Engineering cultures: Comparing student learning in online and classroom based implementations

International Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 955-964

  Parkhurst, Rosamond ^a   Moskal, Barbara M ^a   Lucena, Juan ^a   Downey, Gary Lee ^b   Bigley, Thomas ^b   Elber, Sharon ^b  

^a Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Global engineering; On line learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 55149104995     PISSN: 0949149X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. G. Gabriele, Advancing engineering education in a flattened world. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(3), 2005, pp. 285-286.
2. A. Z. Qamhiyah, Intel-nationalization of the undergraduate engineering program. Part 1: The need, International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 2005, pp. 158-165.
3. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, http://www.abet.org/international.shtml, (2008).
4. J. H. McMasters, Influencing student learning: an industry perspective, International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 2006, pp. 447-459.
5. G. L. Downey, J. Lucena, B. Moskal, R. Parkhurst, T. Bigley, C. Hays, B. Jesiek, L. Kelly, J. Miller and S. Ruff, The globally competent engineer: Working effectively with people who define problems differently, Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 2006, pp. 107-122.
6. B. Olds, B. Moskal and R. Miller, Assessment in engineering education: Evolution, approaches and future collaborations, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 2005, pp. 13-25.
7. C. Patterson, Student perceptions of internet-based learning tools in environmental engineering education, Journal of Engineering Education, 88(3), 1999, pp. 295-304.
8. J. Bourne, D. Harris and F. Mayadas, Online engineering education: Learning anywhere, anytime, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 2005, pp. 131-146.
9. S. Haag and J. Palais, Engineering online: Assessing innovative education, Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 2002, pp. 285-289.
10. J. Dutton, M. Dutton and J. Perry, Do online students perform as well as lecture students?. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 2001, pp. 131-136.
11. M. Collins and Z. Berge, Facilitating interaction in computer mediated online courses, FSUIAECT Distance Education Conference, Tallahassee, FL, Emoderators Document, http://www.emodera tors.com/moderators/flcc.html (June 1996).
12. J. Richardson, and K. Swan, Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 2003, pp. 68-88.
13. S. Johnson, S. Aragon, S. Najmuddin and N. Palma-Rivas, Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face environment, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 1(1). 2000, pp. 29-49.
14. B. S. Bloom Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain, David McKay. New York, (1956).
15. R. Christensen, Analysis of Variance, Design and Regression, Applied Statistical Methods, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, (1998).
16. R. Parkhurst, Engineering cultures: A comparative analysis of online and in-class implementations, Master thesis, Colorado School of Mines. (2007).