The correlation of DIFOTI to clinical and radiographic images in class II carious lesions

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 139, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1374-1381

  Bin Shuwaish, Mohammed ^a   Yaman, Peter ^b   Dennison, Joseph ^b   Neiva, Gisele ^b  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Caries; Carious lesions; Radiographic film; Radiography, digital; Risk assessment; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENAMEL; FEMALE; FIBER OPTICS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ADULT; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; FEMALE; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSILLUMINATION; X-RAY FILM; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 54449087340     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0049     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Kooistra S, Dennison JB, Yaman P, Burt BA, Taylor GW. Radiographic versus clinical extension of Class II carious lesions using an F-speed film. Oper Dent 2005;30(6):719-726.
2. Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Platin E, Nair M. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Ended 1998;85(1):113-118.
3. Wenzel A. Digital imaging for dental caries. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44(2):319-338, vi.
4. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Caries Res 1994;28(5):363-367.
5. Nair MK, Nair UP. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis. Caries Res 2001;35(5):354-359.
6. Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van der Stelt PF. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29(5): 312-318.
7. Pretty IA, Maupome G. A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice, part 5: emerging technologies for caries detection and diagnosis. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70(8):540I, 540a-540i.
8. Schneiderman A, Elbaum M, Shultz T, Keem S, Greenebaum M, Driller J. Assessment of dental caries with Digital Imaging Fiber-Optic TransIllumination (DIFOTI): in vitro study. Caries Res 1997;31(2): 103-110.
9. Friedman J, Marcus MI. Transillumination of the oral cavity with use of fiber optics. JADA 1970;80(4):801-809.
10. Young DA, Featherstone JD. Digital imaging fiber-optic transillumination, F-speed radiographic film and depth of approximal lesions. JADA 2005;136(12):1682-1687.