Bovine pericardial versus porcine stented replacement aortic valves: Early results of a randomized comparison of the Perimount and the Mosaic valves

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 136, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1142-1148

  Chambers, John B ^a   Rajani, Ronak ^a   Parkin, Denise ^a   Rimington, Helen M ^a   Blauth, Christopher I ^a   Venn, Graham E ^a   Young, Christopher P ^a   Roxburgh, James C ^a  

^a GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CARPENTIER EDWARDS BIOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANIMALS; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; BIOPROSTHESIS; CATTLE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERICARDIUM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; STENTS; SWINE;

EID: 56249089987     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.086     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Gonzalez-Juanatey J.R., Garcia-Bengoechea J.B., Vega M., Rubio J., Sierra J., Duran D., et al. Echocardiographic features of the normofunctioning Labcor-Santiago pericardial bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 3 (1994) 548-555
2. Dumesnil J.G., Honos G.N., Lemieux M., and Beauchemin J. Validation and application of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 16 (1990) 637-643
3. Williams G.A., and Labovitz A.J. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves. Am J Cardiol 56 (1985) 325-332
4. Cochran R., and Kunzelman K. Discrepancies between labeled and actual dimensions of prosthetic valves and sizers. Card Surg 11 (1996) 318-324
5. Eichinger W.B., Botzenhardt F., Keithahn A., Guenzinger R., Bleiziffer S., Wagner I., et al. Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129 (2005) 1056-1063
6. Seitelberger R., Bialy J., Gottardi R., Gernot S., Reinhard M., Martina M., et al. Relation between size of prosthetic and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25 (2004) 358-363
7. Sahn D.J., De Maria A., Kisslo J., Weyman A.E., and the Committee on M-mode Standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 58 (1978) 1072-1081
8. Edmunds L.H., Clark R.E., Cohn L.H., Grunkemeier G.L., Miller D.C., and Weisel R.D. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 62 (1996) 932-935
9. Ware J.E. Conceptualizing and measuring generic health outcomes. Cancer 67 (1991) 774-779
10. In: Stewart A.L., and Ware J.E. (Eds). Measuring functioning and well-being (1992), Duke University Press, Durham
11. Zigmond A.S., and Snaith R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiat Scand 67 (1983) 61-70
12. Butland R.J.A., Pang J., Gross E.R., Woodcock A.A., and Geddes E.M. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J 284 (1982) 1607-1608
13. Mullaby C.J., Schaff H.V., Orszlak T.A., and Miller F.A. Early clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of aortic Intact porcine bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 3 (1994) 641-647
14. Eichinger W.B., Schutz A., Simmerl D., Gansera B.U., Breuer M., Haslinger B., et al. The Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: hemodynamic performance after 2 years. Ann Thorac Surg 66 (1998) S126-S129
15. Jamieson W.R., Janusz M.T., MacNab J., and Henderson C. Hemodynamic comparison of second- and third-generation stented bioprosthetses in aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 71 (2001) S282-S284
16. Corbineau H., Lelong B., Langanay T., Verhoye J.P., and Leguerrier A. Echocardiographic assessment and preliminary clinical results after aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 10 (2001) 171-176
17. Eichinger W., Gunzinger R., Botzenhardt F., Simmerl D., Gansera B., and Kemkes B.M. The Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position at five years. J Heart Valve Dis 9 (2000) 653-660
18. Fradet G.J., Bleese N., Busse E., Jamieson E., Raudkivi P., Goldstein J., et al. The Mosaic valve clinical performance at seven years: results from a multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Heart Valve Dis 13 (2004) 239-246
19. Thomson D.J., Jamieson W.R.E., Dumesnil J.G., Burgess J.J., Peniston C.M., Metras J., et al. Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: midterm investigational trial results. Ann Thorac Surg 71 (2001) S269-S272
20. Wong S.P., Leggett M.E., Greaves S.C., Barratt-Boyes B.G., Milsom F.P., and Raudkivi P.J. Early experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis: a new generation porcine valve. Ann Thorac Surg 69 (2000) 1846-1850
21. Gansera B., Botzenhardt F., Gunzinger R., Spiliopoulos K., Angelis I., and Kemkes B.M. The Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: seven years' results. J Heart Valve Dis 12 (2003) 354-361
22. Walther T., Lehmann S., Fal V., Metz S., Doll N., Rastan A., et al. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stented xenograft hemodynamic function in the aortic position. Circulation 110 11 Suppl 1 (2004) II74-II78
23. Dellgren G., David T.E., Raanani E., Armstrong S., Ivanov J., and Rakowski H. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124 (2002) 146-154
24. Chambers J., Roxburgh J., Blauth C., O'Riordan J., Hodson F., and Rimington H. A randomized comparison of the MCRI On-X and Carbomedics "Top Hat" bileaflet mechanical replacement aortic valves: early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130 (2005) 759-764
25. Ware J.E., and Kosinski M. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: a manual for users of version 1. 2nd ed (2001), QualityMetric Incorporated: Lincoln [RI] ISBN 1-891810-09-X
26. Phillips R.C., and Lansky D.J. Outcomes management in heart valve replacement surgery: early experience. J Heart Valve Dis 1 (1992) 42-50
27. Blais C., Dumesnil J.G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., and Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108 (2003) 983-988
28. Tasca G., Mhagna Z., Perotti S., Centurini P.B., Sabatini T., Amaducci A., et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 113 (2006) 570-576
29. Mohty D., Malouf J.F., Girard S.E., Schaff H.V., Grill D.E., Enriquez-Sarano M.E., et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St. Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 113 (2006) 420-426
30. Dalmau M.J., Maria Gonzalez-Santos J., Lopez-Rodriguez J., Bueno M., Arribas A., and Nieto F. One year hemodynamic performance of the Perimount Magna pericardial xenograft and the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: a prospective randomized study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6 (2007) 345-349