A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice: Part 5. Emerging technologies for caries detection and diagnosis

Journal of the Canadian Dental Association

Volumn 70, Issue 8, 2004, Pages

  Pretty, Iain A ^a,e   Maupomé, Gerardo ^b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Decision support techniques; Dental caries diagnosis; Predictive value of tests; Risk assessment methods

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FIBER OPTICS; FLUORESCENCE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LASER; LIGHT; METHODOLOGY; MOUTH DISEASE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CARIES ACTIVITY TESTS; DIAGNOSIS, ORAL; FIBER OPTICS; FLUORESCENCE; HUMANS; LASERS; LIGHT; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSILLUMINATION;

EID: 23444445039     PISSN: 14882159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Pretty IA, Maupome G. A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice: Part 1. Reliability, validity, specificity and sensitivity of diagnostic procedures. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70(4):251-5.
2. Pretty IA, Maupome G. A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice: Part 2. Using predictive values and receiver operating characteristics in assessing diagnostic accuracy. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70(5): 313-6.
3. Pretty IA, Maupome G. A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice: Part 3. Effectiveness of radiographic diagnostic procedures. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70(6):388-94.
4. Maupome G, Pretty IA. A closer look at diagnosis in clinical dental practice: Part 4. Effectiveness of Nonradiographic diagnostic procedures and devices in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70(7):470-4.
5. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ. A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent 2002; 62(4):201-13.
6. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ. Systematic reviews of selected dental caries diagnostic and management methods. J Dent Educ 2001; 65(10):960-8.
7. Ross G. Caries diagnosis with the DIAGNOdent laser: a user's product evaluation. Ont Dent 1999; 76(2):21-4.
8. Pretty IA, Lalloo A, Smith PW, Higham SM. Development of an occlusal caries index for Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence and DiagnoDent. J Dent Res 2003; 82(Spec Issue C):475.
9. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts N, Longbottom C, Reich E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999; 33(4):261-6.
10. Tam LE, McComb D. Diagnosis of occlusal caries: Part II. Recent diagnostic technologies. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67(8):459-63.
11. Attrill DC, Ashley PF. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Br Dent J 2001; 190(8):440-3.
12. Lussi A, Megert B, Longbottom C, Reich E, Francescut P. Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109(1):14-9.
13. Sanchez-Figueras A Jr. Occlusal pit-and-fissure caries diagnosis: a problem no more. A science-based diagnostic approach using a laser-based fluorescence device. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003; 24(5 Suppl):3-11.
14. Pinelli C, Campos Serra M, de Castro Monteiro Loffredo L. Validity and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detecting the activity of white-spot lesions on free smooth surfaces in vivo. Caries Res 2002; 36(1):19-24.
15. Wicht MJ, Haak R, Stutzer H, Strohe D, Noack MJ. Intra- and interexaminer variability and validity of laser fluorescence and electrical resistance readings on root surface lesions. Caries Res 2002; 36(4):241-8.
16. Sheehy EC, Brailsford SR, Kidd EA, Beighton D, Zoitopoulos L. Comparison between visual examination and a laser fluorescence system for in vivo diagnosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res 2001; 35(6):421-6.
17. Shi XQ, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Mansson B. Validation of DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth-surface caries: an in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 2001; 59(2):74-8.
18. Shi XQ, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Mansson B. Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries. Caries Res 2001; 35(1):21-6.
19. Shi XQ, Welander U, Angmar-Mansson B. Occlusal caries detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and radiography: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res 2000; 34(2):151-8.
20. Takamori K, Hokari N, Okumura Y, Watanabe S. Detection of occlusal caries under sealants by use of a laser fluorescence system. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001; 19(5):267-71.
21. Cortes DF, Ellwood RP, Ekstrand KR. An in vitro comparison of a combined FOTI/visual examination of occlusal caries with other caries diagnostic methods and the effect of stain on their diagnostic performance. Caries Res 2003; 37(1):8-16.
22. Davies GM, Worthington HV, Clarkson JE, Thomas P, Davies RM. The use of fibre-optic transillumination in general dental practice. Br Dent J 2001; 191(3):145-7.
23. Cleaton-Jones P, Daya N, Hargreaves JA, Cortes D, Hargreaves V, Fatti LP. Examiner performance with visual, probing and FOTI caries diagnosis in the primary dentition. SADJ 2001; 56(4):182-5.
24. Fennis-Ie YL, Verdibschot EH, van't Hof MA. Performance of some diagnostic systems in the prediction of occlusal caries in permanent molars in 6- and 11-year-old children. J Dent 1998; 26(5-6):403-8.
25. Schneiderman A, Elbaum M, Shultz T, Keem S, Greenebaum M, Driller J. Assessment of dental caries with Digital Imaging Fiber-Optic Transillumination (DIFOTI): in vitro study. Caries Res 1997; 31(2):103-10.
26. Peers A, Hill FJ, Mitropoulos CM, Holloway PJ. Validity and reproducibility of clinical examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bitewing radiology for the diagnosis of small approximal carious lesions: an in vitro study. Caries Res 1993; 27(4):307-11.
27. Mitropoulos CM. A comparison of fibre-optic transillumination with bitewing radiographs. Br Dent J 1985; 159(1):21-3.
28. Sidi AD, Naylor MN. A comparison of bitewing radiography and interdental transillumination as adjuncts to the clinical identification of approximal caries in posterior teeth. Br Dent J 1988; 164(1):15-8.
29. Angmar-Mansson B, ten Bosch JJ. Advances in methods for diagnosing coronal caries - a review. Adv Dent Res 1993; 7(2):70-9.
30. Young DA. New caries detection technologies and modern caries management: merging the strategies. Gen Dent 2002; 50(4):320-31.
31. Tranaeus S, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Kuhnisch J, Stosser L, Angmar-Mansson B. Potential applications and limitations of Quantitative Light-induced fluorescence in dentistry. Med Laser Appl 2001; 16:195-204.
32. van der Veen JH, Ferreira Zandona AG, de Josselin de Jong E, Stookey GK. Clinical evaluation of an intra-oral quantitative light-induced fluorescence camera. Caries Res 1998; 32:296.
33. Angmar-Mansson B, ten Bosch JJ. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF): a method for assessment of incipient caries lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30(6):298-307.
34. van der Veen MH, de Josselin de Jong E. Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence for assessing early caries lesions. Monogr Oral Sci 2000; 17:144-62.
35. Bjelkhagen H, Sundstrom F, Angmar-Mansson B, Ryden H. Early detection of enamel caries by the luminescence excited by visible laser light. Swed Dent J 1982; 6(1):1-7.
36. Angmar-Mansson B, ten Bosch JJ. Optical methods for the detection and quantification of caries. Adv Dent Res 1987; 1(1):14-20.
37. Sundstrom F, Hafstrom-Bjorkman U, Strom J, Angmar-Mansson B, Frostell G, Takazoe I. Evaluation of a model for short-term clinical testing of cariogenicity. J Biol Buccale 1989; 17(2):115-20.
38. Hafstrom-Bjorkman U, Sundstrom F, de Josselin de Jong E, Oliveby A, Angmar-Mansson B. Comparison of laser fluorescence and longitudinal microradiography for quantitative assessment of in vitro enamel caries. Caries Res 1992; 26(4):241-7.
39. de Josselin de Jong E, Sundstrom F, Westerling H, Tranaeus S, ten Bosch JJ, Angmar-Mansson B. A new method for in vivo quantification of changes in initial enamel caries with laser fluorescence. Caries Res 1995; 29(1):2-7.
40. al-Khateeb S, Oliveby A, de Josselin de Jong E, Angmar-Mansson B. Laser fluorescence quantification of remineralisation in situ of incipient enamel lesions: influence of fluoride supplements. Caries Res 1997; 31(2):132-40.
41. Ando M, van der Veen M, Schemehorn BR, Stookey G. Comparative study to quantify demineralised enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced fluoresence. Caries Res 2001; 35(6):464-70.
42. de Josselin de Jong E, van der Veen JH. Video Repositioning of QLF images. Proceedings of Optical Methods in Caries Detection, Groningen, 2000.
43. Amaechi BT, Higham SM. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence: a potential tool for general dental assessment. J Biomed Opt 2002; 7(1):7-13.
44. Ando M, Hall AF, Eckert GJ, Schemehorn BR, Analoui M, Stookey GK. Relative ability of laser fluorescence techniques to quantitate early mineral loss in vitro. Caries Res 1997; 31(2):125-31.
45. Pretty IA, Ingram G, Agalamanyi EA, Edgar WM, Higham SM. The use of fluorescein-enhanced quantitative light-induced fluorescence to monitor de- and re-mineralisation of in vitro root caries. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30(12):1151-6.
46. Lagerweij M, Beiswanger AJ, van der Veen M, Ferreira Zandona AG, Stookey G. Interexaminer variability of analysis of QLF images obtained from a patient. J Dent Res 1998; 77:713.
47. Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Higham SM. Detection of in vitro demineralization of primary teeth using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF). Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12(3):158-67.
48. Amaechi BT, Higham SM. Development of a quantitative method to monitor the effect of a tooth whitening agent. J Clin Dent 2002; 13(3):100-3.
49. Ando M, van Der Veen MH, Schemehorn BR, Stookey GK. Comparative study to quantify demineralized enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced fluorescence techniques. Caries Res 2001; 35(6):464-70.
50. Tranaeus S, Al-Khateeb S, Bjorkman S, Twetman S, Angmar-Mansson B. Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to monitor incipient lesions in caries-active children. A comparative study of remineralisation by fluoride varnish and professional cleaning. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109(2):71-5.
51. Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Higham SM. The use of QLF to quantify in vitro whitening in a product testing model. Br Dent J 2001; 191(10): 566-9.
52. Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Higham SM. The validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to quantify acid erosion of human enamel. Arch Oral Biol 2004; 49(4):285-94.
53. Ando M, Analoui M, Schemehorn BR, Eggertsson H, Stookey GK. In vitro comparison of three caries diagnosis techniques. Caries Res 1999; 33(3):298.
54. ten Cate JM, Lagerweij MD, Wefel JS, Angmar-Mansson B, Hall AF, Ferreira Zandona AG, and others. In vitro validation studies of Quantitative Light-induced Fluoresence. Early detection of dental caries II. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Indiana Conference, 2000, Indiana University Press; 230-46.
55. Tranaeus S, Shi XQ, Lindgren LE, Trollsas K, Angmar-Mansson B. In vivo repeatability and reproducibility of the quantitative light-induced fluorescence method. Caries Res 2002; 36(1):3-10.
56. DeSchepper EJ, Hall AF, Ando M, Beiswanger BB. Secondary caries detection: laser fluorescence imaging versus traditional clinical examination. Caries Res 1996; 30:273-4.
57. Benedict SL, DeSchepper EJ, Hall AF, Analoui M, Willis G, Dixon S, Eckert G, and other. Laser fluorescence and secondary caries detection. J Dent Res 1996; 75:86.
58. Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Dunn E, Ando M, Eggertsson H, Eckert G, Fontana M, Stookey G. Detection of small carious lesions on root surfaces of extracted teeth. Caries Res 2001; 35:282.
59. Hall AF, DeSchepper E, Ando M, Stookey GK. Dye-enhanced laser fluorescence method. Presented at 1st Annual Indiana Conference. Indianapolis, 1996a., Indiana University Press; 156-71.
60. Ashley PF, Blinkhorn AS, Davies RM. Occlusal caries diagnosis: an in vitro histological validation of the Electronic Caries Monitor (ECM) and other methods. J Dent 1998; 26(2):83-8.
61. Alwas-Danowska HM, Plasschaert AJ, Suliborski S, Verdonschot EH. Reliability and validity issues of laser fluorescence measurements in occlusal caries diagnosis. J Dent 2002; 30(4):129-34.
62. Bamzahim M, Shi XQ, Angmar-Mansson B. Occlusal caries detection and quantification by DIAGNOdent and Electronic Caries Monitor: in vitro comparison. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60(6):360-4.
63. Heinrich-Weltzien R, Kuhnisch J, van der Veen M, de Josselin de Jong E, Stosser L. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) - a potential method for the dental practitioner. Quintessence Int 2003; 34(3):181-8.
64. de Josselin de Jong E, Buchalla W, van der Veen M. QLF: New Developments. in Early Caries Detection III. 2003. Indiana, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. In press.
65. Pretty IA, Pender N, Edgar WM, Higham SM. The in vitro detection of early enamel de- and re-mineralization adjacent to bonded orthodontic cleats using quantitative light-induced fluorescence. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25(3):217-23.
66. Bader JD, Shugars DA. What do we know about how dentists make caries-related treatment decisions? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25(1):97-103.
67. Gale J, Marsden P. Medical diagnosis. 1983, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Thompson R. The psychology of thinking. 1959, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
69. Maupome G, Sheiham A. Explanatory models in the interpretations of clinical features of dental patients within a university dental education setting. Eur J Dent Educ 2002; 6(1):2-8.
70. Maupome G, Sheiham A. Clinical decision-making in restorative dentistry. Content-analysis of diagnostic thinking processes and concurrent concepts used in an educational environment. Eur J Dent Educ 2000; 4(4):143-52.
71. Kay EJ, Nuttall NM. Relationship between dentists' treatment attitudes and restorative decisions made on the basis of simulated bitewing radiographs. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994; 22(2):71-4.