When temporal contiguity matters: A moderator of the predictive validity of implicit measures

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 246-253

  Richetin, Juliette ^a   Perugini, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accessibility; IAT; Methodological moderator; Predictive validity; SC IAT

Indexed keywords

EID: 55949121839     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.246     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bargh, J.A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912.
2. Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (in press). Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): Assessing automatic affect toward multiple attitude objects. European Journal of Social Psychology.
3. Conner, M., Perugini, M., O'Gorman, R., Ayres, K., & Prestwich, A. (2008). Relations between implicit and explicit measures of attitudes and measures of behavior: Evidence of moderation by individual difference variables. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1727-1740.
4. Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J.A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 1-40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Fazio, R.H. (1993). Variability in the likelihood of automatic attitude activation: Data reanalysis and commentary on Bargh, Chaiken, Govender, and Pratto (1992). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 753-758.
6. Fazio, R.H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115-141.
7. Florack, A., Scarabis, M., & Bless, H. (2001). When do associations matter? The use of automatic associations toward ethnic groups in person judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 518-524.
8. Friese, M., & Hofmann, W. (2008). When and why do implicit reaction-time measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of motivation, opportunity, and process reliance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. Friese, M., Wänke, M., & Plessner, H. (2006). Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice. Psychology and Marketing, 23, 727-740.
10. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731.
11. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.K.L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
12. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
13. Greenwald, A.G., Poehlman, T.A., Uhlmann, E.L., & Banaji, M.R. (in press). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
14. Higgins, E.T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E.T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
15. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385.
16. Hofmann, W., Rauch, W., & Gawronski, B. (2006). And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 497-504.
17. Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R.B. (2006). The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16-32.
18. Nosek, B.A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565-584.
19. Perugini, M. (2005). Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 29-45.
20. Perugini, M., & Prestwich, A. (2007). The gatekeeper: Individual differences in the chain from perception to behavior. European Journal of Personality, 21, 303-317.
21. Perugini, M., O'Gorman, R., & Prestwich, A. (2007). An ontological test of the IAT: Self-activation can increase predictive validity. Experimental Psychology, 54, 134-147.
22. Richetin, J., Perugini, M., Adjali, I., & Hurling, R. (2007). The moderator role of intuitive versus deliberative decision making for the predictive validity of implicit and explicit measures. European Journal of Personality, 21, 529-546.
23. Richetin, J., Perugini, M., Prestwich, A., & O'Gorman, R. (2007). The IAT as a predictor of spontaneous food choice: The case of fruits versus snacks. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 166-173.
24. Ruys, K., Dijksterhuis, A.. & Corneille, O. (2008). On the (mis)categorization of unattractive brides and attractive prostitutes: Extending evaluative congruency effects to social category activation. Experimental Psychology, 55, 182-188.
25. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Wänke, M., & Winkielman, P. (2003). Accessibility revised. In G.V. Bodenhausen & A.J. Lambert (Eds.), Foundations of social cognition: A Festschrift in honor of Robert S. Wyer, Jr. (pp. 51-77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
27. Steiger, J.H., (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.