Race and Jury Selection: Psychological Perspectives on the Peremptory Challenge Debate

American Psychologist

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 527-539

  Sommers, Samuel R ^a   Norton, Michael I ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

bias reduction; influence of race; jury selection; peremptory challenge; stereotyping

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; ETHNIC GROUP; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ATTITUDE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ETHNIC GROUPS; HUMANS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 54549105595     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.527     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. Alschuler A.W. The Supreme Court and the jury: Voir dire, peremptory challenges, and the review of jury verdicts. University of Chicago Law Review 56 (1989) 153-233
2. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
3. Babcock B.A. Voir dire: Preserving "its wonderful power.". Stanford Law Review 27 (1975) 545-565
4. Babcock B.A. A place in the palladium: Women's rights and jury service. University of Cincinnati Law Review 61 (1993) 1139-1180
5. Baldus D.C., Woodworth G.G., Zuckerman D., Weiner N.A., and Broffitt B. The use of peremptory challenges in capital murder trials: A legal and empirical analysis. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 3 (2001) 3-169
6. Banaji M.R., Nosek B.A., and Greenwald A.G. No place for nostalgia in science: A response to Arkes and Tetlock. Psychological Inquiry 15 (2004) 279-310
7. Barden J., Maddux W.W., Petty R.E., and Brewer M.B. Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 5-22
8. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).
9. Bertrand M., and Mullainathan S. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review 94 (2004) 991-1013
10. Blair I. Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. In: Moskowitz G.B. (Ed). Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (2001), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 359-374
11. Brewer M.B., and Brown R. Intergroup relations. In: Gilbert D.T., Fiske S.T., and Lindzey G. (Eds). The handbook of social psychology. 4th ed. (1998), McGraw-Hill, New York 554-594
12. Brewer T.W. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: The effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination. Law and Human Behavior 28 (2004) 529-545
13. Broderick R.J. Why the peremptory challenge should be abolished. Temple Law Review 65 (1992) 369-423
14. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
15. Bureau of Justice Statistics. State court organization (2004). http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/sco04.pdf Retrieved December 12, 2007, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/sco04.pdf
16. Cohn A., and Sherwood D. The rise and fall of affirmative action in jury selection. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 32 (1999) 323-333
17. Council for Court Excellence, District of Columbia Jury Project. Juries for the year 2000 and beyond: Proposals to improve the jury systems in Washington, D.C (1998), Author, Washington, DC
18. Cowan C.L., Thompson W.C., and Ellsworth P.C. The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation. Law and Human Behavior 8 (1984) 53-79
19. Crandall C.S., Eshelman A., and O'Brien L. Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (2002) 359-378
20. Crosby F., Bromley S., and Saxe L. Recent unobtrusive studies of black and white discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin 87 (1980) 546-563
21. Darley J.M., and Gross P.H. A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (1983) 20-33
22. Davis J.H., Kerr N.L., Atkin R.S., Holt R., and Meek D. The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (1975) 1-14
23. Devine P.G. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1989) 5-18
24. Diamond S.S. Instructing on death: Psychology, juries, and judges. American Psychologist 48 (1993) 423-434
25. Diamond S.S., Ellis L., and Schmidt E. Realistic responses to the limitations of Batson v. Kentucky. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 7 (1997) 77-95
26. Dovidio J.F., and Gaertner S.L. On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The causes, consequences, and challenges of aversive racism. In: Eberhardt J.L., and Fiske S.T. (Eds). Confronting racism: The problem and the response (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 3-32
27. Dunton B.C., and Fazio R.H. An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23 (1997) 316-326
28. Eberhardt J.L. Imaging race. American Psychologist 60 (2005) 181-190
29. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co., 500 U.S. 614 (1991).
30. Ellis L., and Diamond S.S. Race, diversity, and jury composition: Battering and bolstering legitimacy. Chicago-Kent Law Review 78 (2003) 1033-1060
31. El-Mallawany D.K. Johnson v. California and the initial assessment of Batson claims. Fordham Law Review 74 (2006) 3333-3363
32. Fazio R.H., Jackson J.R., Dunton B.C., and Williams C.J. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (1995) 1013-1027
33. Finkelstein M.O., and Levin B. Clear choices and guesswork in peremptory challenges in federal criminal trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 160 (1997) 275-288
34. Fiske S.T. Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In: Gilbert D.T., Fiske S.T., and Lindzey G. (Eds). The handbook of social psychology. 4th ed. (1998), McGraw-Hill, New York 357-414
35. Fiske S.T., Cuddy A.J.C., Glick P., and Xu J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (2002) 878-902
36. Fiske S.T., and Neuberg S.L. A continuum model of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology 3 (1990), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1-74
37. Fukurai H., and Davies D. Affirmative action in jury selection: Racially representative juries, racial quotas, and affirmative juries of the Hennepin model and the Jury de Medietate Linguae. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 4 (1997) 645-681
38. Fulero S.M., and Penrod S.D. The myths and realities of attorney jury selection folklore and scientific jury selection: What works?. Ohio Northern University Law Review 17 (1990) 229-253
39. Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U.S. 42 (1992).
40. Goldin C., and Rouse C. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of "blind" auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review 90 (2000) 715-741
41. Greenwald A.G., and Banaji M.R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 4-27
42. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., and Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 197-216
43. Haney C. On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of the death qualification process. Law and Human Behavior 8 (1984) 121-132
44. Hans V.P., and Vidmar N. Jury selection. In: Kerr N.L., and Bray R.M. (Eds). The psychology of the courtroom (1982), Academic Press, New York 39-82
45. Hastie R. Is attorney-conducted voir dire an effective procedure for the selection of impartial juries?. American University Law Review 40 (1991) 703-726
46. Hitchcock A.S. "Deference does not by definition preclude relief": The impact of Miller-El v. Dretke on Batson review in North Carolina Capital Appeals. North Carolina Law Review 84 (2006) 1328-1356
47. Hoffman L.R., and Maier N.R.F. Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62 (1961) 401-407
48. Ito T.A., and Urland G.R. Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (2003) 616-626
49. J. E. B. v. Alabama, 511 U.S. 127 (1994).
50. Jackson J.S. Peremptory challenge: Striking down discrimination in Arkansas's jury selection process. Arkansas Law Review 59 (2006) 93-124
51. Johnson C., and Haney C. Felony voir dire: An exploratory study of its content and effect. Law and Human Behavior 18 (1994) 487-506
52. Kang J., and Banaji M.R. Fair measures: A behavioral realist revision of "affirmative action.". California Law Review 94 (2006) 1063-1118
53. Karpinski A., and Hilton J.L. Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 774-788
54. Kerr N.L., Hymes R.W., Anderson A.B., and Weathers J.E. Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior 19 (1995) 545-567
55. Kerr N.L., Kramer G.P., Carroll J.S., and Alfini J. On the effectiveness of voir dire in criminal cases with prejudicial pretrial publicity: An empirical study. American University Law Review 40 (1991) 665-701
56. Kerr N.L., and MacCoun R.J. The effects of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (1985) 349-363
57. Kinder D.R., and Sears D.O. Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40 (1981) 414-431
58. Kovera M.B., Dickinson J.J., and Cutler B.L. Voir dire and jury selection. In: Goldstein A.M. (Ed). Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Volume 11. Forensic psychology (2002), Wiley, New York 161-175
59. Krieger L.H. The intuitive psychologist behind the bench: Models of gender bias in social psychology and employment discrimination law. Journal of Social Issues 60 (2004) 835-848
60. Kruglanski A.W., and Freund T. The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19 (1983) 448-468
61. Kunda Z., Davies P.G., Adams B.D., and Spencer S.J. The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: Activation, dissipation, and resurrection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (2002) 283-299
62. LaVeist T.A., Arthur M., Morgan A., Plantholt S., and Rubinstein M. Explaining racial differences in receipt of coronary angiography: The role of physician referral and physician specialty. Medical Care Research and Review 60 (2003) 453-467
63. Lewis v. U. S., 146 U.S. 370 (1892).
64. Lieberman J.D., and Sales B.D. What social science teaches us about the jury instruction process. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 3 (1997) 589-644
65. Liptak A. Oddity in picking jurors opens door to racial bias. New York Times (2007, June 4). http://www.nytimes.com Retrieved December 12, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com
66. MacCoun R.J., and Tyler T.R. The basis of citizens' perceptions of the criminal jury: Procedural fairness, accuracy, and efficiency. Law and Human Behavior 12 (1988) 333-352
67. Marder N.S. Beyond gender: Peremptory challenges and the roles of the jury. Texas Law Review 73 (1995) 1041-1138
68. McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).
69. McGonigle S., Becka H., LaFleur R., and Wyatt T. Striking differences. Dallas Morning News (2005). http://www.dallasnews.com/s/dws/spe/2005/jury/index_jury.html Retrieved October 11, 2006, from http://www.dallasnews.com/s/dws/spe/2005/jury/index_jury.html
70. Melilli K.J. Batson in practice: What we have learned about Batson and peremptory challenges. Notre Dame Law Review 71 (1996) 447-503
71. Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2005).
72. Mitchell T.L., Haw R.M., Pfeifer J.E., and Meissner C.A. Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior 29 (2005) 621-637
73. Neal v. Delaware, 103 U.S. 370 (1880).
74. Neighbors H.W., Trierweiler S.J., Ford B.C., and Muroff J.R. Racial differences in DSM diagnosis using a semi-structured instrument: The importance of clinical judgment in the diagnosis of African Americans. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 44 (2003) 237-256
75. Nisbett R.E., and Wilson T.D. Telling more than we can know. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 231-259
76. Norton M.I., Sommers S.R., Apfelbaum E.P., Pura N., and Ariely D. Colorblindness and interracial interaction: Playing the "political correctness game.". Psychological Science 17 (2006) 949-953
77. Norton M.I., Sommers S.R., and Brauner S. Bias in jury selection: Justifying prohibited peremptory challenges. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 20 (2007) 467-479
78. Norton M.I., Sommers S.R., Vandello J.A., and Darley J.M. Mixed motives and racial bias: The impact of legitimate and illegitimate criteria on decision making. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 12 (2006) 36-55
79. Norton M.I., Vandello J.A., and Darley J.M. Casuistry and social category bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2004) 817-831
80. Olczak P.V., Kaplan M.F., and Penrod S. Attorneys' lay psychology and its effectiveness in selecting jurors: Three empirical studies. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 6 (1991) 431-452
81. Page A. Batson's blind-spot: Unconscious stereotyping and the peremptory challenge. Boston University Law Review 85 (2005) 155-262
82. Peters v. Kiff, 407 U.S. 493 (1972).
83. Petty R.E., Fleming M.A., and White P.H. Stigmatized sources and persuasion: Prejudice as a determinant of argument scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (1999) 19-34
84. Phillips K.W., Mannix E., Neale M., and Gruenfeld D. Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40 (2004) 497-510
85. Plant E.A., and Devine P.G. Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (1998) 811-832
86. Pointer v. U.S., 151 U.S. 396 (1894).
87. Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 (1991).
88. Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765 (1995).
89. Ramirez D. A brief historical overview of the use of the mixed jury. American Criminal Law Review 31 (1994) 1213-1224
90. Raphael M.J., and Ungvarsky E.J. Excuses, excuses: Neutral explanations under Batson v. Kentucky. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 27 (1993) 229-275
91. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
92. Rose M.R. The peremptory challenge accused of race or gender discrimination? Some data from one county. Law and Human Behavior 23 (1999) 695-702
93. Rose M.R. A voir dire of voir dire: Listening to jurors' views regarding the peremptory challenge. Chicago-Kent Law Review 78 (2003) 1061-1098
94. Sargent M.J., and Bradfield A.L. Race and information processing in criminal trials: Does the defendant's race affect how the facts are evaluated?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (2004) 995-1008
95. Seltzer R., Venuiti M.A., and Lopes G.M. Juror honesty during voir dire. Journal of Criminal Justice 19 (1991) 451-462
96. Shafir E., Simonson I., and Tversky A. Reason-based choice. Cognition 49 (1993) 11-36
97. Sherman J.W., Stroessner S.J., Conrey F.R., and Azam O.A. Prejudice and stereotype maintenance processes: Attention, attribution, and individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (2005) 607-622
98. Sigelman C.K., Sigelman L., Walkosz B.J., and Nitz M. Black candidates, White voters: Understanding racial bias in political perceptions. American Journal of Political Science 39 (1995) 243-265
99. Snyder v. Louisiana, 552 U.S. (2008).
100. Snyder M., and Swann W.B. Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14 (1978) 148-162
101. Sommers S.R. On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (2006) 597-612
102. Sommers S.R. Race and the decision making of juries. Legal and Criminological Psychology 12 (2007) 171-187
103. Sommers S.R., and Ellsworth P.C. Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (2000) 1367-1379
104. Sommers S.R., and Norton M.I. Lay theories about White racists: What constitutes racism (and what doesn't). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 9 (2006) 117-138
105. Sommers S.R., and Norton M.I. Race-based judgments, race-neutral justifications: Experimental examination of peremptory use and the Batson challenge procedure. Law and Human Behavior 31 (2007) 261-273
106. Staiger A. Whiteness as giftedness: Racial formation at an urban high school. Social Problems 51 (2004) 161-181
107. Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 (1879).
108. Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (1965).
109. Taylor T.S., and Hosch H.M. An examination of jury verdicts for evidence of a similarity-leniency effect, an out-group punitiveness effect or a black sheep effect. Law and Human Behavior 28 (2004) 587-598
110. Turner B.M., Lovell R.D., Young J.D., and Denny W.F. Race and peremptory challenges during voir dire: Do prosecution and defense agree?. Journal of Criminal Justice 14 (1986) 61-69
111. Uhlmann E.L., and Cohen G.L. Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 474-480
112. van Knippenberg A., Dijksterhuis A., and Vermeulen D. Judgement and memory of a criminal act: The effects of stereotypes and cognitive load. European Journal of Social Psychology 29 (1999) 191-201
113. Vescio T.K., and Biernat M. When stereotype-based expectancies impair performance: The effect of prejudice, race, and target quality on judgments and perceiver performance. European Journal of Social Psychology 29 (1999) 961-969
114. White P.H., and Harkins S.G. Race of source effects in the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (1994) 790-807
115. Wittenbrink B., Judd C.M., and Park B. Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 815-827
116. Zeisel H., and Diamond S.S. The effect of peremptory challenges on jury and verdict: An experiment in a federal district court. Stanford Law Review 30 (1978) 491-531