Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 102-119

  Amazeen, Eric L ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TOUCH;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION; STEREOGNOSIS; TOUCH; WEIGHT PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033069322     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.102     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Amazeen, E. L. (1997). The effects of volume on perceived heaviness by dynamic touch: With and without vision. Ecological Psychology, 9, 245-263.
2. Amazeen, E. L., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 213-232.
3. Anderson, N. H. (1970). Averaging model applied to the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 1-4.
4. Anderson, N. H. (1972). Cross-task validation of functional measurement. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 389-395.
5. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (1991). A response-time theory of perceptual independence. In J. P. Doignon & J. C. Falmagne (Eds.), Mathematical psychology: Current developments (pp. 389-414). New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
7. Bingham, G. P., Schmidt, R. C., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1989). Hefting for a maximum distance throw: A smart perceptual mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 507-528.
8. Carello, C., Fitzpatrick, P., Flascher, I., & Turvey, M. T. (1998). Inertial eigenvalues, rod density, and rod diameter in length perception by dynamic touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 89-100.
9. Charpentier, A. (1891). Analyse experimentale de quelques elements de la sensation de poids [Experimental study of some aspects of weight perception]. Archives de Physiologie Normales et Pathologiques, 3, 122-135.
10. Ellis, R. T., & Lederman, S. J. (1993). The role of haptic vs. visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 315-324.
11. Fienberg, S. E. (1980). The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Fitzpatrick, P., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the "muscular sense." Neuroscience, 60, 551-568.
13. Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
14. Garner, W. R., & McGill, W. J. (1956). The relation between information and variance analyses. Psychometrika, 21, 219-228.
15. Garner, W. R., & Morton, J. (1969). Perceptual independence: Definitions, models, and experimental paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 233-259.
16. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Goldstein, H. (1980). Classical mechanics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19. Goodale, M. A. (1994). Visual pathways supporting perception and action in the primate cerebral cortex. In K. H. Pribram (Ed.), Origins: Brain and self-organization (pp. 585-592). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
21. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
22. Heft, H. (1993). A methodological note on overestimates of reaching distance: Distinguishing between perceptual and analytical judgments. Ecological Psychology, 5, 255-271.
23. Hoisington, L. P. (1920). On the non-visual perception of the length of lifted rods. American Journal of Psychology, 31, 114-146.
24. Jones, L. A. (1986). Perception of force and weight: Theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 29-42.
25. Kibble, T. W. B. (1985). Classical mechanics. London: Longman.
26. Loomis, J. M., & Lederman, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 31.1-31.41). New York: Wiley.
27. McGill, W. J. (1954). Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika, 19, 97-116.
28. Miller, G. A. (1955). Note on the bias of information estimates. In H. Quastler (Ed.), Information theory in psychology (pp. 95-100). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
29. Miller, G. A., & Madow, W. G. (1954). On the maximum likelihood estimate of the Shannon-Wiener measure of information (Report AFCRC-TR-54-75). Operational Applications Laboratory, ARDC.
30. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1993). Visual pathways to perception and action. In T. P. Hicks, S. Molotchnikoff, & T. Ono (Eds.), The visually responsive neuron: From basic neurophysiology to behavior (pp. 317-338). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
31. Mood, A. M., Graybill, F. A., & Boes, D. C. (1974). Introduction to the theory of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Pagano, C. C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Exteroception and exproprioception by dynamic touch are different functions of the inertia tensor. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1191-1202.
33. Pagano, C. C., Fitzpatrick, P., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Tensorial basis to the constancy of perceived object extent over variations of dynamic touch. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 43-54.
34. Pagano, C. C., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Perceiving by dynamic touch the distances reachable with irregular objects. Ecological Psychology, 5, 125-151.
35. Pagano, C. C., & Turvey, M. T. (1995). The inertia tensor as a basis for the perception of limb orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1070-1087.
36. Flackert, R. L. (1974). The analysis of categorical data. London: Charles Griffin.
37. Quastler, H. (1955). Information theory in psychology: Problems and methods. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
38. Reed, C. L. (1994). Perceptual dependence for shape and texture during haptic processing. Perception, 23, 349-366.
39. Ross, H. E., & Gregory, R. L. (1970). Weight illusions and weight discrimination - A revised hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 318-328.
40. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656.
41. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
42. Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
43. Solomon, H. Y., & Turvey, M. T. (1988). Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 404-427.
44. Solomon, H. Y., Turvey, M. T., & Burton, G. (1989a). Gravitational and muscular variables in perceiving extent by wielding. Ecological Psychology, 1, 256-300.
45. Solomon, H. Y., Turvey, M. T., & Burton, G. (1989b). Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: Haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 58-68.
46. Stevens, S. S. (1960). The psychophysics of sensory function. American Scientist, 48, 226-252.
47. Stevens, S.S. (1962). The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics. American Psychologist, 17, 29-39.
48. Stevens, S. S. (1970). Neural events and the psychophysical law. Science, 170, 1043-1050.
49. Symon, K. (1971). Mechanics. New York: Addison-Wesley.
50. Turvey, M. T., Burton, G., Amazeen, E. L., Butwill, M., & Carello, C. (1998). Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 35-48.
51. Turvey, M. T., & Carello, C. (1995a). Dynamical themes in perception and action. In R. F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 373-401). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Turvey, M. T., & Carello, C. (1995b). Dynamic touch. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. V. Perception of space and motion (pp. 401-490). San Diego: Academic Press.
53. Weber, E. H. (1978). The sense of touch (H. E. Ross, Ed. and Trans.). London: Academic Press. (Original work published 1834)
54. Williams, D. A. (1976). Improved likelihood ratio tests for complete contingency tables. Biometrika, 63, 33-37.