Race-based judgments, race-neutral justifications: Experimental examination of peremptory use and the Batson challenge procedure

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 261-273

  Sommers, Samuel R ^a   Norton, Michael I ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Jury selection; Peremptory challenge; Racial bias; Social judgment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LAW; LAWYER; LEGAL PROCEDURE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; RACISM;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; CRIMINAL LAW; DECISION MAKING; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; JURISPRUDENCE; LAWYERS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREJUDICE; RACE RELATIONS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34248584781     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9048-6     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. America's best law schools (2005). U.S. News and World Report. Retrieved April 14. from: www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/grad/rankings/law/brief/ lawrank brief.php.
2. Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G. G., Zuckerman, D., Weiner, N. A., & Broffitt, B. (2001). The use of peremptory challenges in capital murder trials: A legal and empirical analysis. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 3, 3-169.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Batson v. Kentucky (1986). 476 U.S. 79.
5. Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75-91.
6. Bowers, W. J., Steiner, B. D., & Sandys, M. (2001). Death sentencing in Black and White: An empirical analysis of jurors' race and jury racial composition. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 3, 171-275.
7. Bray, K. (1992). Reaching the final chapter in the story of peremptory challenges. UCLA Law Review, 40, 517-569.
8. Broderick, R. J. (1992). Why the peremptory challenge should be abolished. Temple Law Review, 65, 369-423.
9. Burge, K. (May 24, 2003). SJC urges limits on juror rejections. Boston Globe, p. A1.
10. Commonwealth v. Maldonado (2003). No. SJC-08878 (Mass. SJC May 23).
11. Crandall, C. S., Eshelman, A., & O'Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359-378.
12. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
13. Diamond, S. S., Ellis, L., & Schmidt, E. (1997). Realistic responses to the limitations of Batson v. Kentucky. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 7, 77-95.
14. Diamond, S. S., & Zeisel, H. (1974). A courtroom experiment on juror selection and decision-making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 276-277.
15. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. (1991). 500 U.S. 614.
16. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. Dovidio, & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
17. Hodson, G., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Processes in racial discrimination: Differential weighting of conflicting information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 260-471.
18. J. E. B. v. Alabama (1994). 511 U.S. 127.
19. Kovera, M. B., Dickinson, J. J., & Cutler, B. L. (2002). Voir dire and jury selection. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Volume 11: Forensic Psychology (pp. 161-175). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
20. MacCoun, R. J. (1989). Experimental research on jury decision-making. Science, 244, 1046-1050.
21. McGonigle, S., Becka, H., LaFleur, R., & Wyatt, T. (2005). Striking differences. Dallas Morning News. Retrieved March 15, 2006 from: http://www.dallasnews.com/s/dws/spe/2005/jury/index_jury.html.
22. Melilli, K. J. (1996). Batson in practice: What we have learned about Batson and peremptory challenges. Notre Dame Law Review, 71, 447-503.
23. Miller-El v. Dretke (2005). 545 U.S._.
24. Mitchell, T. L., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 621-637.
25. Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
26. Norton, M. I., Sommers, S. R., Apfelbaum, E. P., Pura, N., & Ariely, D. (in press). Colorblindness and interracial interaction: Playing the "political correctness game." Psychological Science.
27. Norton, M. I., Sommers, S. R., Vandello, J. A., & Darley, J. M. (2006). Mixed motives and racial bias: The impact of legitimate and illegitimate criteria on decision-making. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 36-55.
28. Norton, M. I., Vandello, J. A., & Darley, J. M. (2004). Casuistry and social category bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 817-831.
29. Olczak, P. V., Kaplan, M. F., & Penrod, S. (1991). Attorneys' lay psychology and its effectiveness in selecting jurors: Three empirical studies. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 431-452.
30. Page, A. (2005). Batson's blind-spot: Unconscious stereotyping and the peremptory challenge. Boston University Law Review, 85, 155-262.
31. Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 811-832.
32. Powers v. Ohio (1991). 499 U.S. 400.
33. Raphael, M. J., & Ungvarsky, E. J. (1993). Excuses, excuses: Neutral explanations under Batson v. Kentucky. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 27, 229-275.
34. Rose, M. R. (1999). The peremptory challenge accused of race or gender discrimination? Some data from one county. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 695-702.
35. Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49, 11-36.
36. Sommers, S. R. (2006). On racial diversity and group decision-making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 597-612.
37. Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1367-1379.
38. Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of racial prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 201-229.
39. Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2003). How much do we really know about race and juries? A review of social science theory and research. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 78, 997-1031.
40. Sommers, S. R., & Norton, M. I. (2006). Lay theories about White racists: What constitutes racism (and what doesn't). Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 117-138.
41. Sweeney, L. T., & Haney, C. (1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 179-195.
42. Swain v. Alabama (1965). 380 U.S. 202.
43. Turner, B. M., Lovell, R. D., Young, J. D., & Denny, W. F. (1986). Race and peremptory challenges during voir dire: Do prosecution and defense agree? Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 61-69.