A conjoined thienopyrrole oligomer formed by using DNA as a molecular guide

Organic Letters

Volumn 10, Issue 17, 2008, Pages 3657-3660

  Srinivasan, Selvi ^a   Schuster, Gary B ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANILINE DERIVATIVE; CYTOSINE; DNA; DRUG DERIVATIVE; HORSERADISH PEROXIDASE; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE; POLYMER; POLYPYRROLE; PYRROLE DERIVATIVE; THIENOPYRROLE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SYNTHESIS; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

ANILINE COMPOUNDS; BASE SEQUENCE; CYTOSINE; DNA; HORSERADISH PEROXIDASE; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDES; POLYMERS; PYRROLES; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET;

EID: 55949108208     PISSN: 15237060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ol801137t     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Chen, J.; Seeman, N. C. Nature 1991, 350, 631-633.
2. Lin, C.; Ke, Y.; Liu, Y.; Mertig, M.; Gu, J.; Yan, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6089-6092.
3. Mirkin, C. A.; Letsinger, R. L.; Mucic, R. C.; Storhoff, J. J. Nature 1996, 382, 607-609.
4. Simmel, F. C.; Dittmer, W. U. Small 2005, 1, 284-299.
5. Gartner, Z. J.; Tse, B. N.; Grubina, R.; Doyon, J. B.; Snyder, T. M.; Liu, D. R. Science 2004, 305, 1601-1605.
6. Li, X.; Liu, D. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4848-4870.
7. Park, S. H.; Pistol, C.; Ahn, S. J.; Reif, J. H.; Lebeck, A. R.; Dwyer, C.; LaBean, T. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 735-739.
8. Seeman, N. C. Nature 2003, 421, 427-431.
9. Braun. E.; Eichen, Y.; Sivan, U.; Ben-Yoseph, G. Nature 1998, 391, 775-778.
10. Burley, G. A.; Gierlich, J.; Mofid, M. R.; Nir, H.; Tal, S.; Eichen, Y.; Carell, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1398-1399.
11. Nguyen, K.; Monteverde, M.; Filoramo, A.; Goux-Capes, L.; Lyonnais, S.; Jegou, P.; Viel, P.; Goffman, M.; Bourgoin, J.-P. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 1099-1104.
12. Bath, J.; Turberfield, A. J. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 275-284.
13. Liang, X.; Nishioka, H.; Takenaka, N.; Asanuma, H. ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 702-703.
14. Niemeyer, C. M.; Adler, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3779-3783.
15. Cai, L. T.; Tabata, H.; Kawai, T. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 3105-3106.
16. Cai, L. T.; Tabata, H.; Kawai, T. Nanotechnology 2001, 12, 211-216.
17. Porath, D.; Bezryadin, A.; de Vries, S.; Dekker, C. Nature 2000, 403, 635-638.
18. Storm, A. J.; van Noort, J.; de Vries, S.; Dekker, C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 3881-3883.
19. Coffer, J. L.; Bigham, S. R.; Li, X.; Pinizzotto, R. F.; Rho, Y. G.; Pirtle, R. M.; Pirtle, I. L. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1996, 69, 3851-3853.
20. Keren, K.; Herman, R. S.; Buchstab, E.; Sivan, U.; Braun, E. Science 2003, 302, 1380-1382.
21. Keren, K.; Krueger, M.; Gilad, R.; Ben-Yoseph, G.; Sivan, U.; Braun, E. Science 2002, 297, 72-75.
22. Richter, J.; Seidel, R.; Kirsch, R.; Mertig, M.; Pompe, W.; Plaschke, J.; Schackert, H. K. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 507-510.
23. Gu, J. H.; Tanaka, S.; Otsuka, Y.; Tabata, H.; Kawai, T. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 688-690.
24. Lee. H. Y.; Tanaka, H.; Otsuka, Y.; Yoo, K. H.; Lee, J. O.; Kawai, T. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 1670-1672.
25. Dittmer, W. U.; Simmel, F. C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 633-635.
26. Bae, A.-H.; Hatano, T.; Numata, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Shinkai, S. Macromolecules 2005, 39, 1609-1615.
27. Ma, Y. F.; Zhang, J. M.; Zhang, G. J.; He, H. X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7097-7101.
28. Nagarajan, R.; Liu, W.; Kumar, J.; Tripathy. S. K. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 3921-3927.
29. Nickels, P.; Dittmer, W. U.; Beyer, S.; Kotthaus, J. P.; Simmel, F. C. Nanotechnology 2004, 15, 1524-1529.
30. Chen, W.; Josowicz, M.; Datta, B.; Schuster, G. B.; Janata, J. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2008, 11, E11-E14.
31. Datta, B.; Schuster, G. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2965-2973.
32. Lassaroni, R.; De Pryck, A.; Debaisieux, C.; Riga, J.; Verbist, J. Synth. Met. 1987, 21, 189-195.
33. Hemetsberger, H.; Knittel, D. Monatsh. Chem. 1972, 103. 194.
34. Gray, D. M.; Hung, S.-H.; Johnson, K. H. Methods Enzymol. 1995, 246, 19-36.
35. Li, H.; Lambert, C.; Stahl, R. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 2049-2055.
36. Machida, S.; Miyata, S.; Techagumpuch, A. Synth. Met. 1989, 31, 311-318.
37. Differences in the absorption maxima of the oligomer bands shown in Figures 2 and 4 likely result because the former is recorded in citrate buffer solution, the oligomer is constrained by its covalent attatchment to DNA, and its chain length is a maximum of 6 monomer units. Whereas the polymer whose spectrum is shown in Figure 4 is dissolved in acetonitrile solution, its structure is unconstrained and it is composed of a variable number of monomer units. The changes in solvent, structure, and length may be responsible for the 10 nm shift in the observed absorption maxima.