A finite element analysis of ceramic restorations in endodontically treated premolars

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 331-336

  Seow, Liang Lin ^a   Toh, Chooi Gait ^a   Fok, Alex Siu Lun ^b   Wilson, Nairn H F ^c  

^a INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT;

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADHESIVES; BICUSPID; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INLAYS; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 55849098104     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: Application of traditional principles in present and future contexts.[comment]. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:375-380.
2. Smith CT, Schuman N. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A guide for the restorative dentist. Quintessence Int 1997;28:457-462.
3. Wagner J, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Long-term clinical performance and longevity of gold alloy vs ceramic partial crowns. Clin Oral Invest 2003;7:80-85.
4. Mannocci F, Qualtrough M, Worthington HV, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: Five-year results. Oper Dent 2005;30;9-15.
5. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent 1997;10:237-241.
6. Rammelsberg P, Eickemeyer G, Erdelt K, Pospiech P. Fracture resistance of posterior metal-free polymer crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:303-308.
7. Mörmann WH, Bindl A. All-ceramic, chair-side computer-aided design/ computer-aided machining restorations. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:405-426.
8. Burke FJ, Fleming GJ, Nathanson D, Marquis PM. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:7-22.
9. Shor A, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WJ. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:64-69.
10. Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002;33:415-426.
11. Reiss, B. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. Int J Computer Dent 2006;9:11-22.
12. Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: Effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int J Periodont Res Dent 2003;23:543-555.
13. Mörmann WH, Bindl A, Luthy H, Rathke A. Effects of preparation and luting system on all-ceramic computer-generated crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:333-339.
14. Bindl A, Richter B, Mörmann WH. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations with reduced macroretention geometry. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:219-224.
15. Genovese K, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. Finite element analysis of a new customized composite post system for endodontically treated teeth. J Biomechanics 2005;38:2375-2389.
16. Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL, Rengo S. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites. JBiomechanics 2001;34:1269-1277.
17. Lin CL, Chang YH, Chang WJ, Cheng MH. Evaluation of a reinforced slot design for CEREC system to restore extensively compromised premolars. J Dent 2006;34:221-229.
18. Ash M. Wheeler's atlas of tooth form. 5th ed: WB Saunders, Philadelphia; 1984.
19. Shillingburg HT, Jr., Grace CS. Thickness of enamel and dentin. J South Calif Dent Assoc 1973;41:33-36.
20. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Watts DC. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1993;24:875-880.
21. Seow LL, Toh CG, Wilson NH. Remaining tooth structure associated with various preparation designs for the endodontically treated maxillary second premolar. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 2005;13:57-64.
22. Farah JW, Craig RG, Meroueh KA. Finite element analysis of a mandibular model. J Oral Rehabil 1988;15:615-624.
23. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed: Mosby; St. Louis, 2002.
24. Zarone F, Apicella D, Sorrentino R, Ferro V, Aversa R, Apicella A. Influence of tooth preparation design on the stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored by means of alumina porcelain veneers: A 3D-finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2005;21:1178-1188.
25. Burke FJ. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns constructed in a leucite-reinforced ceramic. Dent Mater 1999;15:359-362.
26. Christensen G. Posts and cores: State of the art. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:96.
27. Eakle WS, Maxwell EH, Braly BV. Fractures of posterior teeth in adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:215-218.
28. Milicich G, Rainey JT. Clinical presentations of stress distribution in teeth and the significance in operative dentistry. Prac Periodont Aesthet Dent 2000;12:695-700.
29. Arola D, Galles LA, Sarubin MF. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations. J Dent 2001;29:63-73.
30. Deligeorgi V. Aspects of management in the restoration of molar teeth (PhD thesis): University of Manchester; 2002.
31. Habekost L de V, Camacho GB, Pinto MB, Demarco W. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with partial ceramic restorations and submitted to two different loading stresses. Oper Dent 2006;31:204-211.
32. Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: Some clinical implications. Int Dent J 1991;41:25-32.
33. Lin CL, Chang CH, Wang CH, Ko CC, Lee HE. Numerical investigation of the factors affecting interfacial stresses in an MOD restored tooth by automeshed finite element method. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:517-525.
34. Khera SC, Goel VK, Chen RC, Gurusami SA. Parameters of MOD cavity preparations: A 3-D FEM study, Part II. Oper Dent 1991;16:42-54.