The neglected king: The customer in the new knowledge ecology of innovation

Economic Geography

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 253-280

  Grabher, Gernot ^a   Ibert, Oliver ^a   Flohr, Saskia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Communities of practice; Epistemic communities; Geographies of virtual interaction; Knowledge creation; User led innovation

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

HARNESS;

EID: 54349097329     PISSN: 00130095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00365.x     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Allen, J. S. 2000. Power/economic knowledge. Symbolic and spatial formations. In Knowledge, space, economy, ed. J. R. Bryson, P. W. Daniels, N. Henry, and J. Pollard, 15-33. London: Routledge.
2. Amin, A., and Cohendet, P. 2004. Architectures of knowledge: Firms, capabilities and communities. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
3. Amin, A., and Roberts, J. 2008. Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy 37:353-69.
4. Amin, A., and Thrift, N. 1992. Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 16:571-87.
5. Aoyama, Y. 2007. The role of consumption and globalization in a cultural industry: The case of flamenco. Geoforum 38:103-113.
6. Barnett, C.; Cloke, P.; Clarke, N.; and Malpass, A. 2004. Consuming ethics: Articulating the subjects and spaces of consumption. Antipode 37:23-45.
7. Bathelt, H.; Malmberg, A.; and Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28:31-56.
8. Beagle Research Group 2006. Drop in, turn on, know more - Customer communities invigorate innovation, drive loyalty and eliminate noise. Stoughton, Mass.: Beagle Research Group.
9. Becattini, G. 1978. The development of light industry in Tuscany: An interpretation. Economic Notes 2:107-23.
10. Blackler, F. 1995. Knowledge, knowledge work and organization: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies 16:1021-46.
11. Boczkowski, P. 2004. Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
12. Boyd, D. 2004. Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI 2004) ACM, 24-29 April 2004:1-15.
13. Brady, T., and Davies, A. 2004. Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Special issue on "Project Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge," Organization Studies 25:1601-21.
14. Bridge, G., and Smith, A. 2003. Intimate encounters: Culture economy-commodity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21:257-68.
15. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. 1991. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science 2:40-57.
16. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. 2001. Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science 12:198-213.
17. Bunnell, T. G., and Coe, N. M. 2001. Spaces and scales of innovation. Progress in Human Geography 25:569-89.
18. Callon, M.; Meadel, C.; and Rabeharisoa, V. 2002. The economy of qualities. Economy and Society 31:194-217.
19. Callon, M., and Muniesa, F. 2005. Economic markets as collective devices. Organization Studies 26:1229-50.
20. Camagni, R., ed. 1991. Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. London: Belhaven Press.
21. Cawson, A.; Haddon, L.; and Miles, I. 1995. The shape of things to consume: Delivering information technology into the home. Aldershot, U.K.: Avebury.
22. Chesbrough, H.W. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
23. Coe, N. M., and Hess, M. 2006. Global production networks: Debates and challenges. Position paper for the CPERG workshop, 25-26 January 2007, University of Manchester. Available online: http:// www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/geography/research/gpe/gpnworkshop.htm
24. Cowan, R.; David, P A.; and Foray, D. 2000. The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change 9:212-53.
25. Currah, A. 2006. Hollywood versus the Internet: The media and entertainment industries in a digital and networked economy. Journal of Economic Geography 6:439-68.
26. Currah, A. 2007. Hollywood, the Internet and the world: A geography of disruptive innovation. Industry and Innovation 14:359-84.
27. Dahan, E., and Hauser, J. R. 2002. The virtual customer. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19:332-53.
28. Davies, A., and Brady, T. 2000. Organizational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: Towards repeatable solutions. Research Policy 29:931-53.
29. DeMonaco, H. J.; Ali, A.; and von Hippel, E. 2006. The major role of clinicians in the discovery of off-label drug therapies. Pharmacotherapy 26:323-32.
30. Edquist, C. 2001. Innovation policy - A systemic approach. In The globalizing teaming economy. Major socio-economic trends and European innovation policy, ed. B.-A. Lundvall and D. Archibugi, 219-38. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
31. Edwards, K. 2001. Epistemic communities, situated learning and open source software development. Available online: http://opensource.mit.edu/ papers/kasperedwards-ec.pdf
32. Ferris, T. 2002. Seeing in the dark: How backyard storgazers are probing deep space and guarding earth from interplanetary peril. New York: Simon & Schuster.
33. Fosstenløkken, S. M.; Løwendahl, B. R.; and Revang, Ø. 2003. Knowledge development through client interaction: A comparative study. Organization Studies 24:859-79.
34. Franke, N., and Piller, F. 2004.Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21:401-15.
35. Franke, N., and Shah, S. 2003, How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy 32:157-78.
36. Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The entropy low and the economic process. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
37. Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P.; and Trow, M. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
38. Gilmore, J. H., and Pine, B. J., II. 2000. Markets of one: Creating customer-unique value through mass customization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
39. Girard, M., and Stark, D. 2002. Distributing intelligence and organizing creativity in new media projects. Environment and Planning A 34:1927-49.
40. Goodstein, A. 2007. Valley of the virtual dolls. Girls are spending hours dressing up avatars online - And both startups and big brands such as Disney and Mattel are vying for their attention. Business Week, 23 May. Available online: http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/ may2007/tc20070523_707199.htm?chan=top+news+index_technology
41. Grabher, G. 2002. The project ecology of advertising: Task, talents and teams. Special issue on "Production in Projects: Economic Geographies of Temporary Collaboration," Regional Studies 36:245-63.
42. Grabher, G. 2004. Architectures of project-based learning: Creating and sedimenting knowledge in project ecologies. Special issue on "Project Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge," Organization Studies 25:1491-514.
43. Grabher G., and Ibert, O. 2006. Bad company: The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks. Journal of Economic Geography 6:251-71.
44. Grabher, G., and Maintz, J. 2006. Learning in personal networks: Collaborative knowledge production in virtual forums. Working paper series. New York: Center on Organizational Innovation. Available online: http://www.coi.columbia.edu/workingpapers.html
45. Gruner, K., and Homburg, C. 2000. Does customer interaction enhance new product performance? Journal of Business Research 49:1-14.
46. Haddon, L. 2002. Information and communication technologies and the role of consumers in innovation. In Innovation by demand: Interdisciplinary approaches to the study of demand and its role in innovation, ed. A. McMeekin, K. Green, M. Tomlinson, and V. Walsh, 151-67. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press.
47. Harvey, M.; Quilley, S.; and Beynon, H. 2002. Exploring the tomato: Transformations of nature, society and economy. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
48. Haythornthwaite, C. 2005. Introduction: Computer-mediated collaborative practices. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10: article 11. Available online: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/ haythornthwaite.html
49. Hellström, M. 2003. The project menu - Customer unique solutions from non-unique parts. Unpublished manuscript.
50. Herstatt, C., and von Hippel, E. 1992. Developing new product concepts via the lead user method. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9:213-21.
51. Hienerth, C. 2006. The commercialization of user innovations: The development of the rodeo kayak industry. R&D Management 36:273-94.
52. Howells, J. 2003. Innovation, consumption and knowledge: Services and encapsulation. CRIC Discussion Paper 62, ESRC Research Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K. Available online: http://www.cric.ac.uk/cric/ papers.htm#Discussion Papers
53. Hughes, A. 2006. Learning to trade ethically: Knowledgeable capitalism, retailers and contested commodity chains. Geoforum 37:1007-19.
54. Ibert, O. 2004. Projects and firms as discordant complements: Organizational learning in the Munich software ecology. Research Policy 33:1529-46.
55. Ibert, O. 2007. Towards a geography of knowledge creation: The ambivalences between "knowledge as an object" and "knowing in practice." Regional Studies 41:103-14.
56. Isaksen, A. 2004. Knowledge-based clusters and urban location: The clustering of software consultancy in Oslo. Urban Studies 41:1157-74.
57. Jacobs, J. 1969. The economy of cities. New York: Random House.
58. Jeppesen, L. B. 2001. Making consumer knowledge available and useful: The case of computer games. Working paper No. 01-10. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics (DRUID), Copenhagen. Available online: http://ideas.repec.org/s/aal/abbswp.html
59. Jeppesen, L. B., and Molin, M. 2003. Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 15:363-83.
60. Kawamura, Y 2006. Japanese teens as producers of street fashion. Current Sociology 54:784-801.
61. Kline, S., and Rosenberg, N. 1986. An overview of innovation. In The positive sum strategy, ed. R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, 275-305. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
62. Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
63. Knorr Cetina, K. 2001. Objectual practice. In The practice turn in contemporary theory, ed. T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, and E. von Savigny, 175-88. London: Routledge.
64. Kogut, B., and Metiu, A. 2001. Open-source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17:248-64.
65. Kollock, P. 1999. The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In Communities in Cyberspace, ed. M. Smith and P. Kollock, 3-28. London: Routledge.
66. Kristensson, P.; Gustafsson, A,; and Archer, T. 2004. Harnessing the creative potential among users. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21:4-14.
67. Kunz, W. H., and Mangold, M. 2004. Hybride communities als Treiber des Kundenwertes [Hybrid communities as drivers of customer value]. In Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen Communities. Kundenwünsche erfahren und Innovationen realisieren [Product development with virtual communities: Knowing the customers' wishes and realizing innovations), ed. C. Herstatt and J. G. Sander, 69-98. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
68. Lakhani, K. R., and von Hippel, E. 2003. How open-source software works: "Free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy 32:923-43.
69. Lakhani, K. R., and Wolf, R. 2005. Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source projects. In Perspectives on free and open source software, ed. J. Feller, D. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, and K. Lakhami, 3-21. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
70. Lancaster, K. J. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 14:133-56.
71. Lancaster, K. J. 1971. Consumer demand. A new approach. New York: Columbia University Press.
72. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
73. Lerman, K., and Austin, M. 2006. What companies gain from listening. The effect of community membership on members'attitudes and behavior in relation to the sponsoring company. Watertown, Mass.: Communispace Corporation.
74. Lerner, J., and Tirole, J. 2000: The simple economics of open source. Working paper 7600. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. Available online: http://www.hbs.edu/research/facpubs/ workingpapers/papers2/9900/00-059.pdf
75. Lettl, C., and Gemünden, H. G. 2005. The entrepreneurial role of innovative users. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 20:339-46.
76. Leyshon, A.;Webb, P.; French, S.;Thrift, N.; and Crewe, L. 2005. On the reproduction of the musical economy after the Internet. Media, Culture & Society 27:177-209.
77. Livingstone, D. N. 2002. Science, space and hermeneutics. Hettner Lecture 2001. Heidelberg, Germany: Department of Geography, University of Heidelberg.
78. Livingstone, D. N. 2003. Putting science in its place. Geographies of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79. Lundvall, B. Å. 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national innovation system. In Technology and economic theory, ed. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete, 349-69. London: Pinter.
80. Lundvall, B. Å. 1992. User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation. In National systems of innovation. Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning, ed. B. Å. Lundvall, 45-67. London: Pinter.
81. Lüthje, C. 2004. Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field. An empirical study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation 24:683-95.
82. Lüthje, C.; Herstatt, C.; and von Hippel, E. 2005. User-innovators and "local" information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy 34:951-65.
83. Maillat, D. 1991. The innovation process and the role of the milieu. In Regions reconsidered: Economic networks, innovation, and local development in industrialized countries, ed. E. Bergman, G. Maier, and F. Tödtling, 103-17. London: Mansell.
84. Malmberg, A., and Power, D. 2005. On the role of global demand in local innovation processes. In Rethinking regional innovation and change. Path dependency or regional breakthrough?, ed. G. Fuchs and P. Shapira, 273-90. New York: Springer.
85. Maskell, P.; Bathelt, H.; and Malmberg, A. 2006. Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters. European Planning Studies 14:997-1013.
86. Mateos-Garcia, J., and Steinmueller, W.E. 2006. Open, but how much? Growth, conflict and institutional evolution in Wikipedia and Debian, Paper presented at DIME International Conference on Communities of Practice, University of Durham, 26-27 October 2006. Available online: http://www.dime-eu.org/wp12/workshop2006/programme/session5#paper1
87. Mattsson, H. 2006. How does knowledge production take place? On locating and mapping science and similar unruly activities. In Taking place: Locating science, technology and business studies, ed. E. Baraldi, H. Fors, and A. Houltz, 351-71. Sagamore Beach, Mass.: Science History Publications.
88. McMeekin, A.; Green, K.; Tomlinson, M.; and Walsh, V. 2002. Innovation by demand? An interdisciplinary approach to the study of demand and its role in innovation. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press.
89. Mowery, D., and Rosenberg, N. 1979. The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy 8:102-53.
90. Mühlbacher, H.; Füller, J.; and Jawecki; G. 2007. Online Communities und Innovation. Wie lässt sich das Wissen von Online Communities für die Entwicklung neuer Leistungen nutzen [Online communities and innovation: How can the knowledge of online communities be utilized for the development of new services]. In Vielfalt und Einheit in der Marketingwissenschaft [Diversity and unity within marketing science], ed. T Bayón, A. Herrmann, and F. Huber, 97-110.Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
91. Neff, G., and Stark, D. 2003. Permanently beta: Responsive organization in the Internet-era. In Society online: The Internet in context, ed. P. Howard and S. Jones, 173-88. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
92. Obradovich, J. H., and Woods, D. D., 1996. Users as designers: How people cope with poor HCI design in computer-based medical devices. Human Factors 38:574-92.
93. Oinas, P. 2000. Distance and learning: Does proximity matter? In Knowledge, innovation and economic growth: The theory and practice of learning regions, ed. F. Boekema, K. Morgan, S. Bakkers, and R. Rutten, 57-73. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
94. Olson, E. L., and Bakke, G. 2001. Implementing the lead user method in a high technology firm: A longitudinal study of intentions versus actions. Journal of Product Innovation Management 18:388-95.
95. Oudshoorn, N., and Pinch, T. 2003. Introduction: How users and non-users matter. In How users matter. The co-construction of users and technologies, ed. N. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch, 1-25. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
96. Piller, F., and Walcher, D. 2006. Toolkits for idea competitions: A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management 36:307-18.
97. Pinch, T. 2003. Giving birth to new users: How the minimoog was sold to rock and roll. In How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies, ed. N. Oudshoorn and T. Pinch, 247-70. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
98. Pine, B. J., II. 1993. Mass customization - The new frontier in business competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
99. Porter, M. E. 1998. Clusters and the new economies of competition. Harvard Business Review December:77-90.
100. Powell, W.W.; Koput, K.W.; and Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quaterly 41:116-45.
101. Prahalad, C. K., and Ramaswamy, V. 2004. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
102. Ren, Y.; Kraut, R.; and Kiesler, S. 2007. Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Special issue on "Online Communities," Organization Studies 28:377-408.
103. Riles, A. 2000: The network inside out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
104. Rosenberg, N. 1982. Learning by using. In Inside the black box: Technology and economic, ed. N. Rosenberg, 120-40. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
105. Rowley, J. 2002. Eight questions for customer knowledge management in e-business. Journal of Knowledge Management 5:500-11.
106. Sassen, S. 1994. Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Pine Forge Press.
107. Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
108. Saxenian, A. 2006. The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
109. Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and economic growth. Boston: Harvard University Press.
110. Shah, S. 2000. Sources and patterns of innovation in a consumer products field: Innovations in sporting equipment. MIT Sloan Working paper #4105. MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Available online: http://opensource.mit.edu/ online¶pers.php?lim=1000
111. Shah, S. 2005. Open beyond software. In Open Source 2.0: The continuing evolution, ed. D. Cooper, C. DiBona, and M. Stone, 339-60. Sebastopol, Calif: O'Reilly Media.
112. Shaw, B. 1985. The role of interaction between the user and the manufacturer in medical equipment innovation. R&D Management 15:283-92.
113. Stegbauer, C. 2004. Einige soziologische Aspekte von Online-Communities [Some sociological aspects of online communities], In Produktentwicklung mit virtuellen Communities. Kundenwünsche erfahren und Innovationen realisieren [Product development with virtual communities: Knowing the customers' wishes and realizing innovations], ed. C. Herstatt and J. G. Sander, 17-44. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
114. Strambach, S. 2002. Change in the innovation process: New knowledge production and competitive cities - The case of Stuttgart. European Planning Studies 10:215-31.
115. Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
116. Surowiecki, J. 2004. The wisdom of crowds:Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. London: Little, Brown.
117. Tapscott, D., and Williams, A. D. 2006. Wikinomics - How mass-collaboration changes everything. New York: Penguin.
118. Thrift, N. 2000. Performing cultures in the new economy. Transactions of the Association of American Geographers 90:674-91.
119. Thrift, N. 2006. Re-inventing invention: New tendencies in capitalist commodification. Economy and Society 35:279-306.
120. Urban, G., and von Hippel, E. 1988. Lead user analysis for the development of new industrial products. Management Science 34:569-82.
121. Urry, J. 2003. Social networks, travel and talk. British Journal of Sociology 54:155-75.
122. von Hippel, E. 1976. The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy 5:212-39.
123. von Hippel, E. 1978. Successful industrial products from customer ideas: Presentation of a new-customer active paradigm with evidence and implications. Journal of Marketing 42:39-49.
124. von Hippel, E. 1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32:791-805.
125. von Hippel, E. 1994. "Sticky information" and the locus of problem-solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science 40:429-39.
126. von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
127. von Hippel, E., and Katz, R. 2002. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science 48:821-33.
128. Walsh, V; Cohen, C.; and Richards, A. 2001. The incorporation of user needs in Telecom product design. In Innovation by demand: Interdisciplinary approaches to the study of demand and its role in innovation, ed. A. McMeekin, K. Green, M. Tomlinson, and V. Walsh, 168-86. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press.
129. Weber, S. 2004. The success of open source. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
130. Wellman, B. 2001. Computer networks as social networks. Science 293:2031-34.
131. Wellman, B.; Boase, J.; and Chen, W. 2002. The networked nature of community on and off the Internet. IT & Society 1:151-65.
132. Wiertz, C., and de Ruyter, K. 2007. Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Special issue on "Online Communities," Organization Studies 28:347-76.
133. Wood, P. 1996. Business services, the management of change and regional development in the UK: A corporate client perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21:649-65.