Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations?

Psychology and Aging

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 49-61

  Murphy, Dana R ^a,b   Daneman, Meredyth ^a   Schneider, Bruce A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NIPISSING UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Comprehending conversations; Hearing; Listening to dialogue; Speech understanding in aging

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; COGNITION DISORDERS; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33747047788     PISSN: 08827974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.49     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Arbogast, T. L., Mason, C. R., & Kidd, G. (2002). The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2086-2098.
2. Baltes, P. B., & Lindenberger, U. (1997). Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychology and Aging, 12, 12-21.
3. Bert, N. A. (1993). Breakfast. In N. A. Bert & D. Bert (Eds.), Play it again! More one-act plays for acting students (pp. 63-70). Colorado Springs, CO: Meriwether Publishing.
4. Bilger, R. C., Nuetzel, M. J., Rabinowitz, W. M., & Rzeczkowski, C. (1984). Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 32-48.
5. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Brown, J. I. (1984). Efficient reading (6th ed.). Lexington, MA: Heath.
7. Cadman, L. (1994). Peace in our time. In Off-off broadway festival plays eighteenth series (pp. 19-30). New York: Samuel French.
8. CHABA Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics. (1988). Speech understanding and aging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 859-895.
9. Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975-979.
10. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Cohen, G. (1987). Speech comprehension in the elderly: The effects of cognitive changes. British Journal of Audiology, 21, 221-226.
12. Cooper, B. (1994). Out of body. In Instant applause (pp. 53-58). Winnipeg, Ontario, Canada: Blizzard Publishing.
13. DeDe, G., Caplan, D., Kemtes, K., & Waters, G. (2004). The relationship between age, verbal working memory, and language comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 19, 601-606.
14. Dubno, J. R., Ahlstrom, J. B., & Horwitz, A. R. (2002). Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1297-1310.
15. Duquesnoy, A. J. (1983). Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 739-743.
16. Fisher, D. L., & Glaser, R. A. (1996). Molar and latent models of cognitive slowing: Implications for aging, dementia, depression, development, and intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 458-480.
17. Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Gordon-Salant, S. (1996). Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 183-189.
18. Freyman, R. L., Balakrishnan, U., & Helfer, K. S. (2001). Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2112-2122.
19. Freyman, R. L., Helfer, K. S., McCall, D. D., & Clifton, R. K. (1999). The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3578-3588.
20. Gelfand, S. A., Ross, L., & Miller, S. (1988). Sentence reception in noise from one versus two sources: Effects of aging and hearing loss. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 248-256.
21. Hamilton-Wentworth District Health Council. (1988). Services for seniors study: Report of findings and recommendations. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth District Health Council.
22. Harnetiaux, B. P. (1993). The lemonade stand. In N. A. Bert & D. Bert (Eds.), Play it again! More one-act plays for acting students (pp. 55-61). Colorado Springs, CO: Meriwether Publishing.
23. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193-225). New York: Academic Press.
24. Hirsh, I. J. (1950). The relation between localization and intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 196-200.
25. Humes, L. E. (1996). Speech understanding in the elderly. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 161-167.
26. Humes, L. E., Watson, B. U., Christensen, L. A., Cokely, C. A., Halling, D. A., & Lee, L. (1994). Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 465-475.
27. Kempler, D., & Zelinski, E. M. (1994). Language in dementia and normal aging. In F. A. Huppert, C. Brayne, & D. W. O'Connor (Eds.), Dementia and normal aging (pp. 331-365). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Kwong-See, S., & Ryan, E. B. (1996). Cognitive mediation of discourse processing in later life. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 20, 109-117.
29. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467-477.
30. Li, L., Daneman, M., Qi, J., & Schneider, B. A. (2004). Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect speech recognition in younger and older adults? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1077-1091.
31. Light, L. (1990). Interactions between memory and language in old age. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed., pp. 275-290). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32. Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection. Psychology and Aging, 9, 339-355.
33. McCoy, S. L., Tun, P. A., Cox, I. C., Colangelo, M., Stewart, R. A., & Wingfield, A. (2005). Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults' memory for speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 22-33.
34. Murphy, D. R., McDowd, J. M., & Wilcox, K. A. (1999). Inhibition and aging: Similarities between younger and older adults as revealed by the processing of unattended auditory information. Psychology and Aging, 14, 44-59.
35. Noble, W., & Perrett, S. (2002). Hearing speech against spatially separate competing speech versus competing noise. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1325-1336.
36. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 593-608.
37. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 77, 169-225.
38. Pollack, I., & Pickett, J. M. (1964). Intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech: Auditory vs. structural content. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 79-84.
39. Raven, J. C. (1965). The Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale. London: H. K. Lewis.
40. Reynolds, W. (1993). Absolution. In N. A. Bert & D. Bert (Eds.), Play it again! More one-act plays for acting students (pp. 133-140). Colorado Springs, CO: Meriwether Publishing.
41. Rivera, J. (1993). Slaughter in the lake. In E. Lane (Ed.), Telling tales: New one-act plays (pp. 274-284). New York: Penguin Books.
42. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
43. Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Mediation of adult age differences in cognition by reductions in working memory and speed of processing. Psychological Science, 2, 179-183.
44. Salthouse, T. A. (1994). The nature of the influence of speed on adult age differences in cognition. Developmental Psychology, 30, 240-259.
45. Salthouse, T. A., Hancock, H. E., Meinz, E. J., & Hambrick, D. Z. (1996). Interrelations of age, visual acuity, and cognitive functioning. Journal of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 51B, P317-P330.
46. Schneider, B. A. (1997). Psychoacoustics and aging: Implications for everyday listening. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 21, 111-124.
47. Schneider, B. A., Daneman, M., Murphy, D. R., & Kwong-See, S. (2000). Listening to discourse in distracting settings: The effects of aging. Psychology and Aging, 15, 110-125.
48. Schneider, B. A., & Pichora-Fuller, M. A. (2000). Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 155-219). New York: Erlbaum.
49. Schneider, B. A., & Pichora-Fuller, M. A. (2001). Age-related changes in temporal processing: Implications for listening comprehension. Seminars in Hearing, 22, 227-239.
50. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
51. Stern, P. C., & Carstensen, L. L. (Eds.). (2000). The aging mind: Opportunities in cognitive research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
52. Stolcke, A., Reese, K., Coccaro, N., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Jurafsky, D., et al. (2000). Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26, 339-373.
53. Titone, D., Prentice, K. J., & Wingfield, A. (2000). Resource allocation during spoken discourse processing: Effects of age and passage difficulty as revealed by self-paced listening. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1029-1040.
54. Tun, P. A., O' Kane, G., & Wingfield, A. (2002). Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. Psychology and Aging, 17, 453-467.
55. Tun, P. A., & Wingfield, A. (1999). One voice too many: Adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds. Journal of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54B, P317-P327.
56. Uhlmann, R. F., Larson, E. B., Rees, T. S., Koepsell, T. D., & Duckert, L. G. (1989). Relationship of hearing impairment to dementia and cognitive dysfunction in older adults. Journal of the American Medical Association, 261, 1916-1919.
57. van Rooij, J. C. G. M., & Plomp, R. (1990). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners: II: Multivariate analyses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 2611-2624.
58. van Rooij, J. C. G. M., & Plomp, R. (1992). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners: III: Additional data and final discussion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 1028-1033.
59. Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
60. Wingfield, A. (1996). Cognitive factors in auditory performance: Context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 7, 175-182.
61. Wingfield, A., Poon, L. W., Lombardi, L., & Lowe, D. (1985). Speed of processing on normal aging: Effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 579-585.
62. Wingfield, A., & Stine, E. A. L. (1992). Age differences in perceptual processing and memory for spoken language. In J. D. Simon & R. L. West (Eds.), Everyday memory and aging: Current research and methodology (pp. 101-123). New York: Springer-Verlag.
63. Wingfield, A., Stine, E. A. L., Lahar, C. J., & Aberdeen, J. S. (1988). Does the capacity of working memory change with age? Experimental Aging Research, 14, 103-107.
64. Wingfield, A., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2000). Language and speech. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 359-416). New York: Erlbaum.
65. Wingfield, A., & Tun, P. (2001). Spoken language comprehension in older adults: Interactions between sensory and cognitive change in normal aging. Seminars in Hearing, 22, 287-301.
66. Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions, and silences in conversation. In R. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Differences and dominance (pp. 105-129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
67. Zurek, P. M. (1993). Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility. In G. A. Studebaker & G. A. Hockberg (Eds.), Acoustic factors affecting hearing aid performance (pp. 255-276). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.