Financial analysis of project delivery systems: Road projects' operational performance data revisited

VTT Tiedotteita - Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus

Volumn , Issue 2445, 2008, Pages 3-58

  Lahdenperä, Pertti ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cost comparison; Financial analysis; Project delivery systems; Project finance; Road management; Road procurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 56249132159     PISSN: 12350605     EISSN: 14550865     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. AECOM. 2006. Design-Build Effectiveness Study. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
2. Alhazmi, T. and McCaffer, R. 2000. Project Procurement System Selection Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(3), 176-184.
3. Bank of Finland. 2006. Economic Outlook. Bank of Finland Bulletin, 80(3).
4. Bennett, J., Pothecary, E. and Robinson, G. 1996. Designing and Building a world-class industry. Centre for Strategic Studies in Construction, The University of Reading.
5. Bliss, N. 2007. Basel II: capital management strategies for project finance loans. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Briefing, February 2007.
6. Committee of Public Accounts. 2003. Delivering better value for money from the Private Finance Initiative. Twenty-eighth Report of Session 2002-03. House of Commons, London.
7. Construction Industry Council. 2000. The role of cost saving and innovation in PFI projects. Thomas Telford, London.
8. rd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
9. Dorsey, R. W. 1997. Project Delivery Systems for Building Construction. Associated General Contractors of America, Washington, DC.
10. Eaton, D., Akbiyikli, R. and Dickinson, M. 2006. An evaluation of the stimulants and impediments to innovation within PFI/PPP projects. Construction Innovation, 6(2), 63-77.
11. Ernzen, J., Williams, R. and Brisk, D. 2004. Design-Build vs. Design-Bid-Build: Comparing Cost and Schedule. Transportation Research Board, Annual Meeting 2004, Washington, DC.
12. Esty, B. 2004. Glossary of project finance terms and acronyms. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston.
13. Fama, E. and French, K. 2001. The Equity Premium. Working paper No. 522. University of Chicago, The Center for Research in Security Prices, Chicago.
14. Finnerty, J. 1996. Project Financing. Asset-Based Financial Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
15. Finnish Companies Act 2006/624. 2006. Edita, Helsinki.
16. Finnish Road Administration. 2003. Procurement strategy of the Finnish Road Administration. Edita, Helsinki.
17. Finnish Road Administration. 2006. Cost comparison of E18 Muurla-Lohja life cycle project, Jan 21, 2006 (in Finnish) 〈http://www.tiehallinto.fi/ 〉 (Dec. 13, 2006).
18. Graham, J. and Harvey, C. 2005. The long-run equity risk premium. Finance Research Letters 2, 185-194. (Pubitemid 41722613)
19. Grimsey, D. and Lewis, M. 2005. Are Public Private Partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views. Accounting Forum, 29, 345-378. (Pubitemid 41483053)
20. Grout, P. 1997. The economics of the private finance initiative. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13(4), 53-66. (Pubitemid 28184346)
21. Hall, M., Holt, R. and Graves, A. 2000. Private finance, public roads: configuring the supply chain in PFI highway construction. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6, 227-235.
22. HM Treasury. 2004. Value for Money Assessment Guidance. HM Treasury, London.
23. HM Treasury. 2006. PFI: Strengthening long-term partnership. HM Treasury, London.
24. Jaffe, A. J. and Sirmans, C. F. 2001. Fundamentals of real estate investment. 3rd ed. South-Western, Mason.
25. Kaleva, H. and Leiwo, K. 2006. Economic evaluation principles and analyses for life cycle models. KTI Property Information, Helsinki. (In Finnish.)
26. Kerr, M. 2006. Building Flexibility. New Delivery Models for Public Infrastructure Projects. Mondaq Business Briefing, March 14, 2006.
27. Klein, M. 1997. The risk premium for evaluating public projects. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13(4), 29-42.
28. Koppinen, T. and Lahdenperä, P. 2004a. Road sector experiences on project delivery methods. VTT Research Notes 2260. VTT, Espoo. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2004/T2260.pdf.
29. Koppinen, T. and Lahdenperä, P. 2004b. The current and future performance of road project delivery methods. VTT Publications 549. VTT, Espoo. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2004/P549.pdf.
30. Koppinen, T. and Lahdenperä, P. 2007. Realized economic efficiency of road project delivery systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 13(4), 321-329. (Pubitemid 350162791)
31. Law on taxation of business income 360/1968. 2006. Edita, Helsinki. (In Finnish.)
32. Lehtinen, M. (ed.) 2005. Public-private partnerships in provision of office and infrastructure services. Efeko, Helsinki. (In Finnish.)
33. Leviäkangas, P. 1998. Determination of the market value of a privately financed infrastructure project - Case of Järvenpää- Lahti motorway. In: International Symposium on Road Financing, Paris 4-6 November 1998. IRF, PIARC, World Bank and Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussees. Pp. 323-332.
34. Levy, S. 1996. Build-Operate-Transfer - Paving the way for tomorrow's infrastructure. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
35. Ling, F. Y. Y. 2005. Models for predicting quality of building projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural management, 12(1), 6-20. (Pubitemid 40242599)
36. MacDonald, M. 2002. Review of large public procurement in the UK. HM Treasury, London.
37. Mahdi, I. and Alreshaid, K. 2005. Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). International Journal of Project Management, 23, 564-572. (Pubitemid 41600529)
38. Manley, J., Plantagie, J. W., Wilkins, M., Calder, P. B. and Flynn, B. 2006. Evolution not revolution: rating the PPP sector 10 years on. In: Infrastructure Finance Ratings: Public Private Partnerships. Global Credit Survey 2006. Standard & Poor's, London. Pp. 14-18.
39. Merna, T. and Njiru, C. 2002. Financing Infrastructure Projects. Thomas Telford, London.
40. Miller, J. 2000. Principles of public and private infrastructure delivery. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
41. Molenaar, K., Songer, A. and Barash, M. 1999. Public Sector Design/Build Evolution and Performance. Journal of Management in Engineering, 15(2), 54-62. (Pubitemid 129494085)
42. Molin, P., Mannonen, M., Miettinen, T. and Vulli, T. 2004. Report on risk management in different procurement methods, Finnra Reports 39/2004. Finnish Road Administration, Helsinki. (In Finnish.)
43. Murto, R., Meriläinen, A., Tervonen, J. and Kiuru. J. 2002. Motorway VT4 Helsinki-Lahti. Post-evaluation of societal impacts. Finnra Reports 51/2002. Finnish Road Administration, Helsinki. (In Finnish.)
44. NAO. 1998. The Private Finance Initiative: The First Four Design, Build, Finance and Operate Roads Contracts. National Audit Office (NAO), London.
45. NAO. 2001. Managing the relationship to secure a successful partnership in PFI projects. National Audit Office (NAO), London.
46. NAO. 2006. Update on PFI debt refinancing and the PFI equity market. National Audit Office (NAO), London.
47. National Treasury. 2001. Project Finance, Introductory Manual on Project Finance for Managers of PPP Projects. National Treasury, Pretoria.
48. Oyentunji, A. and Anderson, S. 2006. Relative Effectiveness of Project Delivery and Contract Strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(1), 3-13.
49. Partnerships UK. 2006. Projects database. 〈http://www. partnershipsuk.org.uk〉 (Dec. 13, 2006).
50. Peltonen, T. and Kiiras, J. 1998. A client's risks in procurement methods. Helsinki, Rakennustieto. (In Finnish.)
51. PriceWaterhouseCoopers. 2005. Risk premium in the Finnish stock market. November 2005. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Helsinki. (In Finnish.)
52. Quiggin, J. 2004. Apples with apples: comparing the cost of capital. Public Infrastructure Bulletin, March 2004, pp. 11-12 + 21-22.
53. Reuters. 2006. Reuters Bond Details [electronic service]. Reuters, London. (Dec. 13, 2006.)
54. Rintala, K. 2004. The economic efficiency of accommodation service PFI projects. VTT Publications 555. VTT, Espoo. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/ publications/2004/P555.pdf.
55. Russell, A. and Nelms, C. 2006. The public sector comparator: uses and abuses. In: Construction in the XXI century: Local and global challenges. The Joint 2006 CIB W065/W055/W086 Symposium, Rome, Italy, October 18-20, 2006.
56. Salmela, V., Saltevo, A., Tolvanen, R., Kuorikoski, P. and Numminen, P. 2003. VT4 Helsinki-Lahti motorway, Intermediate evaluation. Finnra Internal publications 9/2003. Finnish Road Administration, Helsinki. (In Finnish.)
57. Sanvido, V. and Konchar, M. 1998. Project Delivery Systems: CM at Risk, Design-Build, Design-Bid-Build. Research Reports RR133-11. Construction Industry Institute (CII), Austin, TX.
58. Shaoul, J. 2005. A critical financial analysis of the Private Finance Initiative: selecting a financial method or allocating economic wealth? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(4), 441-471. (Pubitemid 40393384)
59. Singh, G., Archer, A. and Manley, J. 2006. European PFI/PPP secondary market starts to witness steady growth. In: Infrastructure Finance Ratings: Public Private Partnerships. Global Credit Survey 2006. Standard & Poor's, London. Pp. 37-40.
60. Snell, M. 2002. Cost-benefit analysis for engineers and planners. Thomas Telford, London.
61. Statistic Finland. 2006. Cost Index of Civil Engineering Works, Nov. 2006. Statistic Finland, Helsinki.
62. nd ed. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York.
63. Tervala, J., Raitanen, N. and Pelttari, R. 1996. Introduction of private finance for roads in Finland. Application of the shadow toll option on Main Road 4. Publications L23/96. Ministry of Transport and Communications Finland, Helsinki.
64. Thomas, S. R., Maclen, C. L., Chung, T. H. and Inho, K. 2002. Measuring the impacts of the delivery system on project performance - Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build. NIST GCR 02-840. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
65. Value Added Tax Law 1501/1993. 2006. Edita, Helsinki. (In Finnish.)
66. Welch, I. 2001. The Equity Premium Consensus Revisited. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1325. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University, Yale University, New Haven.
67. Yo, W.-D. and Lo, S.-S. 2005. Time-dependent construction social costs model. Construction Management and Economics, 23(3), 327-337. (Pubitemid 40479062)
68. Zhang, X. 2006. Public clients' best value perspectives of Public Private Partnerships in infrastructure development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(2), 107-114. (Pubitemid 43107208)