An efficient soft tissue characterization algorithm from in vivo indentation experiments for medical simulation

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 277-285

  Kim, Jung ^a   Ahn, Bummo ^a   De, Suvranu ^b   Srinivasan, Mandayam A ^c  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inverse FE model parameter estimation; Medical simulation; Soft tissue modelling

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INVERSE PROBLEMS; SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; TISSUE;

ABDOMINAL ORGANS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING (FEM); IN-VIVO; INVERSE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL PARAMETER ESTIMATION; INVERSE FINITE ELEMENTS; MEDICAL SIMULATIONS; MODEL PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SOFT TISSUE; SOFT TISSUE CHARACTERIZATIONS; SOFT TISSUE MODELING;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FORCE TRANSDUCER; IN VIVO STUDY; KIDNEY PARENCHYMA; LIVER; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL MODEL; ROBOTICS; SOFT TISSUE; SWINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 54949101979     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.209     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Basdogan C, Ho CH, Srinivasan MA. Virtual environments for medical training: graphical and haptic simulation of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. IEEE-ASME Trans Mechatron 2001; 6: 269-285.
2. Satava R, Jones S. Virtual environments for medical training and education. Teleoperators Virtual Environ 1997; 6: 139-146.
3. Tendick F, Downes M, Goktekin T, et al. A virtual environment testbed for training laparoscopic surgical skills. Teleoperators Virtual Environ 2000; 9: 236-255.
4. Bro-Nielsen M. Finite element modeling in surgery simulation. Proc IEEE 1998; 86: 490-503.
5. Cotin S, Delingette H, Ayache N. Real time elastic deformations of soft tissues for surgery simulation. IEEE Trans Visualiz Comput Graphics 1999; 5: 62-73.
6. James D, Pai DK. ArtDefo, accurate real time deformable objects. Proceedings of Association for Computing Machinery's Special Interest Group on Graphics and Interactive Techniques (ACM SIGGRAPH), Los Angels, CA, USA, 1999; 65-72.
7. Fung YC. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1993.
8. Yamada H, Evans FG. Strength of Biological Materials. Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, 1970.
9. Brouwer I, Ustin J, Bentley L, et al. Measuring in vivo animal soft tissue properties for haptic modeling in surgical simulation. Proceedings of the Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (MMVR) Conference, Newport Beach, CA, USA, 2001; 69-74.
10. Hu T, Desai JP, Lau ACW. Direct and inverse problem models for large soft-tissue deformation: application to haptic feedback in surgical simulation. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR '05), Seattle, WA, USA, 2005.
11. Ottensmeyer MP, Salisbury JK. In vivo data acquisition instrument for solid organ mechanical property measurement. Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.
12. Tay BK, De S, Stylopoulos N, et al. In vivo force response of intra-abdominal soft tissue for the simulation of laparoscopic procedures. Proceedings of the Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (MMVR) Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2002.
13. Farshad M, Barbezat M, Flueler P, et al. Material characterization of the pig kidney in relation with the biomechanical analysis of dental trauma. J Biomech 1999; 32: 411-425.
14. Davis PJ, Carter FJ, Loxburgh DG, et al. Mathematical modelling for keyhole surgery simulation: spleen capsule as an elastic membrane. J Theoret Med 1999; 1: 247-262.
15. Miller K. Constituive modelling of abdominal organs. J Biomech 1999; 33: 367-373.
16. Miller K, Chinzei K, Orssengo G, et al. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in vivo: experiment and computer simulation. J Biomech 2000; 33: 1369-1376.
17. Chanthasopeephan T, Desai JP, Lau ACW. Modeling soft-tissue deformation prior to cutting for surgical simulation: finite element analysis and study of cutting parameters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007; 54: 349-359.
18. Kauer M, Vuskovic V, Dual J, et al. Inverse finite element characterization of soft tissue. Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.
19. Tay BK, Kim J, Srinivasan MA. In vivo mechanical behavior of intra-abdominal organs. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006; 53: 2129-2138.
20. Zheng YP, Mark AFT. Extraction of quasi-linear viscoelastic parameters for lower limb soft tissues from manual indentation experiments. J Biomech Eng 1999; 121: 330-339.
21. Johnson GA, Livesay GA, Woo SLY, et al. A single integral finite strain viscoelastic model of ligaments and tendons. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 1996; 118: 221-226.
22. Carew EO, Talman EA, Boughner DR, et al. Quasi-linear viscoelastic theory applied to internal shearing of porcine aortic valve leaflets. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 1999; 121: 386-392.
23. Boyce MC, Arruda EM. Constitutive models of rubber elasticity: a review. Rubber Chem Technol 2000; 73: 504-523.
24. Cowin SC, Doty SB. Tissue Mechanics. Springer: New York, 2007.
25. Bathe KJ. Finite Element Procedures. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.
26. Richards M, Wineman AS, Alsberg E, et al. Viscoelastic characterization of mesenchymal gap tissue and consequences for tension accumulation during distraction. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 1999; 121: 116-123.
27. Pipkin AC. Lectures on Viscoelasticity Theory, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1986.
28. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, et al. Numerical Recipes in C + +: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1992.
29. Moulton MJ, Creswell LL, Actis RL, et al. An inverse approach to determining myocardial material properties. J Biomech 1995; 28: 935-948.
30. Seshaiyer P, Humphrey JD. A sub-domain inverse finite element characterization of hyperelastic membranes including soft tissues. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 2003; 125: 363-371.
31. Carter FJ, Frank TG, Davies PJ, et al. Measurements and modeling of the compliance of human and porcine organs. Med Image Anal 2001; 5: 231-236.
32. Lim YJ, De S. Physically realistic virtual surgery: modeling nonlinear tissue response using a point-associated finite field (PAFF) approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2007; 196(31-32): 3011-3024.
33. Kerdok AE, Cotin SM, Ottensmeyer MP, et al. Truth cube: establishing physical standards for real time soft tissue simulation. International Workshop on Deformable Modeling and Soft Tissue Simulation, Bonn, Germany, 2001.