Development and empirical validation of symmetric component measures of multidimensional constructs: customer and competitor orientation

Psychological Reports

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 199-213

  Sørensen, Hans Eibe ^a   Slater, Stanley F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 54849439751     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PR0.103.1.199-213     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ANDERSON, J. C., & GERBING, D. W. (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
2. BAGOZZI, R. P. (1980) Causal models in marketing. New York: Wiley.
3. BAGOZZI, R. P., & YI, Y. (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
4. BROWNE, M. W., & CUDECK, R. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Pp. 136-162.
5. CAMPBELL, D. T., & FISKE, D. W. (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
6. CARMINES, E. G., & ZELLER, R. A. (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. CHURCHILL, G. A. (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.
8. DAY, G. S. (1994) The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58, 37-52.
9. DAY, G. S., & WENSLEY, R. (1983) Marketing theory with a strategic orientation. Journal of Marketing, 47, 79-89.
10. DAY, G. S., & WENSLEY, R. (1988) Assessing advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52, 1-20.
11. DESHPANDE, R., & FARLEY, J. U. (1998) Measuring market orientation: generalization and synthesis. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 2, 213-232.
12. DESHPANDE, R., FARLEY, J. U., & WEBSTER, P. (1993) Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57, 23-38.
13. DIAMANTOPOULOS, A. (1999) Export performance measurement: reflective versus formative indicators. International Marketing Review, 16, 444-457.
14. DOUGLAS, S., & CRAIG, C. S. (1983) International marketing research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. EDWARDS, J. R. (2001) Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: an integrative framework. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 144-192.
16. FORNELL, C., & LARCKER, D. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
17. GATIGNON, H., & XUEREB, J-M. (1997) Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 77-90.
18. GERBING, D. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1988) An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186-192.
19. HAIR, J. F., BLACK, W. C., BABIN, B. J., ANDERSON, R. E., & TATHAM, R. L. (2006) Multivariate data analysis. (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. HELM, A. E., HUNT, D., & HOUSTON, M. B. (2003) Citation frequency of research published in the top three marketing journals: ranking the impact of articles, scholars, and institutions. In R. B. Money & R. L. Rose (Eds.), AMA Summer Educators' Conference Proceedings. Vol. 14. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association. Pp. 198-208.
21. HINKIN, T. R. (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104-121.
22. HUNT, S. D., & MORGAN, R. M. (1995) The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59, 1-15.
23. IM, S., & WORKMAN, J. P. (2004) Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68, 114-132.
24. JACOBY, J. (1978) Consumer research: a state of the art review. Journal of Marketing, 42, 87-96.
25. JAWORSKI, B. J., & KOHLI, A. K. (1993) Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53-70.
26. JAWORSKI, B. J., & KOHLI, A. K. (1996) Market orientation: review, refinement, and roadmap. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 1, 119-135.
27. KEITH, T. Z. (2006) Multiple regression and beyond. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
28. KIRCA, A. H., JAYACHANDRAN, S., & BEARDEN, W. O. (2005) Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 24-41.
29. KOHLI, A. K., & JAWORSKI, B. J. (1990) Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54, 1-18.
30. KOHLI, A. K., JAWORSKI, B. J., & KUMAR, A. (1993) MARKOR: a measurement of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 467-477.
31. MATSUNO, K., & MENTZER, J. T. (2000) The effects of strategy type on the market orientation-performance relationship. Journal of Marketing, 64, 1-16.
32. MATSUNO, K., MENTZER, J. T., & RENTZ, J. O. (2005) A conceptual and empirical comparison of three market orientation scales. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1-8.
33. NARVER, J. C., & SLATER, S. F. (1990) The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54, 20-35.
34. NARVER, J. C., SLATER, S. F., & MACLACHLAN, D. L. (2004) Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 334-347.
35. NETEMEYER, R. (2001) Can a reliability coefficient be too high? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10, 56-58.
36. NUNNALLY, J. C., & BERNSTEIN, I. H. (1994) Psychometric theory. (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
37. OCZKOWSKI, E., & FARRELL, M. A. (1998) Discriminating between measurement scales using non-nested tests and two-stage least squares estimators: the case of market orientation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15, 349-366.
38. OLSON, E. M., SLATER, S. E, & HULT, G. T. M. (2005) The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behavior. Journal of Marketing, 69, 49-65.
39. PETER, J. P. (1981) Construct validity: a review of basic issues and marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 133-145.
40. SCHWAB, D. P. (1980) Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Pp. 2-43.
41. STEENKAMP, J-B. E. M., & IVAN TRIJP, H. C. M. (1991) The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8, 283-299.
42. ZELLER, R. A., & CARMINES, E. G. (1979) Measurement in the social sciences: the link between theory and data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press.
43. ZHOU, K. Z., YIM, C. K., & TSE, D. K. (2005) The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69, 42-60.