Contextual effects on decision templates for parafoveal orientation identification

Vision Research

Volumn 48, Issue 27, 2008, Pages 2689-2695

  Mareschal, Isabelle ^a   Morgan, Michael J ^a   Solomon, Joshua A ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classification images; Crowding; Orientation discrimination

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA FOVEA; RETINA IMAGE; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 54949083806     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.08.020     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abbey C.K., and Eckstein M.P. Classification image analysis: estimation and statistical inference for two-alternative forced-choice experiments. J. Vision 2 (2002) 66-78
2. Abbey C.K., Eckstein M.P., and Bochud F.O. Estimation of human-observer templates in two-alternative forced-choice experiments. Proc SPIE 2662 (1999) 284-295
3. Ahumada A.J. Perceptual classification images from vernier acuity masked by noise. Perception 25 (1996)
4. Ahumada A.J. Classification image weights and internal noise level estimation. J. Vision 2 (2002) 121-131
5. Bouma H. Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature 116 (1970) 177-178
6. Bouma H. Visual interference in parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research 13 (1973) 767-782
7. Cannon M.W., and Fullenkamp S.C. Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations. Vision Research 31 (1991) 1985-1998
8. Chung S.T., Levi D.M., and Legge G.E. Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding. Vision Research 41 (2001) 1833-1850
9. Dakin S.C., and Bex P.J. Natural image statistics mediate brightness filling in. Proceedings of Royal Society 270 (2003) 2341-2348
10. DeAngelis G.C., Ohzawa I., and Freeman R.D. Journal of Neurophysiology 69 (1993) 1118-1135
11. Emerson R.C., Bergen J.R., and Adelson E.H. Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex. Vision Research 32 (1992) 203-218
12. Felisberti F.M., Solomon J.A., and Morgan M.J. The role of target salience in crowding. Perception 34 (2005) 823-833
13. Feng C., Jiang Y., and He S. Horizontal and vertical asymmetry in visual spatial crowding effects. Journal of Vision 7 2 (2007) 1-10 13
14. Field D.J., Hayes A., and Hess R.F. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local association field. Vision Research 33 (1993) 173-193
15. Gheri C., Morgan M.J., and Solomon J.A. The relationship between search efficiency and crowding. Perception 36 (2007) 1779-1787
16. Gold J.M., Murray R.F., Bennett P.J., and Sekuler A.B. Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours. Current Biology 10 (2000) 663-666
17. He S., Cavanaugh P., and Intriligator J. Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature 383 (1996) 334-337
18. Kaernbach C. Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Perception & Psychophysics 49 (1991) 227-229
19. Kooi F.L., Toet A., Tripathy S.P., and Levi D.M. The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision 8 (1994) 255-279
20. Levi D.M., and Klein S.A. Classification images for detection and position discrimination in the fovea and parafovea. Journal of Vision 2 (2002) 46-65
21. Levi D.M., Klein S.A., and Hariharan S. Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in foveal vision: Foveal crowding is simple contrast masking. Journal of Vision 2 (2002) 140-166
22. Levi D.M., Klein S.A., and Hariharan S. Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: Peripheral crowding is neither size invariant or simple contrast masking. Journal of Vision 2 (2002) 167-177
23. Livne T., and Sagi D. Configuration influence on crowding. Journal of Vision 7 2 (2007) 1-12 4
24. Loomis J.K. Lateral masking in foveal and eccentric vision. Vision Research 18 (1978) 335-338
25. Losada M.A., and Mullen K.T. Colo rand luminance spatial tuning estimated by noise masking in the absence of off-frequency looking. Journal of the Optical Society of America 12 (1995) 250-260
26. Mareschal I., Dakin S.C., and Bex P.J. Dynamic properties of orientation discrimination assessed using classification images. PNAS 103 (2006) 5131-5136
27. Meese T., and Hess R.F. Anisotropy for spatial summation of elongated patches of grating: a tale of two tails. Vision Research 47 (2007) 1880-1892
28. Murray R.F., Bennet P.J., and Sekuler A.B. Optimal methods for calculating classification images: weighted sums. Journal of Vision 2 (2002) 79-104
29. Nandy A.S., and Tjan B.S. The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images. Journal of Vision 7 (2007) 1-26
30. Neri P., and Heeger D.J. Spatiotemporal mechanisms for detecting and identifying image features in human vision. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2002) 812-816
31. Ohzawa I., DeAngelis G.C., and Freeman R.D. Enccoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 77 (1997) 2879-2909
32. Parkes L., Lund J., Angelucci A., Solomon J.A., and Morgan M. Compulsory averaging or crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 739-744
33. Pelli D.G., Palomares M., and Majaj N.J. Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 1136-1169
34. Petrov Y., Popple A.V., and Mc Kee S. Crowding and surround suppression: not to be confused. Journal of Vision 7 (2007) 1-9
35. Poder E. Crowding, feature integration and two kinds of attention. Journal of Vision 6 (2006) 163-169
36. Polat U., and Norcia A.M. Elongated physiological summation pools in the human visual cortex. Vision Research 38 (1998) 3735-3741
37. Polat U., and Tyler C.W. What pattern the eye sees best. Vision Research 39 (1999) 887-895
38. Regan D., and Beverley K.I. Postadaptation orientation discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America 2 (1985) 147-155
39. Ringach D.L., Hawken M.J., and Shapley R. Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex. Nature 387 (1997) 281-284
40. Solomon J.A. Channel selection with non-white-noise masks. Journal of the Optical Society of America 17 (2000) 986-993
41. Solomon J.A., and Morgan M.J. Facilitation from collinear flanks is canceled by non-collinear flanks. Vision Research 40 (2000) 279-286
42. Solomon J.A. Noise reveals visual mechanisms of detection and discrimination. Journal of Vision 2 (2002) 105-120
43. Strasburger H. Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. Journal of Vision 5 (2005) 1024-1037
44. Toet A., and Levi D.M. The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research 32 (1992) 1349-1357
45. Tripathy S.P., and Cavanaugh P. The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size. Vision Research 42 (2002) 2357-2369
46. Wetherill G.B., and Levitt H. Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 18 (1965) 1-10
47. Wilkinson F., Wilson H.R., and Ellember D. Lateral interactions in peripherally viewed texture arrays. Journal of the Optical Society of America 14 (1997) 2057-2068
48. Williams C.B., and Hess R.F. Relationship between facilitation at threshold and suprathreshold contour integration. Journal of the Optical Society of America 15 (1998) 2046-2051
49. Wilson H.R., McFarlane D.K., and Phillips G.C. Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking. Vision Research 23 (1983) 873-882