Initial perspectives on process threat management

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 115, Issue 1-3 SPEC. ISS., 2004, Pages 163-167

  Whiteley, James R Rob ^a   Mannan, M Sam ^b  

^a Oklahoma State University   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical facility vulnerability assessment; Counter terrorism; Hazard analysis; Process safety; Process threat management

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; PROCESS CONTROL; RISK MANAGEMENT;

PUBLIC WELFARE; THREAT MANAGEMENT;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION;

PETROLEUM;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; TERRORISM;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CONFERENCE PAPER; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY; PROCESS TECHNOLOGY; SOCIAL SECURITY; SOCIAL WELFARE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TERRORISM; THREAT; UNITED STATES;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CRIME; DISASTER PLANNING; HUMANS; RISK MANAGEMENT; SEPTEMBER 11 TERRORIST ATTACKS; TERRORISM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 7044246035     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.05.011     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. American Chemistry Council, Chlorine Institute, and Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Association, Site Security Guidelines for the US Chemical Industry, 2001.
2. American Petroleum Institute, Security Guidelines for the Petroleum Industry, 2003.
3. President's Office of Homeland Security, http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/ physical_strategy.pdf, The National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets, 2003.
4. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Announces Homeland Security Strategic Plan, One of Many Efforts to Ensure Agency's Ability to Protect, Respond and Recover, EPA Newsroom, http://www.epa.gov/epahome/headline_100202. htm (2 October 2002).
5. E. Pianin, Study Assesses Risk of Attack on Chemical Plant, Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A10616-2002Mar11 (12 March 2002), p. A08.
6. A. Kostant, Terrorist Attack on Chemical Plants could Endanger Millions, Environmental Media Services, http://www.ems.org/chemical_plants/zz.ems.02.06. 20.html (20 June 2002).
7. Department of Health & Human Services - Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, http://www.mapcruzin.com/scruztri/docs/cep1118992.htm, Industrial Chemicals and Terrorism: Human Health Threat Analysis, Mitigation and Prevention, 1999.
8. J.B. Stephenson, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03439.pdf, Homeland Security: Voluntary Initiatives are under Way at Chemical Facilities, but the Extent of Security Preparedness is Unknown, GAO-03-439, US General Accounting Office, 2003.
9. L.-J. Schierow, http://www.ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/03Jan/IB10067. pdf, Chemical Plant Security, Order Code RL31530, Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress, 2003.
10. National Infrastructure Protection Center, Homeland Security Information Update, Information Bulletin 03-003, 2003.
11. M. Weinstock, http://www.govexec.com/features/0203/0203s2.htm.
12. Teumim D.J. Chem. Eng. Prog. 98:2002;69
13. R.F. Dacey, Critical Infrastructure Protection: Significant Challenges in Developing Analysis, Warning, and Response Capabilities, in Subcommittee on Technology, Terrorism, and Government Information, Committee on the Judiciary, United States General Accounting Office, Washington, 2001.
14. http://www.gmu.edu/departments/law/techcenter/programs/cipp/cip_report. html.
15. Marszal E.M. Chem Eng. 110:2003;42
16. D. Heinold, D. Smith, http://www.ensr.com/newsroom/insight/ insight_articles/2002_v3/v3a1.htm.
17. Schwartz J. Adhes. Age. 45:2002;12
18. Baybutt P. Chem. Eng. 110:2003;48
19. Ragan P.T., Kilburn M.E., Roberts S.H., Kimmerle N.A. Chem. Eng. Prog. 98:2002;62
20. Baybutt P. Process. Saf. Prog. 21:2002;269
21. Baybutt P., Ready V. Homeland Defense J. 2:2003;1
22. M.S. Mannan, D. Hendershot, T.A. Kletz, in: R.G. Anthony (Ed.), Fundamentals of Process Safety and Risk Management, vol. 69, Suppl. 1, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 2002, p. 49.
23. D.A. Crowl and J.F. Louvar, Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990.
24. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1989.
25. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, Second Edition with Worked Examples, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1992.
26. Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Consequence Analysis of Chemical Releases, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1999.
27. G. Wells, Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment, Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, Warwickshire, UK, 1996.