High School Students Learning Science in University Research Laboratories

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1115-1133

  Bleicher, Robert E ^a,b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008677984     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199612)33:10<1115::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-V     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bleicher, R.E. (1994). High school students presenting science: An interactional sociolinguistic analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 697-719.
2. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Wittrock, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
4. Goodfield, J. (1981). An imagined world. New York: Harper & Row.
5. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly hills, CA; Sage.
6. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. New York: Pergamon.
7. Koballa, T., Butts, D., & Riley, J. (1995, April). An evaluation model with participant constructed components. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
8. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (2nd éd.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Lave, J. (1977). Tailor-made experiments and evaluating the intellectual consequences of apprenticeship training. Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development, 1, 1-3.
10. Lave, J. (1995, April). What's the situation of learning (After two decades of practice)? Invited address of the 1994 recipient of the Scribner award. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
11. Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12. Roth, W., & Roychoundhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 127-152.
13. Schliemann, A., & Acioly, N. (1989). Mathematical knowledge developed as work: The contribution of practice versus the contribution of schooling. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 185-221.
14. Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9-40). Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press.
15. Shymansky, J., & Kyle, W. (1992). Establishing a research agenda: Critical issues of science curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 749-778.
16. Sirotnik, K., & Goodlad, J. (Eds.). (1988). School-university partnerships in action: concepts, cases, and concerns. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
18. Tamir, P., & Shulman, L. (1973). Research on teaching in the natural sciences. In R. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (chap. 34). Chicago: Rand McNally.
19. Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The very idea. New York: Tavistock.