Canceling print serials in favor of electronic: Criteria for decision making

Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 369-378

  Rupp Serrano, Karen ^a   Robbins, Sarah ^a   Cain, Danielle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic libraries; Cancellation; Criteria; Electronic serials:Guidelines

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036902054     PISSN: 14649055     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00274-9     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Davis, T. L. (1997). The evolution of selection activities for electronic resources. Library Trends, 45 (3), 391-403.
2. Stewart, L. A. (2000). Choosing between print and electronic resources: the selection dilemma. The Reference Librarian, 71, 79-97.
3. Ashcroft, L., & Langdon, C. (1999). Electronic journals and university library collections. Collection Building, 18 (3), 105-113.
4. Stewart, L. A. (2000). Choosing between print and electronic resources: the selection dilemma. The Reference Librarian, 71, 79-97.
5. Lee, S. D. (2002). Electronic collection development: a practical guide. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
6. Davis, T. L. (1997). The evolution of selection activities for electronic resources. Library Trends, 45 (3), 391-403.
7. Walravens, H. (2001). The happiness we dream of: the future of serials-realism or utopia? The Serials Librarian, 41 (2), 149-155.
8. Gyeszly, S. D. (2001). Electronic or paper journals? Budgetary, collection development and user satisfaction questions. Collection Building, 20 (1), 5-10.
9. Montgomery, C. H. (2000). Measuring the Impact of an Electronic Journal Collection on Library Costs. D-Lib Magazine, 6 (10). Retrieved June 2, 2002 from OCLC FirstSearch database Library Literature on the World Wide Web: http://newfirstsearch.oclc.org.
10. Montgomery, C. H. (2000). Fast track transition to an electronic journal collection: a case study. New Library World, 101 (7), 294-303.