The CAT model: Extensions and moderators of dominance in technology acceptance

Psychology and Marketing

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 987-1005

  Nasco, Suzanne A ^a   Kulviwat, Songpol ^b   Kumar, Anand ^c   Bruner II, Gordon C ^a,d  

^a Illinois University   (United States)

^b HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^d SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55249113891     PISSN: 07426046     EISSN: 15206793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mar.20249     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., and Manchanda, R. V. (2005). The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 207-212.
3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Bailey, A. A. (2004). The interplay of social influence and nature of fulfillment: Effects on consumer attitudes. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 263-278.
5. Baker, J., Levy, M., & Grewal, D. (1992). An experimental approach to making retail store environmental decisions. Journal of Retailing, 68, 445-460.
6. Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2, 159-179.
7. Bearden, W., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 183-194.
8. Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. R. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11, 283-295.
9. Bruner, G. C., II, & Kumar, A. (2005). Applying T.A.M. to consumer usage of handheld Internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 58, 553-558.
10. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structure. In G. W. Bohmstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Childers, T. L., Carr, C., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77, 511-536.
13. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 318-341.
14. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1004.
15. Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 60-71.
16. Donovan, R., & Rossiter, J. (1982). Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 58, 34-57.
17. Fiore, A. M., Jin, H., & Kim, J. (2005). For fun and profit: Hedonic value from image interactivity and responses toward an online store. Psychology & Marketing, 22, 669-694.
18. Foxall, G. R., & Greenley, G. E. (2000). Predicting and explaining responses to consumer environments: An empirical test and theoretical extension of the behavioural perspective model. Service Industries Journal, 20, 39-63.
19. Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 41, 1827-1844.
20. Hartman, J. B., Shim, S., Barber, B., & O'Brien, M. (2006). Adolescents' utilitarian and hedonic web consumption behavior: Hierarchical influence of personal values and innovativeness. Psychology & Marketing, 23, 813-839.
21. Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information systems use. Management Science, 40, 440-465.
22. Hirschman, E., & Holbrook, M. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods, and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46, 92-101.
23. Holbrook, M., & Gardner, M. (1998). How motivation moderates the effects of emotions on the duration of consumption. Journal of Business Research, 42, 241-252.
24. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80: Interactive LISREL for MS Windows. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
25. Karimi, J., Somers, T. M., & Gupta, Y. P. (2004). Impact of environmental uncertainty and task characteristics on user satisfaction with data. Information Systems Research, 15, 175-193.
26. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-60.
27. Kempf, D. S. (1999). Attitude formation from product trial: Distinct roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products. Psychology & Marketing, 16, 35-50.
28. Kulviwat, S., Bruner, G. C., II, Kumar, A., Nasco, S. A., & Clark, T. (2007). Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance of the technology. Psychology & Marketing, 24, 1059-1084.
29. Lucas, H., & Spitler, V. K. (1999). Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences, 30, 291-311.
30. Machleit, K. A., & Eroglu, S. A. (2000). Describing and measuring emotional response to shopping experience. Journal of Business Research, 49, 101-111.
31. MacKenzie, S. B. (2003). The dangers of poor construct conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 323-326.
32. Mangleburg, T. F., Doney, P. M., & Bristol, T. (2004). Shopping with friends and teens' susceptibility to peer influence. Journal of Retailing, 80, 101-116.
33. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2, 173-192.
34. Mehrabian, A. (1995). Framework for a comprehensive description and measurement of emotional states. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 121, 341-361.
35. Mehrabian, A. (1996). Analysis of the big-five personality factors in terms of the PAD temperament model. Australian Journal of Psychology, 48, 86-94.
36. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38, 217-230.
38. Mowen, J. C., & Voss, K. E. (2008). On building better construct measures: Implications of a general hierarhcical model. Psychology & Marketing, 25, 485-505.
39. Nasco, S. A., Grandon, E., & Mykytyn, P. (2007). Predicting electronic commerce adoption in Chilean SMEs using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61, 697-705.
40. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41. Pedersen, P. E., & Nysveen, H. (2003). Using the theory of planned behavior to explain teenagers' adoption of text messaging service. Working Paper.
42. Raghunathan, R., & Corfman, K. (2006). Is happiness shared doubled and sadness shared halved? Social influence on enjoyment of hedonic experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 386-394.
43. Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 305-335.
44. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178.
45. Russell, J. A. (1991). In defense of a prototype approahc to emotion concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 37-47.
46. Schlosser, A. E., & Shavitt, S. (2002). Anticipating discussion about a product: Rehearsing what to say can affect your judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 101-115.
47. Sherman, E., Mathur, A., & Smith, R. B. (1997). Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: Mediating role of consumer emotions. Psychology & Marketing, 14, 361-378.
48. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 144-176.
49. Thorbjørnsen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Nysveen, H. (2007). This is who I am: Identity expressiveness and the theory of planned behavioar. Psychology & Marketing, 24, 763-785.
50. Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 28-45.
51. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.
52. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 115-139.
53. Webster, J., & Trevino, L. K. (1995). Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy-capturing studies. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1544-1573.
54. Yang, K. C. C. (2007). Exploring factors affecting consumer intention to use mobile advertising in Taiwan. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 20, 33-49.
55. Yani-de-Soriano, M. M., & Foxall, G. R. (2006). The emotional power of place: The fall and rise of dominance in retail research. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 13, 403-416.