Selective Attention in Normal and Impaired Hearing

Trends in Amplification

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 283-299

  Shinn Cunningham, Barbara G ^a,b   Best, Virginia ^a,c  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

attention; auditory object; auditory scene analysis; segregation

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONVERSATION; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; NOISE REDUCTION; REVIEW; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COMMUNICATION; CUES; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MEMORY; PERCEPTUAL MASKING;

EID: 56249105137     PISSN: 10847138     EISSN: 19405588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1084713808325306     Document Type: Article

References (136)

1. Alain C. Tremblay K. (2007). The role of event-related brain potentials in assessing central auditory processing. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 573–589.
2. Arbogast T. L. Mason C. R. Kidd G. Jr. (2005). The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 2169–2180.
3. Baer T. Moore B. C. Gatehouse S. (1993). Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: Effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 30, 49–72.
4. Bashford J. A. Jr. Meyers M. D. Brubaker B. S. Warren R. M. (1988). Illusory continuity of interrupted speech: Speech rate determines durational limits. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 1635–1638.
5. Bashford J. A. Jr. Warren R. M. (1987). Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 114–121.
6. Bernstein J. G. Oxenham A. J. (2006). The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: Sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 3929–3945.
7. Best V. Gallun F. J. Carlile S. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2007). Binaural interference and auditory grouping. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 420–432.
8. Best V. Gallun F. J. Ihlefeld A. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2006). The influence of spatial separation on divided listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 1506–1516.
9. Best V. Ihlefeld A. Mason C. R. Kidd G. Jr. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2007). Divided listening in auditory displays. Paper presented at the International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid, Spain.
10. Best V. Marrone N. Mason C. R. Kidd G. Jr. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2007). Do hearing-impaired listeners benefit from spatial and temporal cues in a complex auditory scene? Paper presented at the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, Helsingor, Denmark.
11. Best V. Ozmeral E. J. Kopco N. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2008). Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 13174–13178.
12. Best V. Ozmeral E. J. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2007). Visually guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8, 294–304.
13. Braida L. D. Lim J. S. Berliner J. E. Durlach N. I. Rabinowitz W. M. Purks S. R. (1984). Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 722–731.
14. Bregman A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge: MIT Press.
15. Broadbent D. E. (1952). Failures of attention in selective listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 428–433.
16. Broadbent D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
17. Bronkhorst A. W. Plomp R. (1992). Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 3132–3139.
18. Brown J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 12–21.
19. Brungart D. S. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1101–1109.
20. Brungart D. S. Simpson B. D. Darwin C. J. Arbogast T. L. Kidd G. Jr. (2005). Across-ear interference from parametrically degraded synthetic speech signals in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 292–304.
21. Brungart D. S. Simpson B. D. Ericson M. A. Scott K. R. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2527–2538.
22. Bunnell H. T. (1990). On enhancement of spectral contrast in speech for hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 2546–2556.
23. Buschman T. J. Miller E. K. (2007). Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science (New York), 315, 1860–1862.
24. Buss E. Hall J. W. III Grose J. H. (2004). Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 25, 242–250.
25. Byrne D. Dillon H. Ching T. Katsch R. Keidser G. (2001). NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12, 37–51.
26. Carhart R. Tillman T. W. Greetis E. S. (1969). Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 694–703.
27. Carlyon R. P. (2004). How the brain separates sounds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 465–471.
28. Carlyon R. P. Long C. J. Deeks J. M. McKay C. M. (2007). Concurrent sound segregation in electric and acoustic hearing. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8, 119–133.
29. Conway A. R. Cowan N. Bunting M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331–335.
30. Cooke M. (2006). A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1562–1573.
31. Craik F. I. (2007). The role of cognition in age-related hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 539–547.
32. Culling J. F. Darwin C. J. (1993). The role of timbre in the segregation of simultaneous voices with intersecting F0 contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 303–309.
33. Culling J. F. Summerfield Q. (1995). Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: Absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delay. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 785–797.
34. Cusack R. Carlyon R. P. Robertson I. H. (2001). Auditory midline and spatial discrimination in patients with unilateral neglect. Cortex, 37, 706–709.
35. Cusack R. Deeks J. Aikman G. Carlyon R. P. (2004). Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 30, 643–656.
36. Darwin C. J. (1997). Auditory grouping. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 327–333.
37. Darwin C. J. (2006). Contributions of binaural information to the separation of different sound sources. International Journal of Audiology, 45(Suppl. 1), S20–S24.
38. Darwin C. J. Carlyon R. P. (1995). Auditory grouping. In Moore B. C. J. (Ed.), Hearing (pp. 387–424). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
39. Darwin C. J. Ciocca V. (1992). Grouping in pitch perception: Effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 3381–3390.
40. Darwin C. J. Hukin R. W. (1998). Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference in conjunction with mistuning and onset asynchrony. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 1080–1084.
41. Darwin C. J. Hukin R. W. (2000a). Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 970–977.
42. Darwin C. J. Hukin R. W. (2000b). Effects of reverberation on spatial, prosodic, and vocal-tract size cues to selective attention. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 335–342.
43. Deeks J. M. Carlyon R. P. (2004). Simulations of cochlear implant hearing using filtered harmonic complexes: Implications for concurrent sound segregation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 1736–1746.
44. Desimone R. Duncan J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
45. Dillon H. (2001). Hearing aids. New York: Thieme Medical.
46. Dillon H. Lovegrove R. (1993). Single microphone noise reduction systems for hearing aids: A review and an evaluation. In Studebaker G. A. Hochberg I. (Eds.), Acoustical factors affecting hearing aid performance (pp. 353–372). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
47. Divenyi P. (2005). Humans glimpse, too, not only machines (hommage a Martin Cooke). Paper presented at Forum Acusticum 2005, Budapest, Hungary.
48. Drennan W. R. Gatehouse S. Lever C. (2003). Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: The role of spatial location. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 2178–2189.
49. Duquesnoy A. J. (1983). Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 739–743.
50. Edwards B. (2007). The future of hearing aid technology. Trends in Amplification, 11, 31–46.
51. Elhilali M. Fritz J. B. Chi T. S. Shamma S. A. (2007). Auditory cortical receptive fields: Stable entities with plastic abilities. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 10372–10382.
52. Festen J. M. Plomp R. (1990). Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1725–1736.
53. Fritz J. B. Elhilali M. David S. V. Shamma S. A. (2007). Auditory attention—Focusing the searchlight on sound. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17, 437–455.
54. Gatehouse S. Akeroyd M. (2006). Two-eared listening in dynamic situations. International Journal of Audiology, 45(Suppl. 1), S120–S124.
55. Gatehouse S. Akeroyd M. A. (2008). The effects of cueing temporal and spatial attention on word recognition in a complex listening task in hearing-impaired listeners. Trends in Amplification, 12, 145–161.
56. Gatehouse S. Naylor G. Elberling C. (2003). Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. International Journal of Audiology, 42(Suppl. 1), S77–S85.
57. Gatehouse S. Noble W. (2004). The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology, 43, 85–99.
58. Gaudrain E. Grimault N. Healy E. W. Bera J. C. (2007). Effect of spectral smearing on the perceptual segregation of vowel sequences. Hearing Research, 231, 32–41.
59. Gordon-Salant S. Fitzgibbons P. J. Friedman S. A. (2007). Recognition of time-compressed and natural speech with selective temporal enhancements by young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1181–1193.
60. Gordon-Salant S. Yeni-Komshian G. H. Fitzgibbons P. J. Barrett J. (2006). Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2455–2466.
61. Grose J. H. Hall J. W., III (1996). Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in listeners with cochlear hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1149–1158.
62. Grose J. H. Hall J. W. III Buss E. (2006). Temporal processing deficits in the pre-senescent auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2305–2315.
63. Hall J. W. III Davis A. C. Haggard M. P. Pillsbury H. C. (1988). Spectro-temporal analysis in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 1325–1331.
64. Hall J. W. III Grose J. H. (1994). Signal detection in complex comodulated backgrounds by normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 435–443.
65. Healy E. W. Bacon S. P. (2002). Across-frequency comparison of temporal speech information by listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1262–1275.
66. Healy E. W. Kannabiran A. Bacon S. P. (2005). An across-frequency processing deficit in listeners with hearing impairment is supported by acoustic correlation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1236–1242.
67. Hopkins K. Moore B. C. Stone M. A. (2008). Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 1140–1153.
68. Humes L. E. (2007). The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 590–603.
69. Ihlefeld A. Shinn-Cunningham B. (2008a). Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a divided speech identification task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 4380–4392.
70. Ihlefeld A. Shinn-Cunningham B. (2008b). Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a selective speech identification task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 4369–4379.
71. Ihlefeld A. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (in press). Disentangling the effects of spatial cues on selection and formation of auditory objects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
72. Kastner S. Ungerleider L. G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 315–341.
73. Kidd G. Jr. Arbogast T. L. Mason C. R. Gallun F. J. (2005). The advantage of knowing where to listen. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3804–3815.
74. Kidd G. Jr. Arbogast T. L. Mason C. R. Walsh M. (2002). Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 3, 107–119.
75. Kidd G. Jr. Best V. Mason C. R. (in press). Listening to every other word: Examining the strength of linkage variables in forming streams of speech. Manuscript submitted for publication.
76. Kidd G. Jr. Mason C. R. Hanna T. E. (1988). Evidence for sensory-trace comparisons in spectral shape discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 144–149.
77. Knudsen E. I. (2007). Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review in Neuroscience, 30, 57–78.
78. Lee A. K. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2008). Effects of frequency disparities on trading of an ambiguous tone between two competing auditory objects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 4340–4351.
79. Leek M. R. Summers V. (2001). Pitch strength and pitch dominance of iterated rippled noises in hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2944–2954.
80. Levitt H. (2001). Noise reduction in hearing aids: A review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 38, 111–121.
81. Li L. Daneman M. Qi J. Schneider B. (2004). Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect speech recognition in younger and older adults? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1077–1091.
82. Lorenzi C. (2008). Reception of phonetic features in fluctuating background noise maskers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 3931.
83. Lorenzi C. Gilbert G. Carn H. Garnier S. Moore B. C. (2006). Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 18866–18869.
84. Macken W. J. Tremblay S. Houghton R. J. Nicholls A. P. Jones D. M. (2003). Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29, 43–51.
85. Mackersie C. L. Boothroyd A. Prida T. (2000). Use of a simultaneous sentence perception test to enhance sensitivity to ease of listening. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 675–682.
86. Mackersie C. L. Prida T. L. Stiles D. (2001). The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 19–28.
87. Maddox R. Alvarez R. Streeter T. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2008). Top-down attention modulates bottom-up streaming based on pitch and location. Paper presented at the mid-winter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Phoenix, AZ.
88. Marrone N. Mason C. R. Kidd G. Jr. (2007). Listening in a multisource environment with and without hearing aids. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research, Helsingor, Denmark.
89. McCoy S. L. Tun P. A. Cox L. C. Colangelo M. Stewart R. A. Wingfield A. (2005). Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 22–33.
90. Miller G. A. Licklider J. C. R. (1950). The intelligibility of interrupted speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 167–173.
91. Moore B. C. (2007). Cochlear hearing loss: Physiological, psychological, and technical issues (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
92. Moore B. C. Glasberg B. R. Hopkins K. (2006). Frequency discrimination of complex tones by hearing-impaired subjects: Evidence for loss of ability to use temporal fine structure. Hearing Research, 222, 16–27.
93. Moore B. C. Shailer M. J. Hall J. W. III Schooneveldt G. P. (1993). Comodulation masking release in subjects with unilateral and bilateral hearing impairment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 435–451.
94. Moray N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 55–60.
95. Murphy D. R. Daneman M. Schneider B. A. (2006). Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations? Psychology and Aging, 21, 49–61.
96. Naatanen R. Tervaniemi M. Sussman E. Paavilainen P. Winkler I. (2001). “Primitive intelligence” in the auditory cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 283–288.
97. Noble W. (2006). Bilateral hearing aids: A review of self-reports of benefit in comparison with unilateral fitting. International Journal of Audiology, 45(Suppl. 1), S63–S71.
98. Pashler H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge: MIT Press.
99. Petkov C. I. O'Connor K. N. Sutter M. L. (2003). Illusory sound perception in macaque monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9155–9161.
100. Pichora-Fuller M. K. (2003). Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. International Journal of Audiology, 42, S26–S32.
101. Pichora-Fuller M. K. (2007). Audition and cognition: What audiologists need to know about listening. In Palmer C. Seewald R. (Eds.), Hearing care for adults: An international conference (pp. 71–85). Warrenville, IL: Phonak.
102. Pichora-Fuller M. K. Schneider B. Daneman M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 593–608.
103. Pichora-Fuller M. K. Schneider B. Hamstra S. Benson N. Storzer E. (2006). Effect of age on gap detection in speech and non-speech stimuli varying in marker duration and spectral symmetry. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1143–1155.
104. Pichora-Fuller M. K. Schneider B. MacDonald E. Brown S. Pass H. (2007). Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging. Hearing Research, 223, 114–121.
105. Pichora-Fuller M. K. Souza P. (2003). Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. International Journal of Audiology, 42, S11–S16.
106. Pitt M. A. Samuel A. G. (1990). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 16, 564–573.
107. Rabbitt P. M. A. (1966). Recognition: Memory for words correctly heard in noise. Psychonomic Science, 6, 383–384.
108. Rakerd B. Seitz P. F. Whearty M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive demands of speech listening for people with hearing losses. Ear and Hearing, 17, 97–106.
109. Rankovic C. M. (1991). An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 391–402.
110. Richards V. M. Neff D. L. (2004). Cuing effects for informational masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 289–300.
111. Ricketts T. A. Dittberner A. B. (2002). Directional amplification for improved signal-to-noise ratio: Strategies, measurements, and limitations. In Valente M. (Ed.), Hearing aids: Standards, options, and limitations (pp. 274–346). New York: Thieme.
112. Rosen S. (1992). Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 336, 367–373.
113. Samuel A. G. (2001). Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychological Science, 12, 348–351.
114. Schneider B. A. Daneman M. Murphy D. R. (2005). Speech comprehension difficulties in older adults: Cognitive slowing or age-related changes in hearing? Psychology and Aging, 20, 261–271.
115. Schneider B. A. Daneman M. Pichora-Fuller M. K. (2002). Listening in aging adults: From discourse comprehension to psychoacoustics. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 139–152.
116. Schneider B. A. Li L. Daneman M. (2007). How competing speech interferes with speech comprehension in everyday listening situations. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 559–572.
117. Serences J. T. Liu T. Yantis S. (2005). Parietal mechanisms of switching and maintaining attention to locations, objects, and features. In Itti L. Rees G. Tsotsos J. (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 35–41). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
118. Serences J. T. Shomstein S. Leber A. B. Golay X. Egeth H. E. Yantis S. (2005). Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychological Science, 16, 114–122.
119. Shamma S. (2008). On the emergence and awareness of auditory objects. PLoS Biology, 6, 1141–1143.
120. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. (2008). Object-based auditory and visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 182–186.
121. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. Lee A. K. Oxenham A. J. (2007). A sound element gets lost in perceptual competition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 12223–12227.
122. Shinn-Cunningham B. G. Wang D. (2008). Influences of auditory object formation on phonemic restoration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 295–301.
123. Singh G. Pichora-Fuller M. K. Schneider B. A. (2008). Auditory spatial attention in conditions of real and simulated spatial separation by younger and older adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124.
124. Teder-Sälejärvi W. A. Hillyard S. A. (1998). The gradient of spatial auditory attention in free field: An event-related potential study. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 1228–1242.
125. Treitz F. H. Heyder K. Daum I. (2007). Differential course of executive control changes during normal aging. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition, 14, 370–393.
126. Tun P. A. (1998). Fast noisy speech: Age differences in processing rapid speech with background noise. Psychology and Aging, 13, 424–434.
127. Tun P. A. O'Kane G. Wingfield A. (2002). Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. Psychology and Aging, 17, 453–467.
128. Turner C. W. Chi S. L. Flock S. (1999). Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 773–784.
129. van Noorden L. P. A. S. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Eindhoven, the Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology.
130. Warren R. M. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science (New York), 167, 392–393.
131. Warren R. M. Bashford J. A. Jr. Healy E. W. Brubaker B. S. (1994). Auditory induction: Reciprocal changes in alternating sounds. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 313–322.
132. Warren R. M. Hainsworth K. R. Brubaker B. S. Bashford J. A. Jr. Healy E. W. (1997). Spectral restoration of speech: Intelligibility is increased by inserting noise in spectral gaps. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 275–283.
133. Wingfield A. Tun P. (2007). Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 548–558.
134. Wolfe J. M. Horowitz T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews, 5, 495–501.
135. Wood N. Cowan N. (1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 255–260.
136. Woods W. S. Colburn H. S. (1992). Test of a model of auditory object formation using intensity and interaural time difference discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2894–2902.