Comparison of nutrient intake between different dietary assessment methods in elderly male volunteers

Nutrition and Dietetics

Volumn 65, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 266-271

  Johansson, Gunnar ^a  

^a SWEDISH INSTITUTE FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASE CONTROL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dietary assessment method; Misreporting; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 56149089695     PISSN: 14466368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2008.00317.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Johansson G, Callmer E, Gustafsson J-Å. Validity of repeated dietary measurements in a dietary intervention study. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992; 46: 717-28.
2. Black AE, Bingham SA, Johansson G, Coward WA. Validation of dietary intakes of protein and energy against 24-hour urinary N and DLW energy expenditure in middle-aged women, retired men and post-obese subjects: comparisons with validation against presumed energy requirements. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997; 51: 405-13.
3. Johansson G, Åkesson A, Berglund M, Nermell B, Vahter M. Validation with biological markers for food intake of a dietary assessment method used by Swedish women with three different dietary preferences. Public Health Nutr 1998; 1: 199-206.
4. Johansson G, Wikman Å, Åhrén A-M, Hallmans G, Johansson I. Underreporting of energy intake in repeated 24-hour recalls related to gender, age, weight status, day of interview, educational level, reported food intake, smoking habits and area of living. Public Health Nutr 2001; 4: 919-27.
5. Ritenbaugh C, Harrison G. Reactivity of garbage analysis. Am Behav Sci 1984; 28: 51-70.
6. Lafay L, Mennen L, Basdevant A, Charles MA, Borys JM, Eschwège E. Does energy intake underreporting involve all kinds of food or only specific food items? Results from the Fleurbaix Lavantie Ville Santé(FLVS) study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 1500-06.
7. Poppitt SD, Swann D, Black AE, Prentice AM. Assessment of selective under-reporting of food intake by both obese and non-obese women in a metabolic facility. Int J Obes 1998; 22: 303-11.
8. Black AE. Critical, evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: Basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes 2000; 24: 1119-30.
9. Black AE. The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000; 54: 395-404.
10. Hebert JR, Clemow L, Pbert L, Ockene IS, Ockene JK. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J epidemiol 1995; 24: 389-98.
11. Bingham SA, Gill C, Welch A et al. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutrititional epidemiology: Weighed records v. 24hours recalls, food frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. Br J Nutr 1994; 72: 619-43.
12. Bingham SA. The dietary assessment of individuals; methods accuracy, new techniques and recommendations. Nutr Abst Rev 1987; 57A: 705-42.
13. Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer M et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 122: 51-65.
14. National Food Survey Committee. Annual Report of Household Food Consumption and Expenditure. London: H.M. Stationary Office, 1982.
15. Crawley H. Food Portion Sizes. London: H.M. Stationary Office, 1988.
16. James WPT, Ferro-Luzzi A, Waterlow JC. Definition of chronic energy deficiency in adults. Report of a working party of the International Dietary Energy Consultancy Group. Eur J Clin Nutr 1988; 42: 969-81.
17. Department of Health. Dietary Reference Values for Food. Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom. Report on Health and Social Subjects. London: HMSO, 1991.
18. Goldberg GR, Black AE, Jebb SA et al. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principals of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr 1991; 45: 569-81.
19. Black AE, Goldberg GR, Jebb SA, Livingstone MBE, Prentice AM. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principals of energy physiology: 2. Evaluating the results of dietary surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 1991; 45: 569-81.
20. Rennie KL, Coward A, Jebb S. Estimating under-reporting of energy intake in dietary surveys using an individualised method. Br J Nutr 2007; 97: 1169-76.
21. Maurer J, Taren DL, Teixeira PJ et al. The psychosocial and behavioural characteristics related to energy misreporting. Nutr Rev 2006; 64: 53-66.
22. Black AE, Cole TJ. Biased over- or under-reporting is characteristic of individuals whether over time or by different assessment methods. Am J Diet Assoc 2001; 101: 70-80.
23. Bazelmans C, Matthys C, De Henauw S et al. Predictors of misreporting in an elderly population: The 'Quality of life after 65' study. Public Health Nutr 2007; 10: 185-91.
24. Vukovic N, Ritenbaugh C, Taren DL, Tobar M. A qualitative study of participants' experiences with dietary assessments. J Am Diet Assoc 2000; 100: 1023-8.
25. Smith AF, Jobe JB. Validity of reports of long-term dietary memories: data and model. In: Autobiographical Memory and the Validity of Retrospective Reports. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993; 121-40.