Recommendations on the use of Bayesian optimal designs for choice experiments

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 737-744

  Kessels, Roselinde ^a   Jones, Bradley ^b   Goos, Peter ^a   Vandebroek, Martina ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b SAS INSTITUTE INC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bayesian optimal designs; Choice experiments; Prior parameter distribution; Utility neutral optimal designs

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; EXPERIMENTS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; SENSOR NETWORKS; STATISTICS;

BAYESIAN; BAYESIAN OPTIMAL DESIGNS; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; LINEAR DESIGNS; OPTIMAL DESIGNS; PARAMETER DISTRIBUTIONS; PRACTICAL; PRIOR PARAMETER DISTRIBUTION; UTILITY-NEUTRAL OPTIMAL DESIGNS;

DESIGN;

EID: 54949130953     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.953     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics, Zarcmbka P (ed.). Academic Press: New York, 1974; 105-142.
2. Sándor Z, Wedel M. Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers' prior beliefs. Journal of Marketing Research 2001; 38:430-444.
3. Huber J, Zwerina K. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research 1996; 33:307-317.
4. Sándor Z, Wedel M. Heterogeneous conjoint choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research 2005; 42:210-218.
5. Kessels R, Goos P, Vandebroek M. A comparison of criteria to design efficient choice experiments. Journal of Marketing Research 2006; 43:409-419.
6. Kessels R, Jones B, Goos P, Vandebroek M. An efficient algorithm for constructing Bayesian optimal choice designs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2008; to appear.
7. k choice experiments. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 2003; 32:2185-2206.
8. Burgess L, Street DJ. Optimal designs for choice experiments with asymmetric attributes. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2005; 134:288-301.
9. Grasshoff U, Grossmann H, Holling H, Schwabe R. Optimal paired comparison designs for first-order interactions. Statistics 2003; 37:373-386.
10. Grasshoff U, Grossmann H, Holling H, Schwabe R. Optimal designs for main effects in linear paired comparison models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2004; 126:361-376.
11. Grossmann H, Holling H, Schwabe R. Advances in optimum experimental design for conjoint analysis and discrete choice models. Advances in Econometrics 16: Econometric Models in Marketing, Franses PH, Montgomery AL (eds.). JAI: Amsterdam, 2002; 93-117.
12. Grossmann H, Holling H, Grasshoff U, Schwabe R. Optimal designs for asymmetric linear paired comparisons with a profile strength constraint. Metrika 2006; 64:109-119.
13. Kuhfeld WF, Tobias RD. Large factorial designs for product engineering and marketing research applications. Technometrics 2005; 47:132-141.
14. k paired comparison experiments. Communications in Statistics- Theory and Methods 2001; 30:2149-2171.
15. Street DJ, Burgess L. Optimal and near-optimal pairs for the estimation of effects in 2-lcvel choice experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2004; 118:185-199.
16. Street DJ, Burgess L, Louviere JJ. Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2005; 22:459-470.