Occasion setting by drug states: Functional equivalence following similar training history

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 195, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 260-270

  Palmatier, Matthew I ^a   Bevins, Rick A ^b  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Addictions; Benzodiazepine; Conditioning; Dopamine; Nicotinic; Occasion setting; Pavlovian

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE; CYTIDINE DIPHOSPHATE; NICOTINE; SUCROSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; DRUG DISCRIMINATION; MALE; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REWARD; TRAINING;

AMPHETAMINE; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; INJECTIONS, INTRAPERITONEAL; MALE; NICOTINE; NICOTINIC AGONISTS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REWARD; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; SUCROSE;

EID: 54249129790     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Appel J.B., West W.B., Rolandi W.G., Alici T., and Pechersky K. Increasing the selectivity of drug discrimination procedures. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64 (1999) 353-358
2. Balfour D.J., Wright A.E., Benwell M.E., and Birrel C.E. The putative role of extra-synaptic mesolimbic dopamine in the neurobiology of nicotine dependence. Behav Brain Res 113 (2000) 73-83
3. Bardo M.T., Bevins R.A., Klebaur J.E., Crooks P.A., and Dwoskin L.P. (-)-Nornicotine partially substitutes for (+)-amphetamine in a drug discrimination paradigm in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 58 4 (1997) 1083-1087
4. Besheer J., Palmatier M.I., Metschke D.M., and Bevins R.A. Nicotine as a signal for the presence or absence of sucrose reward: a Pavlovian drug appetitive conditioning preparation in rats. Psychopharmacology 172 (2004) 108-117
5. Bevins R., Penrod R., and Reichel C. Nicotine does not produce state-dependent effects on learning in a Pavlovian appetitive goal-tracking task with rats. Behav Brain Res 177 (2007) 134-141
6. Bevins R.A., and Palmatier M.I. Extending the role of associative learning processes in nicotine addiction. Behav Cog Neurosci Rev 3 (2004) 143-158
7. Boakes R.A. Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In: Davis H., and Hurwitz H. (Eds). Operant-Pavlovian interactions (1977), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey 67-101
8. Bonardi C. Occasion setting is specific to the CS-US association. Learn Motiv 38 3 (2007) 208-228
9. Bonardi C., Rey V., Richmond M., and Hall G. Acquired equivalence of cues in pigeon autoshaping: effects of training with common consequences and with common antecedents. Anim Learn Behav 21 4 (1993) 369-376
10. Bouton M.E., and King D.A. Effect of context on performance to conditioned stimuli with mixed histories of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. J Exp Psych: Anim Behav Process 12 (1983) 4-15
11. Bouton M.E., and Nelson J.B. Mechanisms of feature-positive and feature-negative discrimination learning in an appetitive conditioning paradigm (1998), Schmajuk, Nestor A.
12. Brooks D.C., and Bouton M.E. A retrieval cue for extinction attenuates response recovery (renewal) caused by a return to the conditioning context. J Exp Psych: Anim Behav Process 20 (1994) 366-379
13. Brooks D.C., Hale B., Nelson J.B., and Bouton M.E. Reinstatement after counterconditioning. Anim Learn Behav 23 4 (1995) 383-390
14. Carrigan P.F., Benedict J.O., and Ayres J.J. A comparison of lever press and head-poke discriminated Sidman avoidance. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 4 (1972) 301-303
15. Chance W.T., Murfin D., Krynock G.M., and Rosecrans J.A. A description of the nicotine stimulus and tests of its generalization to amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 55 1 (1977) 19-26
16. Cleland G.G., and Davey G.C. Autoshaping in the rat: the effects of localizable visual and auditory signals for food. J Exp Anal Behav 40 (1983) 47-56
17. Conklin C.A., and Tiffany S.T. Applying extinction research and theory to cue-exposure addiction treatments. Addiction 97 (2002) 155-167
18. Connelly J.F., Connelly J.M., and Phifer R. Disruption of state-dependent learning (memory retrieval) by emotionally-important stimuli. Psychopharmacologia 41 (1975) 139-143
19. DiChiara G. Role of dopamine in the behavioural actions of nicotine related to addiction. Eur J Pharmacol 393 (2000) 295-314
20. Farwell B.J., and Ayres J.J. Stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relations in the control of conditioned appetitive headpoking (goal tracking) in rats. Learn Motiv 10 (1979) 295-312
21. Hall G. Reasoning and associative learning (1990), Blackman, D.E.
22. Heishman S.J., and Henningfield J.E. Discriminative stimulus effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and diazepam in humans. Psychopharmacology 103 (1991) 436-442
23. Jarbe T.U., and Lamb R.J. Effects of lithium dose (UCS) on the acquisition and extinction of a discriminated morphine aversion: tests with morphine and delta9-THC. Behav Pharmacol 10 (1999) 349-358
24. Koob G.F., and LeMoal M. Plasticity of reward neurocircuitry and the 'dark side' of drug addiction. Nat Neurosci 8 (2001) 1442-1444
25. Martin G.M., Gans M., and van der Kooy D. Discriminative properties of morphine that modulate associations between tastes and lithium chloride. J Exp Psych: Anim Behav Process 16 (1990) 56-68
26. Palmatier M.I., and Bevins R.A. Facilitation by drug states does not depend on acquired excitatory strength. Behav Brain Res 176 2 (2007) 292-301
27. Palmatier M.I., Peterson J.L., Wilkinson J.L., and Bevins R.A. Nicotine serves as a feature-positive modulator of Pavlovian appetitive conditioning in rats. Behav Pharmacol 15 (2004) 183-194
28. Palmatier M.I., Wilkinson J.L., Metschke D.M., and Bevins R.A. Stimulus properties of nicotine, amphetamine, and chlordiazepoxide as positive features in a Pavlovian appetitive discrimination task in rats. Neuropsychopharmacol 30 (2005) 731-741
29. Parker B.K., Schaal D.W., and Miller M. Drug discrimination using a Pavlovian conditional discrimination paradigm in pigeons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 49 4 (1994) 955-960
30. Quertemont E. Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol with a conditioned taste aversion procedure: lack of acetaldehyde substitution. Behav Pharmacol 14 (2003) 343-350
31. Revusky S., Coombes S., and Pohl R.W. Drug states as discriminative stimuli in a flavor-aversion learning experiment. J Comp Physiol Psychol 96 (1982) 200-211
32. Rijnders H.J., Jarbe T.U., and Slangen J.L. Extinction and reacquisition of differential responding in rats trained to discriminate between chlordiazepoxide and saline. Psychopharmacology 102 (1990) 404-410
33. Robinson T.E., and Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 18 (1993) 247-291
34. Skinner D.M. Modulation of taste aversions by a pentobarbital drug state: an assessment of its transfer properties. Learn Motiv 31 (2000) 381-401
35. Skinner D.M., Goddard M.J., and Holland P.C. What can nontraditional features tell us about conditioning and occasion setting?. In: Holland P., and Schmajuk N. (Eds). Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals (1998), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 113-124
36. Stolerman I.P., Chandler C.J., Garcha H.S., and Newton J.M. Selective antagonism of behavioural effects of nicotine by dihydro-beta-erythroidine in rats. Psychopharmacology 129 (1997) 390-397
37. Wang J., Fang Q., Liu Z., and Lu L. Region-specific effects of brain corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 blockade on footshock-stress- or drug-priming-induced reinstatement of morphine conditioned place preference in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 185 1 (2006) 19-28
38. Westbrook R.F., Iordanova M., McNally G., Richardson R., and Harris J.A. Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus: two roles for context. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process 28 1 (2002) 97-110