A randomized comparison of the MCRI On-X and CarboMedics Top Hat bileaflet mechanical replacement aortic valves: Early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 130, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 759-764

  Chambers, J ^a,b   Roxburgh, J ^a   Blauth, C ^a   O'Riordan, J ^a   Hodson, F ^a   Rimington, H ^a  

^a GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HEMOLYSIS; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CHOLESTEROL, LDL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 24644520436     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.02.057     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. X.Y. Jin, Z.M. Zhang, D.G. Gibson, M.H. Yacoub, J.R. Pepper Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 62 1996 683 690
2. V. Rao, W.R. Jamieson, J. Ivanov, S. Armstrong, T.E. David Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement Circulation 102 19 Suppl 3 2000 III5 III9
3. Z. Wang, N. Grainger, J. Chambers Doppler echocardiography in normally functioning replacement heart valves a literature review J Heart Valve Dis 4 1995 591 614
4. P. Pibarot, J.G. Dumesnil Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention J Am Coll Cardiol 36 2000 1131 1141
5. R. DePaulis, L. Sommariva, F. Russo Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic anulus and valve prosthesis-body surface area mismatch J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 108 1994 57 62
6. J.B. Chambers, L. Oo, A. Narracott, P.M. Lawford, C.I. Blauth Nominal size in six bileaflet mechanical aortic valves a comparison of orifice size and biologic equivalence J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125 2003 1388 1393
7. B.L. Troy, J. Pombo, C.E. Rackley Measurement of left ventricular wall thickness and mass by echocardiography Circulation 1972 45602 45611
8. I.W. Hammond, R.B. Devereux, M.H. Alderman, E.M. Lutas, M.C. Spitzer, J.S. Crowley The prevalence and correlates of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy among employed patients with uncomplicated hypertension J Am Coll Cardiol 7 1988 639 650
9. L.H. Edmunds, R.E. Clark, L.H. Cohn, G.L. Grunkemeier, D.C. Millar, R.D. Weisel Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112 1996 708 711
10. J.M. Bernal, R. Martin-Duran, J.M. Rabasa, J.M. Revuelta The CarboMedics "Top-Hat" supraannular prosthesis Ann Thorac Surg 67 1999 1299 1303
11. R. Lundblad, O.M. Hagen, G. Smith, K. Kvernebo The CarboMedics supraannular top hat valve improves prosthesis size in the aortic root J Heart Valve Dis 10 2001 196 201
12. A.M. Gillinov, E.H. Blackstone, J.M. Alster, J.M. Craver, W.A. Baumgartner, S.A. Brewster The Carbomedics Top Hat supraannular aortic valve a multicenter study Ann Thorac Surg 75 2003 1175 1180
13. A. Laczkovics, M. Heidt, H. Oelert, G. Laufer, H. Greve, J.L. Pomar Early experience with the On-X prosthetic heart valve J Heart Valve Dis 10 2001 94 99
14. T. Walther, V. Falk, R. Tigges, M. Kruger, G. Langebartels, A. Diegeler Comparison of On-X and SJM HP bileaflet aortic valves J Heart Valve Dis 9 2000 403 407
15. J. Aagaard, J. Tingleff, C.N. Hansen, M.A. Noergaard, C.E. Rasmussen Twelve years' clinical experience with the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve J Heart Valve Dis 10 2001 177 189
16. G. Cohen, G.T. Christakis, K.J. Buth, C.D. Joyner, C.D. Morgan, J.Y. Sever Early experience with stentless versus stented valves Circulation 96 9 Suppl 1997 II76 II82
17. F. Santini, P. Bertolini, G. Montalbano, B. Vecchi, R. Pessotto, A. Prioli Hancock versus stentless bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients older than 75 years Ann Thorac Surg 66 6 Suppl 1998 S99 S103
18. J.M. Gardin How reliable are serial echocardiographic measurements in detecting regression in left ventricular hypertrophy and changes in function? J Am Coll Cardiol 34 1999 1633 1636
19. O. Lund, K. Emmertsen, I. Dorup, F.T. Jensen, C. Flo Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy during 10 years after valve replacement for aortic stenosis is related to the preoperative risk profile Eur Heart J 24 2003 1437 1446
20. D. Birnbaum, A. Laczovics, M. Heidt, H. Oelert, G. Laufer, H. Greve Examination of haemolytic potential with the On-X prosthetic heart valve J Heart Valve Dis 9 2000 142 145
21. E. Myhre, J. Dale, K. Rasmussen Erythrocyte destruction in different types of Starr-Edwards aortic ball valves Circulation 42 1970 515 520
22. J. Skoularigis, M.R. Essop, D. Skudicky, S.J. Middlemost, P. Sareli Frequency and severity of intravascular hemolysis after left-sided cardiac valve replacement with Medtronic Hall and St Jude Medical prostheses, and influence of prosthetic type, position, size and number Am J Cardiol 71; 1993 587 591