effects on sequences in nearby genome regions. PLoS Genetics. 2:e64.
14. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B, Morgan MT. 1995. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics. 141:1619-1632.
15. Cheddadi R, Vendramin GG, Litt T, et al. (12 co-authors). 2006. Imprints of glacial refugia in the modern genetic diversity of Pinus sylvestris. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 15:271-282.
16. Dvornyk V, Sirviö A, Mikkonen M, Savolainen O. 2002. Low nucleotide diversity at the pal1 locus in the widely distributed Pinus sylvestris. Mol Biol Evol. 19:179-188.
17. Fay JC, Wu C-I. 2000. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 155:1405-1413.
18. Garcia-Gil MR, Mikkonen M, Savolainen O. 2003. Nucleotide diversity at two phytochrome loci along a latitudinal cline in Pinus sylvestris. Mol Ecol. 12:1195-1206.
19. Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Ersoz E, Brown GR, Wheeler NC, Neale DB. 2006. DNA sequence variation and selection of tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms at candidate genes for drought-stress response in Pinus taeda L. Genetics. 172:1915-1926.
20. Grotkopp E, Rejmanek M, Sanderson M, Rost T. 2004. Evolution of genome size in pines (Pinus) and its life-history correlates: supertree analyses. Evolution. 58: 1705-1729.
21. Guillet-Claude C, Isabel N, Pelgas B, Bousquet J. 2004. The evolutionary implications of knox-I gene duplications in conifers: correlated evidence from phylogeny, gene mapping, and analysis of functional divergence. Mol Biol Evol. 21:2232-2245.
22. Hall T. 1999. Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 41:95-98.
23. Hedrick PW, Lee RN, Garrigan D. 2002. Major histocompatibility complex variation in red wolves: evidence for common ancestry with coyotes and balancing selection. Mol Ecol. 11:1905-1913.
24. Heuertz M, De Paoli E, Källman T, Larsson H, Jurman I, Morgante M, Lascoux M, Gyllenstrand N. 2006. Multilocus patterns of nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium and demographic history of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) karst]. Genetics. 174:2095-2105.
25. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL. 1988. The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination. Genetics. 120:831-840.
26. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL. 1995. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics. 141:1605-1617.
27. Hudson RR, Kreitman M, Aguade M. 1987. A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics. 116:153-159.
28. Kaplan NL, Hudson RR, Langley CH. 1989. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 123:887-899.
29. Macpherson JM, Sella G, Davis JC, Petrov DA. 2007. Genomewide spatial correspondence between nonsynonymous divergence and neutral polymorphism reveals extensive adaptation in Drosophila. Genetics. 177:2083-2099.
30. Nordborg M. 2001. Coalescent theory. In: Balding D, Bishop M, Cannings C, editors. Handbook of statistical genetics. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 179-212.
31. Pamilo P, Bianchi N. 1993. Evolution of the Zfx and Zfy genes: rates and interdependence between the genes. Mol Biol Evol. 10:271-281.
32. Przeworski M. 2002. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics. 160:1179-1189.
33. Pyhäjärvi T, García-Gil MR, Knürr T, Mikkonen M, Wachowiak W, Savolainen O. 2007. Demographic history has influenced nucleotide diversity in European Pinus sylvestris populations. Genetics. 177:1713-1724.
34. Pyhäjärvi T, Salmela MJ, Savolainen O. 2008. Colonization routes of Pinus sylvestris inferred from distribution of mitochondrial DNA variation. Tree Genet Genomes. 4:247-254.
35. Ramos-Onsins SE, Mitchell-Olds T. 2007. Mlcoalsim: multilocus coalescent simulations. Evol Bioinform. 2:41-44.
36. Roth C, Liberles DA. 2006. A systematic search for positive selection in higher plants (Embryophytes). BMC Plant Biol. 6:12.
37. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R. 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 19:2496-2497.
38. Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T. 2007. Genomic diversity in forest trees. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 10:162-167.
39. Schaeffer S. 2002. Molecular population genetics of sequence length diversity in the Adh region of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genet Res. 80:163-175.
40. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L. 2000. Arlequin ver. 2000: a software for population genetics data analysis. Geneva (Switzerland): University of Geneva.
41. Simonsen KL, Churchill GA, Aquadro CF. 1995. Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data. Genetics. 141:413-429.
42. Sinclair WT, Morman JD, Ennos RA. 1999. The postglacial history of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Western Europe: evidence from mitochondrial DNA variation. Mol Ecol. 8:83-88.
43. Slotte T. 2007. Evolution of flowering time in the tetraploid Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae). Uppsala (Sweden): Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis, Uppsala University.
44. Swanson WJ, Clark AG, Waldrip-Dail HM, Wolfner MF, Aquadro CF. 2001. Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:7375-7379.
45. Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 123:585-595.
46. Thompson J, Gibson T, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins D. 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:4876-4882.
47. Thomson G. 1977. The effect of a selected locus on linked neutral loci. Genetics. 85:753-788.
48. Tiffin P, Hahn MW. 2002. Coding sequence divergence between two closely related plant species: Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica rapa ssp. Pekinensis. J Mol Evol. 54:746-753.
49. Vasemägi A, Nilsson J, Primmer CR. 2005. Expressed sequence tag-linked microsatellites as a source of gene-associated polymorphisms for detecting signatures of divergent selection in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Mol Biol Evol. 22:1067-1076.
50. Wang X-Q, Tank DC, Sang T. 2000. Phylogeny and divergence times in Pinaceae: evidence from three genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 17:773-781.
51. Werner JD, Borevitz JO, Uhlenhaut NH, Ecker JR, Chory J, Weigel D. 2005. Frigida-independent variation in flowering time of natural Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Genetics. 170:1197-1207.
52. Yang Z. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 13: 555-556.