Neuronal activation related to auditory perception in the brain of a non-songbird, the ring dove

Journal of Comparative Neurology

Volumn 488, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 342-351

  Terpstra, Nienke J ^a   Bolhuis, Johan J ^b   Den Boer Visser, Ardie M ^a   Cate, Carel Ten ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Avian; CMM CMHV; Immediate early genes; Learning; NCM; ZENK

Indexed keywords

UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZENK PROTEIN;

ADOLESCENT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CELL ACTIVATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOVE; FOREBRAIN; GENE EXPRESSION; HEARING; IMMEDIATE EARLY GENE; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STREPTOPELIA RISORIA; VOCALIZATION; ZENK GENE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CELL COUNT; COLUMBIDAE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; NEURONS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY;

EID: 21644452872     PISSN: 00219967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cne.20592     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bailey DJ, Wade J. 2003. Differential expression of the immediate early genes FOS and ZENK following auditory stimulation in the juvenile male and female zebra finch. Mol Brain Res 116:147-154.
2. Bailey DJ, Rosebush JC, Wade J. 2002. The hippocampus and caudomedial neostriatum show selective responsiveness to conspecific song in the female zebra finch. J Neurobiol 52:43-51.
3. Beckers GJL, Goossens BMA, ten Gate C. 2003. Perceptual salience of acoustic differences between conspecific and allospecific vocalizations in African collared-doves. Anim Behav 65:605-614.
4. Bolhuis JJ, Eda-Fujiwara H. 2003. Bird brains and songs: neural mechanisms of birdsong perception and memory. Anim Biol 53:129-145.
5. Bolhuis JJ, Zijlstra GGO, den Boer-Visser AM, van der Zee EA. 2000. Localized neuronal activation in the zebra finch brain is related to the strength of song learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:2282-2285.
6. Bolhuis JJ, Hetebrij E, den Boer-Visser AM, de Groot JH, Zijlstra GGO. 2001. Localized immediate early gene expression related to the strength of song learning in socially reared zebra finches. Eur J Neurosci 13:2165-2170.
7. Brenowitz EA. 1997. Comparative approaches to the avian song system. J Neurobiol 33:517-531.
8. Cardin JA, Schmidt MF. 2003. Song system auditory responses are stable and highly tuned during sedation, rapidly modulated and unselective during wakefulness, and suppressed by arousal. J Neurophysiol 90: 2884-2899.
9. Chew SJ, Mello C, Nottebohra F, Jarvis E, Vicario DS. 1995. Decrements in auditory responses to a repeated conspecific song are long-lasting and require two periods of protein-synthesis in the songbird forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:3406-3410.
10. Chew SJ, Vicario DS, Nottebohm F. 1996. A large-capacity memory system that recognizes the calls and songs of individual birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:1950-1955.
11. de Kort SR, ten Cate C. 2001. Response to interspecific vocalizations is affected by degree of phylogenetic relatedness in Streptopelia doves. Anim Behav 61:239-247.
12. den Boer-Visser A, Brittijn M, Dubbeldam J. 2004. A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the collared dove, Streptopelia decaocto. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Shaker.
13. Dubbeldam JL. 1998. Intratelencephalic sensorimotor circuits- in birds-what have feeding and vocalization in common? Neth J Zool 48:199-212.
14. Dubbeldam JL, van Ommen MH, den Boer-Visser AM. 1999. Immunohistochemical characterization of forebrain areas in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Eur J Morphol 37:134-138.
15. Duffy DL, Bentley GE, Ball GF. 1999. Does sex or photoperiodic condition influence ZENK induction in response to song in European starlings? Brain Res 844:78-82.
16. Eda-Fujiwara H, Satoh R, Bolhuis JJ, Kimura T. 2003. Neuronal activation in female budgerigars is localized and related to male song complexity. Eur J Neurosci 17:149-154.
17. Parries MA. 2001. This oscine song system considered in the context of the avian brain: lessons learned from comparative neurobiology. Brain Behav Evol 58:80-100.
18. Gahr M. 2000. Neural song control system of hummingbirds: comparison to swifts, vocal learning (songbirds) and nonlearning (suboscines) passerines, and vocal learning (budgerigars) and nonlearning (dove, owl, gull, quail, chicken) nonpasserines. J Comp Neurol 426:182-196.
19. Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG. 1998. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071-1075.
20. Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT. 2002. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569-1579.
21. Hernandez AM, MacDougall-Shackleton SA. 2004. Effects of early song experience on song preferences and song control and auditory brain regions in female house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus). J Neurobiol 59:247-258.
22. Hitchcock RR, Mirarchi RE, Lishak RS. 1989. Recognition of individual male parent vocalizations by nestling mourning doves. Anim Behav 37:517-520.
23. Jarvis ED, Mello CV. 2000. Molecular mapping of brain areas involved in parrot vocal communication. J Comp Neurol 419:1-31.
24. Jarvis ED, Nottebohm F. 1997. Motor-driven gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:4097-4102.
25. Jarvis ED, Mello CV, Nottebohm F. 1995. Associative learning and stimulus novelty influence the song-induced expression of an immediate-early gene in the canary forebrain. Learn Mem 2:62-80.
26. Jarvis ED, Ribeiro S, da Silva ML, Ventura D, Vielliard J, Mello CV. 2000. Behaviourally driven gene expression reveals song nuclei in humming-bird brain. Nature 406:628-632.
27. Jin H, Clayton DF. 1997. Localized changes in IEG regulation during sensory and motor learning in zebra finches. Neuron 19:1049-1059.
28. Kahn NW, St John J, Quinn TW. 1998. Chromosome-specific intron size differences in the avian CHD gene provide an efficient method for sex identification in birds. Auk 115:1074-1078.
29. Klein SL, Strausberg RL. 2002. Genetic and genomic tools for Xenopus research: the NIH Xenopus initiative. Dev Dyn 225:384-391.
30. Kruse AA, Stripling R, Clayton DF. 2004. Context-specic habituation of the zenk gene response to song in adult zebra finches. Neurobiol Learn Mem 82:99-108.
31. Lade BI, Thorpe WH. 1964. Dove songs as innately coded patterns of specific behaviour. Nature 202:366-368.
32. Long KD, Salbaum JM. 1998. Evolutionary conservation of the immediate-early gene ZENK. Mol Biol Evol 15:284-292.
33. Long KD, Kennedy G, Salbaum JM, Balaban E. 2002. Auditory stimulus-induced changes in immediate-early gene expression related to an inborn perceptual predisposition. J Comp Physiol A 188:25-38.
34. MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Hulse SH, Ball GF. 1998. Neural bases of song preferences in female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Neuroreport 9:3047-3052.
35. Mello CV, Clayton DF. 1994. Song-induced ZENK gene expression in auditory pathways of songbird brain and its relation to the song control system. J Neurosci 14:6652-6666.
36. Mello CV, Ribeiro S. 1998. ZENK protein regulation by song in the brain of songbirds. J Comp Neurol 393:426-438.
37. Mello CV, Vicario DS, Clayton DF. 1992. Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 6818-6822.
38. Nottebohm F, Nottebohm M. 1971. Vocalizations and breeding behaviour of surgically deafened ring doves (Streptopelia risoria). Anim Behav 19:313-327.
39. Park KHJ, Clayton DF. 2002. Influence of restraint and acute isolation on the selectivity of the adult zebra finch zenk gene response to acoustic stimuli. Behav Brain Res 136:185-191.
40. Phillmore LS, Bloomfield LL, Weisman RG. 2003. Effects of songs and calls on ZENK expression in the auditory telencephalon of field- and isolate-reared black capped chickadees. Behav Brain Res 147:125-134.
41. Reiner A, Perkel DJ, Bruce L, Butler AB, Csillag A, Kuenzel W, Medina L, Paxinos G, Shimizu T, Striedter GF, Wild M, Ball GF, Durand S, Güntürkün O, Lee DW, Mello CV, Powers A, White SA, Hough G, Kubikova L, Smulders TV, Wada K, Dugas-Ford J, Husband S, Yamamoto K, Yu J, Siang C, Jarvis ED. 2004. Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei. J Comp Neurol 473:377-414.
42. Schmidt MF, Konishi M. 1998. Gating of auditory responses in the vocal control system of awake songbirds. Nat Neurosci 1:513-518.
43. Secondi J, de Bakker MAG, ten Gate C. 2002. Female responses to male coos in the collared dove Streptopelia decaocto. Behaviour 139:1287-1302.
44. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45. Slabbekoorn H, de Kort S, ten Gate C. 1999. Comparative analysis of perch-coo vocalizations in Streptopelia doves. Auk 116:737-748.
46. Striedter GF. 1994. The vocal control pathways in budgerigars differ from those in songbirds. J Comp Neurol 343:35-56.
47. Stripling R, Volman S, Clayton D. 1997. Response modulation in the zebra finch neostriatum: relationship to nuclear gene regulation. J Neurosci 17:3883-3893.
48. Stripling R, Kruse AA, Clayton DF. 2001. Development of song responses in the zebra finch caudomedial neostriatum: role of genomic and electrophysiological activities. J Neurobiol 48:163-180.
49. ten Gate C, Slabbekoorn H, Ballintijn MR. 2002. Birdsong and male-male competition: causes and consequences of vocal variability in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). Adv Stud Behav 31:31-75.
50. Terpstra NJ, Bolhuis JJ, van der Burg JJM, den Boer-Visser AM. 2001. Song learning-related immediate early gene expression in the forebrain of zebra finch females. Behav Pharmacol 12:S101.
51. Terpstra NJ, Bolhuis JJ, den Boer-Visser AM. 2004. An analysis of the neural representation of bird song memory. J Neurosci 24:4971-4977.
52. Wada K, Sakaguchi H, Jarvis ED, Hagiwara M. 2004. Differential expression of glutamate receptors in avian neural pathways for learned vocalization. J Comp Neurol 476:44-64.