Extended Hubbard model with ring exchange: A route to a non-abelian topological phase

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2005, Pages

  Freedman, Michael ^a   Nayak, Chetan ^a,b   Shtengel, Kirill ^a  

^a MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUBBARD MODEL; NON-ABELIAN TOPOLOGICAL PHASE; QUANTUM DIMER MODEL; RING EXCHANGES;

FERMIONS; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; QUANTUM THEORY;

TOPOLOGY;

EID: 18144365477     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.066401     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559 (1982).
2. S. Das Sarma and A. Pinczek, Perspectives in Quantum Hall Effects: Novel Quantum Liquids in Law-Dimensional Semiconductor Structures (Wiley, New York, 1997).
3. P. W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987).
4. S. A. Kivelson, D. S. Rokhsar, and J. P. Sethna, Phys. Rev. B 35, 8865 (1987); D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2376 (1988).
5. S. A. Kivelson, D. S. Rokhsar, and J. P. Sethna, Phys. Rev. B 35, 8865 (1987); D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2376 (1988).
6. V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2095 (1987); R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2677 (1988); Science 242, 525 (1988); A. Fetter, C. Hanna, and R. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9679 (1989); Y. Chen, F. Wilczek, E. Witten, and B. Halperin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 3, 1001 (1989).
7. V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2095 (1987); R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2677 (1988); Science 242, 525 (1988); A. Fetter, C. Hanna, and R. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9679 (1989); Y. Chen, F. Wilczek, E. Witten, and B. Halperin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 3, 1001 (1989).
8. V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2095 (1987); R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2677 (1988); Science 242, 525 (1988); A. Fetter, C. Hanna, and R. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9679 (1989); Y. Chen, F. Wilczek, E. Witten, and B. Halperin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 3, 1001 (1989).
9. V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2095 (1987); R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2677 (1988); Science 242, 525 (1988); A. Fetter, C. Hanna, and R. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9679 (1989); Y. Chen, F. Wilczek, E. Witten, and B. Halperin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 3, 1001 (1989).
10. V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2095 (1987); R. B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2677 (1988); Science 242, 525 (1988); A. Fetter, C. Hanna, and R. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9679 (1989); Y. Chen, F. Wilczek, E. Witten, and B. Halperin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 3, 1001 (1989).
11. N. Read and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. B 40, 7133 (1989); N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1773 (1991); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 219 (1991).
12. N. Read and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. B 40, 7133 (1989); N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1773 (1991); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 219 (1991).
13. N. Read and B. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. B 40, 7133 (1989); N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1773 (1991); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 219 (1991).
14. X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 44, 2664 (1991).
15. C. Mudry and E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. B 49, 5200 (1994).
16. L. Balents, M. P. A. Fisher, and C. Nayak, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 12, 1033 (1998); T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 62, 7850 (2000).
17. L. Balents, M. P. A. Fisher, and C. Nayak, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 12, 1033 (1998); T. Senthil and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 62, 7850 (2000).
18. R. Moessner and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1881 (2001).
19. L. Balents, M. P. A. Fisher, and S. M. Girvin, Phys. Rev. B 65, 224412 (2002).
20. T. Senthil and O. Motrunich, Phys. Rev. B 66, 205104 (2002); O. I. Motrunich and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 277004 (2002).
21. T. Senthil and O. Motrunich, Phys. Rev. B 66, 205104 (2002); O. I. Motrunich and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 277004 (2002).
22. R. Willett, J. P. Eisenstein, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, A. C. Gossard, and J. H. English, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1776 (1987); W. Pan, J.-S. Xia, V. Shvarts, D. E. Adams, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3530 (1999).
23. R. Willett, J. P. Eisenstein, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, A. C. Gossard, and J. H. English, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1776 (1987); W. Pan, J.-S. Xia, V. Shvarts, D. E. Adams, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3530 (1999).
24. G. Moore and N. Read, Nucl. Phys. B360, 362 (1991).
25. M. Greiter, X. G. Wen, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B374, 567 (1992).
26. C. Nayak and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B479, 529 (1996); N. Read and E. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 54, 16864 (1996); E. Fradkin, C. Nayak, A. Tsvelik, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B516, 704 (1998).
27. C. Nayak and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B479, 529 (1996); N. Read and E. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 54, 16864 (1996); E. Fradkin, C. Nayak, A. Tsvelik, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B516, 704 (1998).
28. C. Nayak and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B479, 529 (1996); N. Read and E. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 54, 16864 (1996); E. Fradkin, C. Nayak, A. Tsvelik, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B516, 704 (1998).
29. A. Y. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 303, 2 (2003).
30. M. H. Freedman, Found. Comput. Math, 1, 183 (2001).
31. L. Kauffman and S. Lins, Temperley Lieb Recoupling Theory and Invariants of 3-Manifolds, Annals of Mathematical Studies Vol. 134 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994).
32. M. H. Freedman, Commun. Math. Phys. 234, 129 (2003).
33. M. Freedman, C. Nayak, and K. Shtengel, cond-mat/0408257.
34. M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T.W. Hansch, and I. Bloch, Nature (London) 415, 39 (2002).
35. L. B. Ioffe, M. Feigel'man, V. A. Ioselevich, D. Ivanov, M. Troyer, and G. Blatter, Nature (London) 415, 503 (2002).
36. M. Freedman, C. Nayak, K. Shtengel, K. Walker, and Z. Wang, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 310, 428 (2004).
37. M. H. Freedman, M. J. Larsen, and Z. Wang, Commun. Math. Phys. 227, 605 (2002); 228, 177 (2002).
38. M. H. Freedman, M. J. Larsen, and Z. Wang, Commun. Math. Phys. 227, 605 (2002); 228, 177 (2002).
39. M. Freedman, C. Nayak, and K. Shtengel, cond-mat/0309120.
40. M. Roger, Phys. Rev. B 30, 6432 (1984).
41. C. Herring, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 631 (1962).
42. A. H. MacDonald, S. M. Girvin, and D. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. B 37, 9753 (1988).
43. D. J. Thouless, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 86, 893 (1965).
44. S. Chakravarty, S. Kivelson, C. Nayak, and K. Voelker, Philos. Mag. B 79, 859 (1999); K. Voelker and S. Chakravarty, Phys. Rev. B 64, 235125 (2001).
45. S. Chakravarty, S. Kivelson, C. Nayak, and K. Voelker, Philos. Mag. B 79, 859 (1999); K. Voelker and S. Chakravarty, Phys. Rev. B 64, 235125 (2001).
46. It is important that the lattice is not bipartite. On the edges of a bipartite lattice, our models have an additional, undesired, conserved quantity (integral winding numbers, which are inconsistent with the JW projectors), so the triangular lattice gives the simplest realization.
47. B. Sutherland, Phys. Rev. B 37, 3786 (1988).
48. D. Jetchev (private communication). For a rigorous proof of ergodicity in a similar setting see C. Kenyon and E. Rernila, Discrete Math. 152, 191 (1996).
49. D. Jetchev (private communication). For a rigorous proof of ergodicity in a similar setting see C. Kenyon and E. Rernila, Discrete Math. 152, 191 (1996).