Lieb-Schultz-Mattis theorem for quasitopological systems

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 17, 2008, Pages

  Freedman, Michael ^a   Nayak, Chetan ^a   Shtengel, Kirill ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56349123244     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.174411     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. X. G. Wen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10.1142/S0217979290000139 4, 239 (1990).
2. S. Das Sarma and A. Pinczek, Perspectives in Quantum Hall Effects: Novel Quantum Liquids in Low-Dimensional Semiconductor Structures (Wiley, New York, 1997).
3. P. W. Anderson, Science 10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 235, 1196 (1987).
4. S. A. Kivelson, D. S. Rokhsar, and J. P. Sethna, Phys. Rev. B 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.8865 35, 8865 (1987).
5. N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1773 66, 1773 (1991).
6. L. Balents, M. P. A. Fisher, and C. Nayak, Phys. Rev. B 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.6307 61, 6307 (2000).
7. T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.7850 62, 7850 (2000).
8. R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.2677 60, 2677 (1988).
9. Y. Chen, F. Wilczek, E. Witten, and B. Halperin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10.1142/S0217979289000725 3, 1001 (1989).
10. A. Y. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0 303, 2 (2003).
11. M. H. Freedman, M. J. Larsen, and Z. Wang, Commun. Math. Phys. 10.1007/s002200200645 227, 605 (2002).
12. M. Freedman, C. Nayak, K. Shtengel, K. Walker, and Z. Wang, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 10.1016/j.aop.2004.01.006 310, 428 (2004).
13. M. Freedman, C. Nayak, and K. Shtengel, arXiv:cond-mat/0309120 (unpublished).
14. M. Freedman, C. Nayak, and K. Shtengel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.147205 94, 147205 (2005).
15. M. H. Freedman, Commun. Math. Phys. 10.1007/s00220-002-0785-1 234, 129 (2003).
16. S. A. Trugman and S. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.5280 31, 5280 (1985).
17. F. D. M. Haldane, in The Quantum Hall Effect, 2nd ed., edited by, R. E. Prange, and, S. M. Girvin, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990), Chap..
18. C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, J. Math. Phys. 10.1063/1.1664978 10, 1388 (1969).
19. D. J. Klein, J. Phys. A 10.1088/0305-4470/15/2/032 15, 661 (1982).
20. I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.799 59, 799 (1987).
21. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 10.1016/0003-4916(61)90115-4 16, 407 (1961).
22. A multiloop is a collection of nonintersecting loops and arcs on a surface. The end points of an arc are required to lie on the boundary of the surface, see Ref..
23. L. Kauffman and S. Lins, Temperley Lieb Recoupling Theory and Invariants of 3-Manifolds, Annals of Mathematics Studies Vol. 134 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994).
24. See Ref. where private communication with A. Kitaev and G. Kuperberg is referenced. The required family of commuting projectors is easily derived in the Turaev-Viro approach (Ref.) by writing surface×interval, Σ×I=handle -body union 2-handles. The disjoint attaching curves of the 2-handles yield the commuting projectors.
25. Here we use the term "frustration" in reference to a Hamiltonian which can be written as a sum of projectors yet has no zero modes. In this sense, new terms breaking the extensive degeneracy down to a crystalline structure will introduce frustration.
26. R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1395 50, 1395 (1983).
27. We stress that this is a term-by-term correspondence in the sense that, given the appropriate basis, the squared amplitudes of the basis states comprising the ground state are identical to the Gibbs weights of the corresponding statistical mechanical states (up to an overall constant).
28. D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 61.2376 61, 2376 (1988).
29. R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86. 1881 86, 1881 (2001).
30. G. Misguich, D. Serban, and V. Pasquier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137202 89, 137202 (2002).
31. C. L. Henley, J. Stat. Phys. 89, 483 (1997).
32. C. L. Henley, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10.1088/0953-8984/16/11/045 16, S891 (2004).
33. C. Castelnovo, C. Chamon, C. Mudry, and P. Pujol, Phys. Rev. B 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.104405 72, 104405 (2005).
34. C. Castelnovo, C. Chamon, C. Mudry, and P. Pujol, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 10.1016/j.aop.2005.01.006 318, 316 (2005).
35. M. Freedman, C. Nayak, and K. Shtengel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.066401 94, 066401 (2005).
36. In a fully packed case, there is an additional geometric constraint limiting these winding numbers to either only even or only odd, depending on the size of the torus.
37. C. M. Fortuin and P. W. Kasteleyn, Physica (Amsterdam) 10.1016/0031-8914(72)90045-6 57, 536 (1972).
38. This derivation can be made slightly more formal if one defines a joint measure on both spin and bond configurations: μ (σ,ω) = vb (ω) Δ (σ,ω). This is known as Edwards-Sokal measure (Ref.). As follows from Eq. 12, when traced over both spins and bond occupations, it gives the desired partition function. Its marginal with respect to bond configurations is the Gibbs weight for spins, while its marginal with respect to spin configurations defines the weight for random clusters.
39. It is also known as a cyclomatic number and for the case of a planar graph is equal to the number of finite faces (Ref.).
40. R. J. Baxter, S. B. Kelland, and F. Y. Wu, J. Phys. A 10.1088/0305-4470/9/3/009 9, 397 (1976).
41. C. M. Fortuin, P. W. Kasteleyn, and J. Ginibre, Commun. Math. Phys. 10.1007/BF01651330 22, 89 (1971).
42. M. Aizenman, J. T. Chayes, L. Chayes, and C. M. Newman, J. Stat. Phys. 10.1007/BF01022985 50, 1 (1988).
43. G. R. Grimmett, Percolation, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999).
44. J. T. Chayes, A. L. Puha, and T. D. Sweet, in Probability Theory and Applications, IAS/Park City Mathematics Series Vol. 6, edited by, E. Hsu, and, S. R. S. Varadhan, (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1999), pp. 49-166, http://www.cts.cuni.cz/kotecky/seminars/spring/percnotes.ps
45. E. Domany, D. Mukamel, B. Nienhuis, and A. Schwimmer, Nucl. Phys. 10.1016/0550-3213(81)90559-9 190, 279 (1981).
46. B. Nienhuis, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by, C. Domb, and, J. L. Lebowitz, (Academic, London, 1987), Vol. 11, pp. 1-53.
47. V. G. Turaev and O. Y. Viro, Topology 10.1016/0040-9383(92)90015-A 31, 865 (1992).
48. M. B. Hastings, Phys. Rev. B 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.104431 69, 104431 (2004).
49. M. B. Hastings, Europhys. Lett. 10.1209/epl/i2005-10046-x 70, 824 (2005).
50. E. Ardonne, P. Fendley, and E. Fradkin, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 10.1016/j.aop.2004.01.004 310, 493 (2004).
51. O. Schramm (private communication).
52. H. Yin and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2058 86, 2058 (2001).
53. H. Yin and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. E 10.1103/PhysRevE.65.036119 65, 036119 (2002).
54. D. Das, J. Kondev, and B. Chakraborty, arXiv:cond-mat/0112281 (unpublished).
55. C. Chamon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.040402 94, 040402 (2005).
56. M. H. Freedman, Found Comput. Math. 1, 183 (2001). 10.1007/s102080010006
57. V. G. Turaev, Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1994).
58. R. G. Edwards and A. D. Sokal, Phys. Rev. D 10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2009 38, 2009 (1988).
59. J. W. Essam and M. E. Fisher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 10.1103/RevModPhys.42.272 42, 272 (1970).