A comparison of ambulatory and conventional urodynamic studies in men with borderline outlet obstruction

BJU International

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 400-409

  Rosario, D J ^a   MacDiarmid, S A ^a,b   Radley, S C ^a   Chapple, C R ^a  

^a ROYAL HALLAMSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambulatory monitoring; Bladder outlet obstruction; Detrusor instability; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; BLADDER NECK STENOSIS; BLADDER PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOMETRY; DETRUSOR DYSSYNERGIA; DETRUSOR MUSCLE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCLE FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINE FLOW RATE; URODYNAMICS;

CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PRESSURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URINARY BLADDER NECK OBSTRUCTION; URINARY RETENTION; URINATION; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0033031359     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1999.00927.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. 1 Neal DE, Ramsden PH, Sharples L et al. Outcome of elective prostatectomy. Br Med J 1989; 299: 762-7
2. 2 Rollema HJ, Mastrigt RV. Improved indication and follow-up in transurethral resection of the prostate using the computer program CLIM. a prospective study. J Urol 1992; 148: 111-6
3. 3 Robertson AS, Griffiths C, Neal DE. Conventional urodynamics and ambulatory monitoring in the definition and management of bladder outflow obstruction. J Urol 1996; 155: 506-11
4. 4 Lim CS, Abrams P. The Abrams-Griffiths nomogram. World J Urol 1995; 13: 34-9
5. 5 Schäfer W. Analysis of bladder-outlet function with the linearised passive urethral resistance relation, linPURR, and a disease-specific approach for grading obstruction: from complex to simple. World J Urol 1995; 13: 47-58
6. 6 Schäfer W, de la Rosette JJMCH, Höfner K et al. study group. The ICS-BPH study: pressure-flow studies, quality control and initial analysis. Neurourol Urodyn 1994; 13: 491-2
7. 7 Webb RJ, Griffiths CJ, Zachariah KK, Neal DE. Filling and voiding pressures measured by ambulatory monitoring and conventional studies during natural and artificial bladder filling. J Urol 1991; 146: 815-8
8. 8 Altman DG. How large a sample? In Gore SM, Altman DG, eds, Statistics in Practice, 1st edn. Chapter 3. BMA publications, 1982: 7
9. 9 Abrams P, Blavias JG, Stanton SL, Anderson JT. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1988; Suppl 114: 5-19
10. 10 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307-10
11. 11 Griffiths DJ. In Urodynamics - the mechanics and hydrodynamics of the lower urinary tract, 1st edn, Section 9.7, Bristol: Adam Hilger Ltd, 1980: 107-8
12. 12 Bristow SE, Neal DE. Ambulatory urodynamics. Br J Urol 1996; 77: 333-8
13. 13 Van Waalwik van Doorn ESC, Remmers A, Janknegt RA. Conventional and extramural ambulatory testing of the lower urinary tract in female volunteers. J Urol 1992; 47: 1319-26