Patients' experience with ambulatory urodynamics

Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 391-396

  Oh, Seung June ^a   Son, Hwancheol ^a   Jeong, Jeong Yun ^b   Ku, Ja Hyeon ^c  

^a Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Eulji University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Seoul Veterans Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Ambulatory monitoring; Anxiety; Detrusor instability; Pain; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BOREDOM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCOME; MALE; OVERACTIVE BLADDER; PAIN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIOECONOMICS; URODYNAMICS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; URINARY BLADDER, OVERACTIVE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 33750328283     PISSN: 00365599     EISSN: 16512065     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00365590600744014     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Van Waalwijk van Doorn ES, Remmers A, Janknegt RA. Conventional and extramural ambulatory urodynamic testing of the lower urinary tract in female volunteers. J Urol 1992;47:1319-26.
2. Webb RJ, Griffiths CJ, Neal DE. Ambulatory monitoring and electronic measurement of urinary leakage in the diagnosis of detrusor instability and incontinence. Br J Urol 1991;68:148-52.
3. Robertson AS, Griffiths CJ, Ramsden PD, Neal DE. Bladder function in healthy volunteers: ambulatory monitoring and conventional urodynamic studies. Br J Urol 1994;73:242-9.
4. Heslington K, Hilton P. Ambulatory monitoring and conventional cystometry in asymptomatic female volunteers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:434-41.
5. Van Waalwijk van Doorn E, Anders K, Khullar V, Kulseng-Hanssen S, Pesce F, Robertson A, et al. Standardisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: report of the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society for Ambulatory Urodynamic Studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2000;19:113-25.
6. Anders K, Cardozo L, Ashman O, Khullar V. Morbidity after ambulatory urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:461-3.
7. Salvatore S, Khullar V, Anders K, Cardozo D. Reducing artifacts in ambulatory urodynamics. Br J Urol 1998;81:211-4.
8. Ku JH, Kim SW, Kim HH, Paick JS, Son H, Oh SJ. Patient experience with a urodynamic study: a prospective study in 208 patients. J Urol 2004;171:2307-10.
9. Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MI. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anesthesia 1976;31:1191-8.
10. Maxwell C. Sensitivity and accuracy of the visual analogue scale: a psycho-physical classroom experiment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1978;6:15-24.
11. Kindler CH, Harms C, Amsler F, Ihde-Scholl T, Scheidegger D. The visual analog scale allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients' anesthetic concerns. Anesth Analg 2000;90:706-12.
12. Oh WS, Shim JC. A randomized controlled trial of radio-frequency denervation of the ramus communicans nerve for chronic discogenic low back pain. Clin J Pain 2004;20:55-60.
13. Moettus A, Sklar D, Tandberg D. The effect of physician gender on women's perceived pain and embarrassment during pelvic examination. Am J Emerg Med 1999;17:635-7.
14. Kelley L, Sklar DP, Johnson DR, Tandberg D. Women's perception of pain and distress during intravenous catheterization and urethral mini-catheterization. Am J Emerg Med 1997;15:570-2.
15. Badner NH, Nielson WR, Munk S, Kwiatkowska C, Gelb AW. Preoperative anxiety: detection and contributing factors. Can J Anaesth 1990;37:444-7.
16. Domar AD, Everett LL, Keller MG. Preoperative anxiety: is it a predictable entity? Anesth Analg 1989;69:763-7.
17. Grabow L, Buse R. Preoperative anxiety-anxiety about the operation, anxiety about anesthesia, anxiety about pain? Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 1990;40:255-63.
18. Shevde K, Panagopoulos G. A survey of 800 patients' knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1991;73:190-8.
19. Van Wijk MG, Smalhout B. A postoperative analysis of the patient's view of anesthesia in a Netherlands' teaching hospital. Anaesthesia 1990;45:679-82.
20. Van Waalwijk van Doorn ES, Remmers A, Janknegt RA. Extramural ambulatory urodynamic monitoring during natural filling and normal daily activities: evaluation of 100 patients. J Urol 1991;146:124-31.
21. Shafer A, Fish MP, Gregg KM, Seavello J, Kosek P. Preoperative anxiety and fear: a comparison of assessments by patients and anesthesia and surgery residents. Anesth Analg 1996;83:1285-91.
22. Shevde K, Panagopoulos G. A survey of 800 patients' knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1991;73:190-8.
23. Tangney JP, Miller RS, Flicker L, Barlow DH. Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? J Pers Soc Psychol 1996;70:1256-69.
24. Cooke M, Ronalds C. Women doctors in urban general practice: the patients. Br Med J 1985;290:753-5.
25. Philliber SG, Jones J. Staffing a contraceptive service for adolescents: the importance of sex, race and age. Public Health Rep 1992;97:165-9.