Priority determination in strategic energy policies in Turkey using analytic network process (ANP) with group decision making

International Journal of Energy Research

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1047-1057

  Daǧdeviren, Metin ^a   Eraslan, Ergün ^b  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Analytic network process (ANP); BOCR; Energy policies; Multi criteria decision analysis; Strategic planning

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PLANNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SENSOR NETWORKS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS (ANP); ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESSES; BOCR; ECONOMIC SITUATIONS; ENERGY CONSUMPTIONS; ENERGY DEMANDS; EVALUATING; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; HIGH RATES; MODEL BASED; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; SCIENTIFIC METHODS;

ENERGY POLICY;

EID: 55049096524     PISSN: 0363907X     EISSN: 1099114X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/er.1418     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Güngör Z, Bozkurt G. Economical comparison of imported energy sources in terms of long-term production planning. Energy 1999; 24:31-42.
2. Ediger V, Tatlidil H. Forecasting the primary energy demand in Turkey and analysis of cyclic patterns. Energy Conversion and Management 2002; 43:473-487.
3. Ceyla H, Oztürk HK. Estimating energy demand of Turkey based on economic indicators using genetic algorithm approach. Energy Conversion and Management 2004; 45:2525-2537.
4. Sozen A, Arcakloglu E, Ozkaymak M. Turkey's net energy consumption. Applied Energy 2005; 81:209-221.
5. Hamzacebi C. Forecasting of Turkey's net electricity energy consumption on sectoral bases. Energy Policy 2007; 35:2009-2016.
6. Kaygusuz K. Energy policy and climate change in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management 2003; 44:1671-1688.
7. Ulutas BH. Determination of the appropriate energy policy for Turkey. Energy 2005; 30:1146-1161.
8. Kilic FC, Kaya D. Energy production, consumption, policies, and recent developments in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2007; 11: 1312-1320.
9. Yilmaz AO, Uslu T. Energy policies of Turkey during the period 1923-2003. Energy Policy 2007; 35:258-264.
10. Ninth Development Planning 2007-2013. Available from: http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/program.
11. Saaty TL. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, 1996.
12. Liang C, Li Q. Enterprise information system project selection with regard to BOCR. International Journal of Project Management 2007; DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.11.001.
13. Saaty TL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1980.
14. Dagdeviren M, Eren T. Analytic hierarchy process and use of 0-1 goal programming methods in selecting supplier firm. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 2001; 16:41-52.
15. Bozdag CE, Kahraman C, Ruan D. Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry 2003; 5:13-29.
16. Buyukozkan G, Ertay T, Kahraman C, Ruan D. Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2004; 19:443-461.
17. Xiaohua W, Zhenmin F. Sustainable development of rural energy and its appraising system in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2002; 6:395-404.
18. Yedla S, Shresta RM. Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi. Transportation Research, Part A 2003; 37:717-729.
19. Aras H, Erdogmus S, Koc E. Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process. Renewable Energy 2004; 29:1383-1392.
20. Kablan MM. Decision support for energy conversation promotion: an analytic hierarchy process approach. Energy Policy 2004; 32:1151-1158.
21. Jaber JO, Jaber QM, Sawalha SA, Mohsen MS. Evaluation of conventional and renewable energy sources for space heating in the household sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2008; 12:278-289.
22. Suresh NC, Kaparthi S. Flexible automation investments: a synthesis of two multi-objective modeling approaches. Computers and Industrial Engineering 1992; 22:257-272.
23. Tolga E, Demircan ML, Kahraman C. Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics 2005; 97:89-117.
24. Badri MA. Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem. International Journal of Production Economics 1999; 62:237-248.
25. Kim PP, Lee KJ, Lee BW. Selection of an optimal nuclear fuel cycle scenario by goal programming and the analytic hierarchy process. Annals of Nuclear Energy 1999; 26:449-460.
26. Kuo RJ, Chi SC, Kao SS. A decision support system for selection convenience store location through integration of fuzzy AHP and artificial neural network. Computers in Industry 2002; 47:199-214.
27. Alphonce CB. Application of the analytic hierarchy process in agriculture in developing countries. Agricultural Systems 1997; 53:97-112.
28. Erdogmus S, Aras H, Koc E. Evaluation of alternative fuels for residential heating in Turkey using analytic network process with group decision making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2006; 10:269-279.
29. Saaty TL, Takizawa M. Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. European Journal of Operational Research 1986; 26:229-237.
30. Yüksel I, Daǧdeviren M. Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis - a case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences 2007; 177:3364-3382.
31. Meade LM, Sarkis J. Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: an analytical network approach. International Journal of Production Research 1999; 37:241-261.
32. Chung SH, Lee AHL, Pearn WL. Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. International Journal of Production Economics 2005; 96:15-36.
33. Gencer C, Gurpinar D. Analytic network process in supplier selection: a case study in an electronic firm. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2007; 31:2475-2486.
34. Meade LM, Sarkis J. Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process. Transportation Research, Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 1998; 34:201-215.
35. Lee JW, Kim SH. An integrated approach for independent information system project selection. International Journal of Project Management 2001; 19:111-118.
36. Lee JW, Kim SH. Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers and Operations Research 2000; 27:367-382.
37. Karsak EE, Sozer S, Alptekin SE. Production planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytical network process and goal programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2002; 44:171-190.
38. Partovi FY, Corredoira RA. Quality function deployment for the good of soccer. European Journal of Operational Research 2002; 137:642-656.
39. Meade LM, Presley A. R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2002; 49:59-66.
40. Sarkis J. A model for strategic supplier selection. Journal of Supply Chain Management 2002; 38:18-28.
41. Daǧdeviren M, Yüksel I, Kurt M. A fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) model to identify faulty behaviors risk (FBR) in work Systems. Safety Sciences 2007; DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.02.002.
42. Chen Z, Clements-Croome D, Hong J, Li H, Xu Q. A multicriteria lifespan energy efficiency approach to intelligent building assessment. Energy and Buildings 2006; 38:393-409.
43. Köne AÇ, Büke T. An analytic network process (ANP) evaluation of alternative fuels for electricity generation in Turkey. Energy Policy 2007; 35:5220-5228.
44. Demirtaş EA, Üstün Ö. An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation. International Journal of Management Science 2008; 36:76-90.
45. Ozdemir MS. Validity and inconsistency in the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2005; 161:707-720.
46. Cheng CH. Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research 1997; 96:343-350.
47. Saaty TL, Ozdemir M. Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Computer Modelling 2003; 37:1063-1075.
48. Saaty TL. Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network process. European Journal of Operational Research 2006; 168:557-570.
49. Bilsel RU, Büyüközkan G, Ruan D. A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital web sites. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2006; 21:1181-1197.