A business process intelligence system for enterprise process performance management

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 745-756

  Tan, WenAn ^a,b,c   Shen, Weiming ^d   Xu, Lida ^e   Zhou, Bosheng ^f   Li, Ling ^e  

^a ZHEJIANG NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHANGHAI SECOND POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

^d NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

^e OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Dynamic enterprise process modeling (DEPM); Flow analysis and prediction; Process measurement; Process performance evaluation

Indexed keywords

COST ACCOUNTING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; FORECASTING; PROCESS ENGINEERING;

ACTIVITY FLOWS; BUSINESS PROCESS INTELLIGENCES; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; BUSINESS PROCESSES; CASH FLOWS; COST FLOWS; DYNAMIC PROCESSES; ENTERPRISE PROCESS MODELING; ENTERPRISE PROCESSES; EVALUATION CRITERIONS; FLOW ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION; INFORMATION FLOWS; MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES; MEASUREMENT MODELS; PROCESS EXECUTIONS; PROCESS FLOWS; PROCESS MEASUREMENT; PROCESS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PROCESS PERFORMANCES; PROTOTYPE SYSTEMS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 56049089609     PISSN: 10946977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSMCC.2008.2001571     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. W. E. Deming, Out of Crisis (MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.
2. B. McFeely, IDEAL: A User's Guide for Software Process Improvement Handbook CMU/SEI-96-HB-001. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon Univ., 1996.
3. W. A. Shewhart, Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product New York: Van Nostrand, 1931.
4. R. Bate, D. Kuhn, C. Wells et al., A Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model, Version1.1 (CMU/SEI-95-MM-003). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon Univ., 1995.
5. V. R. Basili and H. D. Rombach, "The TAME project: Toward improvement-oriented software environment," IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 58-73, Jun. 1988.
6. AMI Consortium, The AMI Handbook: A Quantitative Approach to Software Management. London, U.K.: South Bank Polytech, 1992.
7. K. Pulford, A. Kuntzmann-Cambelles, and S. Shrilow, A Quantitative Approach to Software Management: The AMI Handbook. Wokingham, U.K.: Addison-Wesley, 1996.
8. R. E. Park, W. B. Goethert, and W. A. Florac, Goal-Driven Software Measurement - A Guidebook, Handbook CMU/SEI-96-HB-002. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon Univ., 1996.
9. M. G. Mendonca, V. R. Bhandari, and J. Dawson, "An approach to improving existing measurement frameworks," IBM Syst. J., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 484-501, 1998.
10. C. Moller, "Process innovation laboratory: A new approach to business process innovation based on enterprise information systems," Enterprise Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 113-128, 2007.
11. C. S. Leem and I. Kim, "An integrated evaluation system based on the continuous improvement model of IS performance," Ind. Manage. Data Syst., vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 115-128, 2004.
12. M. Hammer, "Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate," Harvard Bus. Rev., vol. 68, pp. 104-112, 1990.
13. M. Hammer and S. A. Stanton, The Reengineering Revolution - A Handbook. New York: Harper Collins, 1995.
14. M. Y. Cheng and M. H. Tsai, "Reengineering of construction management process," J. Construction Eng. Manage., vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 105-114, Jan. 2003.
15. L. Fitzgerald, R. Johnson, S. Brignall, R. Silvestro, and C. Voss, Performance Measurement in Service Business. London, U.K.: CIMA, 1991.
16. R. Lynch and K. Cross, Measure Up - The Essential Guide to Measuring Business Performance. London, U.K.: Mandarin, 1991.
17. P. Bradley, "A performance measurement approach to the reengineering of manufacturing enterprises," Ph.D. dissertation, Comput. Integr. Manuf. Res. Unit (CIMRU), Nat. Univ. Ireland (NUI), Galway, Ireland, 1996.
18. P. Folan and J. Browne, "A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management," Comput. Ind., vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 663-680, 2005.
19. Z. Feng, S. Eugene Jr., and B. L. Peter, "A performance study on a multi-agent e-scheduling and coordination framework for maintenance networks," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 52-65, Jan. 2007.
20. N. Zribi, I. Kacem, A. E. Kamel, and P. Borne, "Assignment and scheduling in flexible job-shops by hierarchical optimization," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 652-661, Aug. 2007.
21. W. Shen, S. Lang, and L. Wang, "iShopFloor: An Internet-enabled agentbased intelligent shop," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 371-381, Aug. 2005.
22. W. Shen, L. Wang, and Q. Hao, "Agent-based distributed manufacturing process planning and scheduling: A state-of-the-art survey," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 563-577, Jul. 2006.
23. D. Grigori, F. Casati, M. Castellanos, U. Dayal, M. Sayal, andM. C. Shan, "Business process intelligence," Comput. Ind., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 321-343, Apr. 2004.
24. M. Castellanos, F. Casati, U. Dayal, and M. C. Shan, "A comprehensive and automated approach to intelligent business process execution analysis," Distrib. Parallel Databases, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 239-273, Nov. 2004.
25. D. Amaratunga and D. Baldry, "Moving from performance measurement to performance management," Facilities, vol. 20, no. 5/6, pp. 217-223, 2002.
26. P. Smith andM. Goddard, "Performancemanagement and opera-research: A marriage made in heaven?," J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 247-255, 2002.
27. M. R. Ostrenga, T. R. Ozan, R. D. Mcllhattan, and M. D. Harwood, The Ernst & Young Guide to Total Cost Management. New York, Wiley, 1992.
28. R. T. Yeh and R. T. Mittermeir, "A commonsense management model," IEEE Softw., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 23-33, Nov. 1991.
29. W. A. Tan, "A study and development for dynamic optimizing enterprise process technique and its supporting environment," Ph.D. dissertation, Beihang Univ., Beijing, China, 2001.
30. W. A. Tan, R. B. Chen, W. Shen, J. Zhao, and Q. Hao, "An agent-based collaborative enterprise modeling environment supporting enterprise process evolution," in Proc. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work in Design III. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4402, 2007, pp. 217-226.
31. ESPRIT Consortium AMICE, CIMOSA: Open System Architecture for CIM. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
32. W. A. Tan, S. Li, L. G. Zeng, and W. Shen, "A dynamic PERT/CPM technique with compound number supporting enterprise process flexible scheduling," in Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Design Manuf., Harbin, China, Jan. 2006, pp. 197-202.
33. W. A. Tan, B. S. Zhou, and M. S. Li, "Research on simulation-based auto-optimization techniques in enterprise process modeling," J. Softw., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 706-712, 2002.
34. R. Kimball, The Data Warehouse Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Building Dimensional Data Warehouse. New York: Wiley, 1996.
35. A. Sen and A. P. Sinha, "Toward developing data warehousing process standards: An ontology-based review of existing methodologies," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 17-31, Jan. 2007.
36. A. M. Howard, "A systematic approach to predict performance of humanautomation systems," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 594-561, Jul. 2007.
37. J. M. Yelena and A. R. Probst, "Business concepts ontology for an enterprise performance and competences monitoring," Comput. Ind., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 118-129, 2007.
38. W. Shen, D. H. Norrie, and J. P. Barthes, Multi-Agent Systems for Concurrent Intelligent Design and Manufacturing. London, U.K.: Taylor & Francis, 2001.