Concurrent sound segregation in electric and acoustic hearing

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 119-133

  Carlyon, Robert P ^a   Long, Christopher J ^a   Deeks, John M ^a   McKay, Colette M ^b  

^a MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Grouping; Onset delays; Pitch

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRIC HEARING; ELECTRODE; HEARING; HUMAN; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NERVE FIBER; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TECHNIQUE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33846807690     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0068-1     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. BAUMANN U, NOBBE A. Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays. Hear. Res. 196:49-57, 2004.
2. BENCH J, BAMFORD J. Speech-Hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-Impaired Children. London, Academic, 1979.
3. BIERER JA, MIDDLEBROOKS JC. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 5:32-48, 2004.
4. BREGMAN AS. Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge, MA, M.I.T. Press, 1990.
5. BREGMAN AS, PINKER S. Auditory streaming and the building of timbre. Can. J. Psychol. 32:19-31, 1978.
6. CARLYON RP. Detecting mistuning in the presence of synchronous and asynchronous interfering sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:2622-2630, 1994.
7. CARLYON RP. Encoding the fundamental frequency of a complex tone in the presence of a spectrally overlapping masker. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:517-524, 1996a.
8. CARLYON RP. Masker asynchrony impairs the fundamental-frequency discrimination of unresolved harmonics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:525-533, 1996b.
9. CARLYON RP, GOCKEL H. Effects of harmonicity and regularity on the perception of sound sources. In: Yost WA (ed) Springer Handbook of Auditory Research: Auditory Perception of Sound Sources. Berlin, Springer-Verlag (in press).
10. CARLYON RP, VAN WIERINGEN A, LONG CJ, DEEKS JM, WOUTERS J. Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112:621-633, 2002.
11. CHATTERJEE M, GALVIN JJ, FU QJ, SHANNON RV. Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 7:15-25, 2006.
12. DANNENBRING GL, BREGMAN AS. Streaming vs. fusion of sinusoidal components of complex tones. Percept. Psychophys. 24:369-376, 1978.
13. DARWIN CJ. Perceptual grouping of speech components differing in fundamental frequency and onset time. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 33A:185-287, 1981.
14. DARWIN CJ. Listening to two things at once. In: Schouten B (ed) Audition, Speech, and Language. Berlin, Mouton-De Gruyter, pp. 133-148, 1992.
15. DARWIN CJ, CARLYON RP. Auditory grouping. In: Moore BCJ (ed) Hearing. Orlando, FL, Academic, pp. 387-424, 1995.
16. DARWIN CJ, CIOCCA V. Grouping in pitch perception: effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:3381-3390, 1992.
17. DARWIN CJ, GARDNER RB. Mistuning a harmonic of a vowel: grouping and phase effects on vowel quality. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:838-845, 1986.
18. DARWIN CJ, SUTHERLAND NS. Grouping frequency components of vowels: when is a harmonic not a harmonic? Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 36A:193-208, 1984.
19. DEEKS JM, CARLYON RP. Simulations of cochlear implant hearing using filtered harmonic complexes: implications for concurrent sound segregation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115:1736-1746, 2004.
20. FU Q J, NOGAKI G. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 6:19-27, 2005.
21. GOCKEL H, CARLYON RP, PLACK CJ. Across-frequency interference effects in fundamental frequency discrimination: questioning evidence for two pitch mechanisms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116:1092-1104, 2004.
22. GREEN DM. Profile Analysis. New York, Oxford University Press, 1988.
23. GREEN T, FAULKNER A, ROSEN S. Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116:2298-2310, 2004.
24. GRIMAULT N, MICHEYL C, CARLYON RP, ARTHAUD P, COLLET L. Influence of peripheral resolvability on the perceptual segregation of harmonic complex tones differing in fundamental frequency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:263-271, 2000.
25. HARTMANN WM, JOHNSON D. Stream segregation and peripheral channeling. Music Percept. 9:155-184, 1991.
26. HARTMANN WM, MCADAMS S, SMITH BK. Hearing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex tone. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88:1712-1724, 1990.
27. HOEKSTRA A. Frequency discrimination and frequency analysis in hearing. Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Audiology, University Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands, 1979.
28. HOUTSMA AJM, SMURZYNSKI J. J.F. Schouten revisited: pitch of complex tones having many high-order harmonics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87:304-310, 1990.
29. HUKIN RW, DARWIN CJ. Comparison of the effect of onset asynchrony on auditory grouping in pitch matching and vowel identification. Percept. Psychophys. 57:191-196, 1995.
30. KETTEN DR, VANNIER MW, SKINNER MW, GATES GA, WANG G, NEELY JG. In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 107:1-16, 1998.
31. KIM DO, MOLNAR CE, MATTHEWS JW. Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:1704-1721, 1980.
32. KWON BJ, VAN DEN HONERT C. Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners. 119:2994-3002, 2006.
33. LANEAU J, WOUTERS J, MOONEN M. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants. Audiology and Neurotology 11:38-52, 2006.
34. LEVITT H. Transformed up-down methods in psychophysics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49:467-477, 1971.
35. LOEB GE. Are cochlear implant patients suffering from perceptual dissonance? Ear Hear. 26:435-450, 2005.
36. MACMILLAN NA, CREELMAN CD. Detection Theory: A User's Guide. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
37. MCDERMOTT HJ, MCKAY CM, VANDALI AE. A new portable sound processor for the University-of- Melbourne nucleus limited multielectrode cochlear implant. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:3367-3371, 1992.
38. MCKAY CM, CARLYON RP. Dual temporal pitch percepts from acoustic and electric amplitude-modulated pulse trains. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:347-357, 1999.
39. MCKAY CM, HENSHALL KR, FARREL RJ, MCDERMOTT HJ. A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 113:2054-2063, 2003.
40. MCKAY CM, MCDERMOTT HJ. Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:1061-1074, 1998.
41. MCKAY CM, MCDERMOTT HJ, CARLYON RP. Place and temporal cues in pitch perception: are they truly independent? Acoust. Res. Lett. Online (http://scitation.aip.org/arlo/) 1:25-30, 2000.
42. MCKAY CM, RENNINE MD, MCDERMOTT HJ. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: Effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 110:1514-1526, 2001.
43. MOORE BCJ. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 2nd edn. London, Academic, 1982.
44. MOORE BCJ, CARLYON RP. Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users. In: Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ (eds) Springer Handbook of Auditory Research: Pitch Perception. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 234-277, 2005.
45. MOORE BCJ, GLASBERG BR, BAER T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness and partial loudness. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 45:224-240, 1997.
46. NELSON PB, JIN SH, CARNEY AE, NELSON DA. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normalhearing listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:961-968, 2003.
47. OXENHAM AJ, BERNSTEIN JGW, PENAGOS H. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:1421-1425, 2004.
48. ROBERTS B. Spectral pattern, grouping, and the pitches of complex tones and their components. Acta Acustica United Acustica 91:945-957, 2005.
49. SHACKLETON TM, CARLYON RP. The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:3529-3540, 1994.
50. SHAMMA S. Speech processing in the auditory system: II. Lateral inhibition and the central processing of speech evoked activity in the auditory nerve. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78:1622-1632, 1985.
51. SHANNON RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 11:157-189, 1983.
52. SKINNER MW, CLARK GM, WHITFORD LA, ET AL. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am. J. Otol. 15:15-27, 1994.
53. SNYDER RL, BIERER JA, MIDDLEBROOKS JC. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 5:305-322, 2004.
54. STICKNEY GS, ZENG FG, LITOVSKY R, ASSMANN P. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116:1081-1091, 2004.
55. TONG YC, CLARK GM. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74:73-80, 1985.
56. TOWNSHEND B, COTTER N, COMPERNOLLE DV, WHITE RL. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82:106-115, 1987.
57. VAN WIERINGEN A, CARLYON RP, LONG CJ, WOUTERS J. Pitch of amplitude-modulated irregular-rate stimuli in electric and acoustic hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:1516-1528, 2003.
58. VLIEGEN J, OXENHAM AJ. Sequential stream segregation in the absence of spectral cues. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:339-346, 1999.
59. VLIEGEN J, MOORE BCJ, OXENHAM AJ. The role of spectral and periodicity cues in auditory stream segregation, measured using a temporal discrimination task. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106:938-945, 1999.
60. ZENG F-G. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hear. Res. 174:101-106, 2002.