Citation patterns of online and print journals in the digital age

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 362-369

  De Groote, Sandra L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIGITAL COMPUTER; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; ONLINE SYSTEM; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZATION; SEARCH ENGINE; URBAN AREA;

FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; LIBRARY SURVEYS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 55849091373     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.96.4.012     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bane AF. Business Periodicals Ondisc: how full-text availability affects the library. Comput Libr. 1995 May;15(5):54-6.
2. Pessah R, Venturella K. Document delivery: St. John's University's experience with full-text services. Libr Software Rev. 1995 Winter;4(4):212-4.
3. Rogers SA. Electronic journal usage at Ohio State University. Coll Res Libr. 2001 Jan;62(1):25-34.
4. Morse DJ, Clintworth WA. Comparing patterns of print and electronic journal use in an academic health science library. Issues Sci Technol Libr [Internet]. 2000 Fall;(28) [cited Jan 2008]. 〈http://www.istl.org/00-fall/ refereed.html〉.
5. Montgomery CH, Sparks JL. The transition to an electronic journal collection: managing the organizational changes (at Drexel University). Ser Rev. 2000 Oct;26(3):4-18.
6. De Groote SL, Dorsch JL. Online journals: impact on print journal usage. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2001 Oct;89(4):372-8.
7. Rupp-Serrano K, Robbins S, Cain D. Canceling print serials in favor of electronic: criteria for decision-making. Lib Coll, Acquis & Tech Serv. 2002 Winter;26:369-78.
8. Spencer JS, Millson-Martual C. Serials cancellations in college and small university libraries: the national scene. Serials Librarian. 2006;49:135-55.
9. Boye P, King DW, Montgomery C. How electronic journals are changing patterns of use. Serials Librarian. 2004 Apr;46(1/2):121-41.
10. De Groote SL, Shultz M, Doranski M. Online journals' impact on the citation patterns of medical faculty. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Apr;93(2):223-8.
11. Weller AC. 2001. Editorial peer review: its strengths and weaknesses. Medford, NJ: Information Today; 2001.
12. Perkins E. Johns Hopkins' tragedy: could librarians have prevented a death? Inform Today [Internet]. 2001 Aug 7 [cited Dec 2007]. 〈http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=17534〉.
13. De Groote SL, Dorsch JL. Measuring use patterns of online journals and databases. J Med Libr Assoc. 2003 Apr;91(2):231-40.
14. Brennan MJ, Hurd JM, Blecic DD, Weller AC. A snapshot of early adopters of e-journals: challenges to the library. Coll Res Libr. 2002 Nov;63(6):515-26.
15. Blecic D. Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlations between three methods. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999 Jan;87(1):20-5.
16. De Groote SL, Appelt K. The accuracy and thoroughness of a federated search engine in the health sciences. Int Ref Serv Q. 2007;12(1/2):27-47.
17. Kaplan R, Steinburg M, Doucette J. Retention of retrospective print journals in the digital age: trends and analysis. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Oct;94(4):387-93.
18. Vaughan KTL. Changing use patterns of print journals in the digital age: impacts of electronic equivalents on print chemistry journal use. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2003;54(12):1149-52.