Extrinsic embryonic sensory stimulation alters multimodal behavior and cellular activation

Developmental Neurobiology

Volumn 68, Issue 13, 2008, Pages 1463-1473

  Markham, Rebecca G ^a,b   Shimizu, Toru ^c   Lickliter, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellular activation; Embryogenesis; Extrinsic stimulation; Midbrain; Multimodal behavior

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BRAIN REGION; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL COUNT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PERINATAL PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUAIL; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AFFERENT PATHWAYS; AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRAIN MAPPING; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; IMMEDIATE-EARLY PROTEINS; MATERNAL BEHAVIOR; PHOTIC STIMULATION; QUAIL; REACTION TIME; SENSORY RECEPTOR CELLS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 55249123848     PISSN: 00223034     EISSN: 10974695     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dneu.20667     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bateson PP, Seaburne-May G. 1973. Effects of prior exposure to light on chicks' behaviour in the imprinting situation. Anim Behav 21:720-725.
2. Bayle JD, Ramade F, Oliver J. 1974. Stereotaxic topography of the brain of the quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). J Physiol Paris 68:219-241.
3. Cotter JR. 1976. Visual and nonvisual units recorded from the optic tectum of Gallus domesticus. Brain Behav Evol 13:1-21.
4. Crowley JC, Katz LC. 2002. Ocular dominance development revisited. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:104-109.
5. de Villers-Sidani E, Chang EF, Bao S, Merzenich MM. 2007. Critical period window for spectral tuning defined in the primary auditory cortex (A1) in the rat. J Neurosci 27:180-189.
6. Diekamp B, Kalt T, Güntürkün O. 2002. Working memory neurons in pigeons. J Neurosci 22:RC210.
7. Freeman BM, Vince MA. 1974. Development of the Avian Embryo. London: Chapman and Hall.
8. Galileo DS. 2003. Spatiotemporal gradient of oligodendrocyte differentiation in chick optic tectum requires brain integrity and cell-cell interactions. Glia 41:25-37.
9. Hamburger V, Balaban M, Oppenheim R, Wenger E. 1965. Periodic motility of normal and spinal chick embryos between 8 and 17 days of incubation. J Exp Zool 159:1-13.
10. Hamburger V, Oppenheim R. 1967. Prehatching motility and hatching behavior in the chick. J Exp Zool 166:171-203.
11. Harding AJ, Halliday GM, Cullen K. 1994. Practical considerations for the use of the optical disector in estimating neuronal number. J Neurosci Methods 51:83-89.
12. Heaton MB. 1973. Early visual function in bobwhite and Japanese quail embryos as reflected by pupillary reflex. J Comp Physiol Psychol 84:134-139.
13. Hellmann B, Güntürkün O, Manns M. 2004. Tectal mosaic: Organization of the descending tectal projections in comparison to the ascending tectofugal pathway in the pigeon. J Comp Neurol 472:395-410.
14. Howe CL, Mayoral S, Rodriguez M. 2006. Activated microglia stimulate transcriptional changes in primary oligodendrocytes via IL-1β. Neurobiol Dis 23:731-739.
15. Hughes WF, McLoon SC. 1979. Ganglion cell death during normal retinal development in the chick: Comparisons with cell death induced by early target field destruction. Exp Neurol 66:587-601.
16. Hunt SP, Künzle H. 1976. Observations on the projections and intrinsic organization of the pigeon optic tectum: An autoradiographic study based on anterograde and retrograde, axonal and dendritic flow. J Comp Neurol 170:153-172.
17. Jackson PS, Bateson PP. 1974. Imprinting and exploration of slight novelty in chicks. Nature 251:609-610.
18. Jones TA, Jones SM, Paggett KC. 2006. Emergence of hearing in the chicken embryo. J Neurophysiol 96:128-141.
19. Knapska E, Kaczmarek L. 2004. A gene for neuronal plasticity in the mammalian brain: Zif268/Egr-1/NGFI-A/Krox-24/TIS8/ZENK? Prog Neurobiol 74:183-211.
20. Knudsen EI, Konishi M. 1978. Space and frequency are represented separately in auditory midbrain of the owl. J Neurophysiol 41:870-884.
21. Komissarova NV, Anokhin KV. 2008. Effects of an imprinting procedure on cell proliferation in the chick brain. Neurosci Behav Physiol 38:289-296.
22. Koshiba M, Nakamura S, Deng C, Rogers LJ. 2003. Light-dependent development of asymmetry in the ipsilateral and contralateral thalamofugal visual projections of the chick. Neurosci Lett 336:81-84.
23. Kroger S, Schwarz U. 1990. The avian tectobulbar tract: Development, explant culture, and effects of antibodies on the pattern of neurite outgrowth. J Neurosci 10:3118-3134.
24. Kuenzel WJ, Masson M. 1988. A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brain of the Chick (Gallus domesticus). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Levic S, Nie L, Tuteja D, Harvey M, Sokolowski BH, Yamoah EN. 2007. Development and regeneration of hair cells share common functional features. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19108-19113.
26. Lickliter R, Hellewell TB. 1992. Contextual determinants of auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos and hatchlings. Dev Psychobiol 25:17-31.
27. Lickliter R, Virkar P. 1989. Intersensory functioning in bobwhite quail chicks: Early sensory dominance. Dev Psychobiol 22:651-667.
28. Long KD, Salbaum JM. 1998. Evolutionary conservation of the immediate-early gene ZENK. Mol Biol Evol 15:284-292.
29. Luksch H, Cox K, Karten HJ. 1998. Bottlebrush dendritic endings and large dendritic fields: Motion-detecting neurons in the tectofugal pathway. J Comp Neurol 396:399-414.
30. Markham RG, Toth G, Lickliter R. 2006. Prenatally elevated physiological arousal interferes with perceptual learning in bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) embryos. Behav Neurosci 120:1315-1325.
31. McBride T, Lickliter R. 1994. Specific postnatal auditory stimulation interferes with species-typical visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Dev Psychobiol 27:169-183.
32. Mello CV, Ribeiro S. 1998. ZENK protein regulation by song in the brain of songbirds. J Comp Neurol 393:426-438.
33. Mey J, Thanos S. 2000. Development of the visual system of the chick. I. Cell differentiation and histogenesis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 32:343-379.
34. Nieder B, Wagner H, Luksch H. 2003. Development of output connections from the inferior colliculus to the optic tectum in barn owls. J Comp Neurol 464:511-524.
35. Saunders JC, Coles RB, Gates GR. 1973. The development of auditory evoked responses in the cochlea and cochlear nuclei of the chick. Brain Res 63:59-74.
36. Si F, Brodie H, Gillespie PG, Vazquez AE, Yamoah EN. 2003. Developmental assembly of transduction apparatus in chick basilar papilla. J Neurosci 23:10815-10826.
37. Siegel S, Castellan NJ. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill, pp 19-36.
38. Sleigh MJ, Lickliter R. 1996. Type and amount of prenatal stimulation alters perceptual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks. Infant Behav Dev 19.
39. Tellegen AJ, Karssen AM, Rietveld TM, Dubbeldam JL. 1998. A crossed projection from the optic tectum to craniocervical premotor areas in the brainstem reticular formation. An anterograde and retrograde tracing study in the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos L.). Eur J Morphol 36:227-243.
40. Terpstra NJ, Bolhuis JJ, Den Boer-Visser AM, Ten Cate C. 2005. Neuronal activation related to auditory perception in the brain of a non-songbird, the ring dove. J Comp Neurol 488:342-351.
41. Thode C, Bock J, Braun K, Darlison MG. 2005. The chicken immediate-early gene ZENK is expressed in the medio-rostral neostriatum/hyperstriatum ventrale, a brain region involved in acoustic imprinting, and is up-regulated after exposure to an auditory stimulus. Neuroscience 130:611-617.
42. Vince MA. 1964. Synchronization of hatching in American Bobwhite Quail (Colinus virginianus). Nature 203:1192-1193.
43. von Melchner L, Pallas SL, Sur M. 2000. Visual behaviour mediated by retinal projections directed to the auditory pathway. Nature 404:871-876.
44. West MJ, Gundersen HJ. 1990. Unbiased stereological estimation of the number of neurons in the human hippocampus. J Comp Neurol 296:1-22.
45. Whitney O, Johnson F. 2005. Motor-induced transcription but sensory-regulated translation of ZENK in socially interactive songbirds. J Neurobiol 65:251-259.
46. Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. 1963. Effects of visual deprivation on morphology and physiology of cells in the cat's lateral geniculate body. J Neurophysiol 26:978-993.
47. Williams CV, McLoon SC. 1991. Elimination of the transient ipsilateral retinotectal projection is not solely achieved by cell death in the developing chick. J Neurosci 11:445-453.
48. Wizenmann A, Thanos S. 1990. The developing chick isthmo-optic nucleus forms a transient efferent projection to the optic tectum. Neurosci Lett 113:241-246.
49. Wong WT, Sanes JR, Wong RO. 1998. Developmentally regulated spontaneous activity in the embryonic chick retina. J Neurosci 18:8839-8852.
50. Woolley SC, Doupe AJ. 2008. Social context-induced song variation affects female behavior and gene expression. PLoS Biol 6:e62.
51. Zhang Z, Galileo DS. 1998. Widespread programmed cell death in early developing chick optic tectum. Neuroreport 9:2797-2801.