Vulnerability of chemical installations to external threats

Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference 2007, ESREL 2007 - Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages 2565-2570

  Heikkila A M ^a   Schabel, J ^a  

^a VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES; CHEMICAL INSTALLATIONS; EXTERNAL-; INTERNAL CHANGES; PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS; WEATHER CONDITIONS;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL OPERATIONS; INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS; RELIABILITY; RISK MANAGEMENT;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 56149119293     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. ACC (2001). Site Security Guidelines for the U.S. Chemical Industry. American Chemistry Council, Washington, DC. 60p. (at: http://www.chlorineinstitute.org/Files/PDFs/SecurityguidanceACC1.pdf) [visited on 15.2.2007].
2. Bajpai, S. and Gupta, J.P. (2005). Site security for chemical process industries. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 18, Issues 4-6, pp. 301-309.
3. Baybutt, P. and Reddy, V. (2003). Strategies for protecting process plants against terrorism, sabotage and other criminal acts. Primatech Inc. (at: http://primatech.com/info/ paper_strategies_for_protecting_process_plants_against_terrorism_sabotage_ and_other_criminal_acts.pdf) [visited on 15.2.2007].
4. CCPS (1992). Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, 2nd ed. with worked examples. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York.
5. CCPS (2000). Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry: A User's Guide to Quantitative Risk Analysis. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Center for Chemical Process Safety, New York.
6. Coster, M.N. and Hankin, R.K.S. (2003). Risk assessment of antagonistic hazards, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 16, pp. 545-550.
7. Council Directive 94/9/EC on Equipment and Protective systems intended for use in Potentially Explosive Atmospheres (ATEX), Official Journal of the European Communities No. L 100 of 19 April 1994.
8. Council Directive 96/61/EC on integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC Directive), Official Journal of the European Communities No. L 257, 10 October 1996.
9. Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances (SEVESO II Directive), Official Journal of the European Communities No. L 10, 14 January 1997.
10. Council Directive 97/23/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning pressure equipment (Pressure Equipment Directive), Official Journal of the European Communities No. L 181, 9 July 1997.
11. Council Directive 99/92/EC on minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres, Official Journal of the European Communities No. L 023, 28 January 2000 P. 0057-0064.
12. Crawley, F. and Tyler, B. (2003). Hazard Identification Methods. European Process Safety Centre.
13. Delvosalle, Ch. (1996). Domino Effects Phenomena: Definition, Overview and Classification. Proceedings of the European Seminar on Domino Effects, Leuven. Federal Ministry of Employment, Safety Administration, Direction of Chemical risks, Brussels. pp. 5-15.
14. EPSC (2000). Safety Health Environment Management Systems for Small to Medium-Sized Enterprises. European Process Safety Centre.
15. Garrick, B.J., Hall, J.E., Kilger, M., McDonald, J.C., O'Toole, T., Probst, P.S., Rindskopf Parker, E., Rosenthal, R., Trivelpiece, A.W., Van Arsdale, L.A., Zebroski, E.L. (2004). Confronting the risks of terrorism: making the right decisions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 86. pp. 129-176.
16. Heikkilä, A.-M. and Nordvik, J.-P. (2006). Demonstrator for assessing the vulnerability of chemical installations against intentional acts. Scientific and Technical Research series, EUR 22204 EN, European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. 27p.
17. Lees, F.P. (1980). Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. Butterworths, London.
18. Lees, F.P. (1996). Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2nd Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
19. Mannan, M.S. (2005). Lees' Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 3rd Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann.
20. OECD (2003). OECD Guiding Principles for Chemical Accident Prevention, Preparedness and Response. 2nd Ed. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Series on Chemical Accidents No. 10. Paris. 209p.
21. Reniers, G.L.L., Dullaert, W., Ale, B.J.M. and Soudan, K. (2005a). The use of current risk analysis tools evaluated towards preventing external domino accidents. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 18, Issue 3, May 2005, pp. 119-126.
22. Reniers, G.L.L., Dullaert, W., Ale, B.J.M. and Soudan, K. (2005b). Developing an external domino accident prevention framework: Hazwim. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 18, Issue 3, May 2005, pp. 127-138.
23. SHAPE-RISK project - http://shaperisk.jrc.it/ [visited on 15.2.2007].
24. Urso, J. (2006). Plant Security Vulnerability. Chemical Engineering Progress, May 2006, Vol. 102, No. 5, pp. 16-17.
25. Walker, G., Mooney, J., and Pratts, D. (2000). The people and the hazard: the spatial context of major accident hazard management in Britain. Applied Geography, 20, pp. 119-135.
26. Whitely, J.R.R. and Mannan, M.S. (2004), Initial perspectives on process threat management, J. Haz. Mat. 115, pp. 163-167.