Ambulatory urodynamics: Do they help clinical management?

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 316-319

  Gorton, Emma ^a   Stanton, Stuart ^b  

^a ROYAL SURREY COUNTY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; OXYBUTYNIN; TRIMETHOPRIM;

ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; CYSTOMETRY; DETRUSOR DYSSYNERGIA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; URINE INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

AMBULATORY CARE; CHOLINERGIC AGONISTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0034098216     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13224.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bates CP, Whiteside CG, Turner-Warwick R. Synchronous cine/pressure flow/cystourethrography with special reference to stress and urge incontinence. Synchronous cine/pressure flow/cystourethrography with special reference to stress and urge incontinence 1970; 42: 714–723.
2. Jarvis GJ, Hall S, Stamp S, Millar DR, Johnson A. An assessment of urodynamic examination in incontinent women. An assessment of urodynamic examination in incontinent women 1980; 87: 893–896.
3. van Waalwijk van Doorn ESC, Remmers A, Janknegt RA. Extramural ambulatory urodynamic monitoring during natural filling and normal daily activities: Evaluation of 100 patients. Extramural ambulatory urodynamic monitoring during natural filling and normal daily activities: Evaluation of 100 patients 1991; 146: 124–131.
4. Webb RJ, Griffiths CJ, Ramsden PD, Neal DE. Ambulatory monitoring of bladder pressure in low compliance neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Ambulatory monitoring of bladder pressure in low compliance neurogenic bladder dysfunction 1992; 148: 1477–1481.
5. Porru D, Usai F. Standard and extramural ambulatory urodynamic investigation for the diagnosis of detrusor instability-correlated incontinence and micturition disorders. Standard and extramural ambulatory urodynamic investigation for the diagnosis of detrusor instability-correlated incontinence and micturition disorders 1994; 13: 237–242.
6. Vereecken RL, Van Nuland T. Detrusor Pressure in Ambulatory versus Standard urodynamics. Detrusor Pressure in Ambulatory versus Standard urodynamics 1998; 17: 129–133.
7. van Waalwijk van Doorn ES, Remmers A, Janknegt RA, Conventional and extramural ambulatory urodynamic testing of the lower urinary tract in female volunteers. Conventional and extramural ambulatory urodynamic testing of the lower urinary tract in female volunteers 1992; 147: 1319, 1325.
8. Robertson AS, Griffiths CJ, Ramsden PD, Neal DE. Bladder function in healthy volunteers: ambulatory monitoring and conventional urodynamic studies. Br J Urol 1994; 73: 242–249.
9. Heslington K, Hilton P. Ambulatory monitoring and conventional cystometry in asymptomatic female volunteers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 434–441.
10. Awad SA, Al-Zahrani HM, Gajewski JB, Bourque-Kehoe AA. Long-term results and complications of augmentation ileocystoplasty for idiopathic urge incontinence in women. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 569–573.
11. Salvatore S, Khullar V, Anders K, Cardozo LD. Reducing artefacts in ambulatory urodynamics. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 211–214.
12. Brown K, Hilton P. Ambulatory monitoring. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 1997; 8: 369–376.
13. Salvatore S, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Anders K, Digesu GA, Bidmead J. Ambulatory urodynamics: Do we need it Neurourol Urodyn 1999; 18: 257–258.
14. Swithinbank LV, James M, Shepherd A, Abrams P. Role of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring in clinical practice. Neurourol Urodyn 1999; 18: 215–222.
15. Abrams P. Lower urinary tract symptoms in women: who to investigate and how. Br J Urol 1997; 80: 43–48.
16. McDonald IG, Daly J, Jelinek VM, Panetta F, Gutman. Opening Pandora's box: the unpredictability of reassurance by a normal test result. BMJ 1996; 313: 329–332.