The use of current risk analysis tools evaluated towards preventing external domino accidents

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 119-126

  Reniers, G L L ^a   Dullaert, W ^a   Ale, B J M ^b   Soudan, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chemical Seveso industry; Domino accidents; Domino effects; Major accidents; Risk; Risk analysis procedures; Risk analysis tools; Seveso Directive

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; PUBLIC POLICY;

DOMINO ACCIDENTS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ANALYSIS TOOLS; SAFETY POLICY;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

SAFETY;

EID: 21944451130     PISSN: 09504230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. D.F. Bagster, and R.M. Pitblado The estimation of domino incident frequencies - an approach Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers 69 B 1991
2. H. Baksteen Instrument domino effecten 2003 RIVM Bilthoven, The Netherlands
3. M. Baram Process safety management and the implications of organisational change A. Hale M. Baram Safety management. The challenge of change 1998 Pergamon Press Oxford
4. Bottelbergs, P. H. B. & Ale, B. J. M. (1996). Consideration of Domino effects in the implementation of the Seveso II directive in the Netherlands. In: Administration of labour safety, Proceedings of the European seminar on Domino effects, Leuven (pp. 36). Brussels: Ministry of Employment and Labour.
5. Center for Chemical Process Safety Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures 2nd ed. 1992 American Institute of Chemical Engineers New York
6. Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, official journal No. L 010 of 14 January 1997.
7. V.T. Covello, and M.W. Merkhofer Risk assessment methods 1993 Plenum Press New York
8. Delvosalle, Ch. (1996). Domino effects phenomena: Definition, overview and classification. In: Administration of labour safety, Proceedings of the European seminar on Domino effects, Leuven (pp. 5). Brussels: Ministry of Employment and Labour.
9. P. De Pelsmacker, and P. Van Kenhove Marktonderzoek. Methoden en Toepassingen 3rd ed. 1999 Garant Leuven-Apeldoorn
10. P. Dorman If safety pays, why don't employers invest in it? K. Frick P.L. Jensen M. Quinlan T. Wilthagen Systematic occupational health and safety management 2000 Pergamon Press Oxford
11. H.R. Greenberg, and J.J. Cramer Risk assessment and risk management for the chemical process industry 1991 Wiley New York
12. Kullman, E. J. (2002). Methods, procedures and instruments of prevention. In: Proceedings of the 16th world congress on safety and health at work, Vienna. Available on CD-ROM.
13. F.P. Lees Loss prevention in the process industries 2nd ed. 1996 Butterworths/Heinemann London
14. N. Pidgeon, and M. O'Leary Man-made disasters: Why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail Safety Science 34 1-3 2000 15 30
15. G. Reniers, W. Dullaert, K. Soudan, and B. Ale Developing an external Domino accident prevention framework: hazwim Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process 2005
16. Seveso II Directive Amendments, 2003/105/EC.
17. R.K. Sinnott Safety and loss prevention R.K. Sinnott 2nd ed. Coulson & Richardson's chemical engineering vol. 6 1996 Butterworth/Heinemann London
18. D.S. Tull, and D.I. Hawkins Marketing research. Measurement and method 1993 MacMillan New York
19. G. Walker, J. Mooney, and D. Pratts The people and the hazard: The spatial context of major accident hazard management in Britain Applied Geography 20 2000 119 135
20. G. Wells Major hazards and their management 1999 Institution of Chemical Engineers Rugby, UK