Realized economic efficiency of road project delivery systems

Journal of Infrastructure Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 321-329

  Koppinen, Tiina ^a   Lahdenperä, Pertti ^a  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Delivery; Economic factors; Life cycles; Project management

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT; ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC FACTORS; ROAD PROCUREMENT; ROAD PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS;

ROAD CONSTRUCTION;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; ROAD CONSTRUCTION;

CONSTRUCTION; DESIGN; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; LITERATURE REVIEW; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; ROAD CONSTRUCTION;

EID: 36448937440     PISSN: 10760342     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:4(321)     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AECOM Consulting and Science Applications International Corporation (AECOM). (2003). "Design-build effectiveness study-As required by TEA-21 Section 1307(f)." US DOT Advisory Team slides, AECOM, Birmingham, Ala.
2. Alhazmi, T., and McCaffer, R. (2000). "Project procurement system selection model." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. JCEMD40733-936410.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(176), 126(3), 176-184.
3. Ardani, A., and Jesaitis, P. (1999). "Evaluation of design-build practice in Colorado IR(CX)70-4(143)." Rep. No. CDOT-DTD-R-99-5, Colorado Dept. of Transportation, Denver.
4. Arditi, D., and Lee, D.-E. (2003). "Assessing corporate service quality performance of design-build contracts using quality function deployment." Constr. Manage. Econom. CMECF30144-619310.1080/ 0144619032000079716, 21, 175-185.
5. Arthur Andersen and Enterprise LSE. (2000). Value for money drivers in the private finance initiative, Treasury Taskforce, London.
6. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2002). "Contract administration: Technology and practice in Europe." FHwA-PL-03-002, FHwA, Washington, D.C.Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2002). "Contract administration: Technology and practice in Europe." FHwA-PL-03-002, FHwA, Washington, D.C.
7. Gransberg, D. D., Dillon, W. D., Reynolds, L., and Boyd, J. (1999). "Quantitative analysis of partnered project performance." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. JCEMD40733-936410.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:3(161), 125(3), 161-166.
8. Konchar, M. D. (1997). "A comparison of United States project delivery systems." Ph.D., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
9. Koppinen, T., and Lahdenperä, P. (2004a). "Road sector experiences on project delivery methods." VTT Research Notes 2260, Espoo, Finland.Koppinen, T., and Lahdenperä, P. (2004a). "Road sector experiences on project delivery methods." VTT Research Notes 2260, Espoo, Finland.
10. Koppinen, T., and Lahdenperä, P. (2004b). "The current and future performance of road project delivery methods." VTT Publications 549, Espoo, Finland.Koppinen, T., and Lahdenperä, P. (2004b). "The current and future performance of road project delivery methods." VTT Publications 549, Espoo, Finland.
11. Kumaraswamy, M. M., and Dissanayaka, S. M. (1996). "Procurement by objectives." J. Constr. Procure. ZZZZZZ1358-9180, 2(2), 38-51.
12. Kumaraswamy, M. M., and Dissanayaka, S. M. (2001). "Developing a decision support system for building project procurement." Build. Environ. BUSCBC0360-132310.1016/S0360-1323(00)00011-1, 36(3), 337-349.
13. Lahdenperä, P., and Koppinen, T. (2003). "Incentive payment bases for a construction project-Part 1. International state-of-art review." VTT Research Notes 2191, Espoo, Finland (in Finnish).Lahdenperä, P., and Koppinen, T. (2003). "Incentive payment bases for a construction project-Part 1. International state-of-art review." VTT Research Notes 2191, Espoo, Finland (in Finnish).
14. Love, E. D. (2002). "Influence of project type and procurement method on rework costs in building construction projects." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. JCEMD40733-936410.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(18), 128(1), 18-29.
15. Molenaar, K. R., and Songer, A. D. (1998). "Model for public sector design-build project selection." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. JCEMD40733-936410.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(467), 124(6), 467-479.
16. Molenaar, K. R., Songer, A. D., and Barash, M. (1999). "Public-sector design-build evolution and performance." J. Manage. Eng. JMENEA0742-597X10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1999)15:2(54), 15(2), 54-62.
17. National Audit Office (NAO). (2001). "Managing the relationship to secure a successful partnership in PFI projects." National Audit Office, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 375, National Audit Office, London.
18. National Audit Office (NAO). (2003). "PFI: Construction performance." National Audit Office, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 371, National Audit Office, London.
19. Ng, S. T., Luu, D. T., Chen, S. E., and Lam, K. C. (2002). "Fuzzy membership functions of procurement selection criteria." Constr. Manage. Econom. CMECF30144-619310.1080/01446190210121288, 20, 285-296.
20. Palaneeswaran, E. (2000). "Contractor selection systems for design-build projects." Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
21. Pakkala, P. (2002). Innovative project delivery methods for infrastructure. An international perspective, Finnish Road Enterprise, Helsinki, Finland.
22. Zhang, X. (2006). "Public clients' best value perspectives of public private partnerships in infrastructure development." J. Constr. Eng. Manage. JCEMD40733-936410.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:2(107), 132(2), 107-114.