The current and future performance of road project delivery methods

VTT Publications

Volumn , Issue 549, 2004, Pages 3-115

  Koppinen, Tiina ^a   Lahdenperä, Pertti ^a  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Build Own Operate Transfer; Comparison; Construction management; Costs; Design Build; Design Build Finance Operate; Design Build Maintain; Future; Life cycle; Performance; Project delivery; Road procurement; Value generation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884710367     PISSN: 12350621     EISSN: 14550849     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Koppinen, T & Lahdenperä, P. Road Sector Experiences on Project Delivery Methods. VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes 2260. Espoo, Finland, 2004. 214 p. + app. 32 p. Available also at: http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/ 2004/T2260.pdf.
2. Doile, N.& Beattie, K. Transport Infrastructure Public Private Partnership in Queensland Context. Conference of the Australian Road Research Board, May 18-23 2003, Cairns, Australia. Proceedings. 7 p.
3. Weed, R.M. A rational method for relating as-built quality to pavement performance and value. Transportation Research Record 1632, Paper No. 98-0372. Pp. 32-39.
4. Contract Administration: technology and practise in Europe. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. International Technology Exchange Program. October 2002. 104 p.
5. Pakkala, P. Innovative Project Delivery Methods for Infrastructure - An International Perspective. Finnish Road Enterprise, Helsinki, Finland, 2002. 120 p.
6. Gibb, A.G.F. & Isack, F. Client drivers for construction projects: implications for standardisation. Engineering construction and architectural management, Vol. 1, No. 8, 2001. Pp. 46-58.
7. Global trends 2015: A dialogue about the future with nongovernment experts. National Intelligence Council. Report NIC 2000-02, December 2000, USA. 88 p.
8. Molenaar, K.R., Songer, A.D. & Barash, M. Public-sector design-build evolution and performance. Journal of management in engineering, March/April 1999. Pp. 54-62.
9. Lahdenperä, P & Rintala, K. Ajatuksia elinkaarivastuuhankkeista - kehittämiseksi [Thoughts on DBFO. A study of UK accommodation service procurement for the benefit of Finnish practice]. VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes 2192, Espoo, Finland, 2003. 52 p. + app. 2 p.
10. Marca, D. & McGowan, C. Structured analysis and design technique. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. New York, US, 1988. 392 p.
11. Ng, S.T. & Skitmore, R.M. Contractors' risks in Design, Novate and Construct contracts. International journal of project management, Vol. 20, 2002. Pp. 119-126. (Pubitemid 34039512)
12. Manley, K. & Hampson, K. Relationship Contracting on construction projects - A study commissioned by Queensland Department of main Roads. QUT/CSIRO construction Research Alliance, School of Construction Management and property, Queensland University of Technology. October 2000. 72 p.
13. Achieving outstanding performance, Queensland Department of Main roads, Value Management Workshop, Relationship based contracting - Output document, 24-25 August 2000. SRD Consulting. 35 p.
14. Sidwell, A.C. & Budiwan, D. The significance of the tendering contract on the opportunities for clients to encourage contractor-led innovation. Construction innovation, Vol. 1, 2001. Pp. 107-116.
15. National Audit Office, Report by the comptroller and auditor general. The private finance initiative: The first four design, build, finance and operate roads contracts. National, Audit Office, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions HC 476 Session 1997-98. Published 28 January, 1998. 78 p.
16. Langford, D.A., Kennedy, P. Conlin, J. & McKenzie, N. Comparison of construction costs on motorway projects using measure and value and alternative tendering initiative contractual arrangements. Construction management and economics, Vol. 21, December 2003. Pp. 831-840. (Pubitemid 38127204)
17. Junnonen, J-M & Lindholm, M. Julkisen ja yksityisen sektorin yhteistyö - Yksityisrahoitusmalli julkisissa rakennusinvestoinneissa. Rakennusteollisuuden Keskusliitto, Kehitys & tuottavuus, Nro 56, 1998. 95 p.
18. Scott, S. Guidebook to highway contracting for innovation: the role of procurement and contracting approaches in facilitating the implementation of research findings. Transportation Research Board. National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Report 428. National Academy Press, Washington D.C. 1999. 45 p.
19. Levy, S.M. Build-Operate-Transfer - Paving the way for tomorrow's infrastructure. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, USA, 1996. 411 p.
20. Marshall, C. The Öresund Tunnel - Making a success of design and build. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 14, No. 3. 1999. Pp. 355-365. (Pubitemid 30102507)
21. Jokela, P. Elinkaarimalli - Tiehallinnon hankintastrategia, osaraportti [Life cycle model]. Tiehallinnon selvityksiä 54/2002. Tiehallinto, Helsinki 2002. 48 p + app. 20 p.
22. Dorsey, R.W. Project Delivery Systems for Building Construction. Associated General Contractors of America. America, 1997. 283 p.
23. Transit Cooperative Research Program. International Transit Studies Program, report on the spring 2001 Mission - Design-Build Transit Infrastructure Projects in Asia and Australia. Research Results Digest, November 2002, No. 53. 31 p.
24. HM Treasury. PFI: meeting the investment challenge. July 2003. 128 p.
25. Rintala, K.M. The economic efficiency of accommodation service PFI projects. Draft 20/12/2003. Doctor's Thesis. Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College London, University of London. 235 p.
26. National Audit Office. PFI: Construction performance. National Audit Office, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 371 Session 2002-2003: 5 February 2003. 21 p.
27. National Audit Office. Managing the relationship to secure a successful partnership in PFI projects. National Audit Office, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 375 Session 2001-2002: 29 November 2001. 49 p.
28. Mott MacDonald. Review of Large Public Procurement in the UK. Mott MacDonald Study for HM Treasury. July 2002. 84 p.
29. Ardani, A. & Jesaitis, P. Evaluation of Design Build Practice in Colorado IR(CX)70-4(143). Colorado Department of Transportation, Research branch. Report No. CDOT-DTD-R-99-5, Final Report. July 1999, Colorado, USA. 42 p.
30. Porter, M.E. Competitive Advantage - Creating and sustaining superioir performance. The Free Press, New York, US, 1985. 558 p.
31. [Web-document] http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/dbfo/value-in-roads/01. htm . DBFO - Value in Roads. Highways Agency.
32. Transit New Zealand. Long-term Procurement Strategy. December 2000. 49 p.
33. Gransberg, D.D., Dillon, W.D., Reynolds, L. & Boyd, J. Quantitative Analysis of partnered project performance. Journal of construction engineering and management, vol 125, nr 3, May/June 1999. Pp. 161-166.
34. Miller, J.B., Garvin, M..J., Ibbs, C.W. & Mahoney, S.E. Toward a new paradigm: simultaneous use of multiple project delivery methods. Journal of management in Engineering, May/ June 2000. Pp. 58-67.
35. Skinner, D.G. Project delivery system selection. Transport Technology forum, 4 August, 1999. Australia.7 p.
36. Kumaraswamy, M.M. & Dissanayaka, S.M. Developing a decision support system for building project procurement. Building and Environment, Volume 36, Issue 3, 1 April 2001. Pp. 337-349.
37. [Web-document] http://www.ic.usu.edu/IC-Overview/Design%20Build/ DesignBuild%20OVERVIEW.htm. Design Build. Utah Technology Transfer Center.
38. Alhazmi, T. & McCaffer, R. Project procurement system selection model. Journal of construction engineering and management, Vol 126, No. 3, May/June 2000. Pp. 176-184.
39. Innovation 2010 - Building for growth. Industry Science Resources, Competitive Australia. The Commonwealth Department of Industry, Science and Resources. 24 p.
40. Peña-Mora, F. & Tamaki, T. Effect of delivery systems on collaborative negotiations for large-scale infrastructure projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, April 2001. Pp. 105-121. (Pubitemid 32287796)
41. Love, E.D. Influence of project type and procurement method on rework costs in building construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. January/February 2002. Pp.18-29.
42. Standing, N.A. Value management Incentive Programme - innovations in delivering value. Thomas Telford Publishing. London, UK, 2001. 126 p.
43. Chang, C.-Y. & Ive, G. Rethinking the multi-attribute utility approach based procurement route selection tehnique. Construction management and economics, Vol 20. 2002. Pp. 275-284. (Pubitemid 34468249)
44. VicRoads. Project management guidelines - Project delivery. VicRoads publication number 01303. 11 p.
45. Cheung, S.-O., Lam, T.-I., Leung, M.-Y. & Wan, Y.-W. An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method. Construction management and economics. Vol. 19, 2001. Pp. 427-437. (Pubitemid 32550634)
46. New tools for contracting - Partners in progress. The earthmover and civil contractor, July 1993. Pp. 37-39.
47. Queensland Government, State Development. Public Private Partenrships guidance material - Value for money framework. August 2002. 31 p.
48. Queensland Government, State Development. Public Private Partenrships guidance material - Policy. August 2002. 7 p.
49. Queensland Government, State Development. Public Private Partenrships guidance material - Supporting Documents - Business case development. August 2002. 49 p.
50. Hall, M., Holt, R. & Graves, A. Private finance, public roads: configuring the supply chain in PFI highway construction. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol. 6, No. 3-4, December 2000. Pp. 227-235.
51. Main Roads Project Delivery System, Volume 1 - Selection of Delivery Options, Version 2.0. Queensland Government, Department of Main Roads. October 2003.
52. W 92 CIB Procurement. Procurement - the way forward. Keynote papers presented to the International Symposium of Commission W92 of the International Council for Building Research, Studies and Documentation. CIB Proceedings, Montreal May 1997. CIB Publication 217. 94 p.
53. Howard, W.E., Bell, L.C. & McCormick, R.E. Economic principles of contractor compensation. Journal of management in engineering, September/October 1997. Pp. 81-89. (Pubitemid 127627399)