Nicotine does not produce state-dependent effects on learning in a Pavlovian appetitive goal tracking task with rats

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 177, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 134-141

  Bevins, Rick A ^a   Penrod, Rachel D ^a   Reichel, Carmela M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Classical conditioning; Interoceptive cue; Learning; Memory; Nicotinic acetylcholine; Pharmacological conditioned stimulus; Recall; Smoking; Tobacco

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SUCROSE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; APPETITE; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; GOAL ATTAINMENT; MALE; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SMOKING; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; APPETITE; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NICOTINE; NICOTINIC AGONISTS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENTS;

EID: 33845969198     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alessi S.M., Roll J.M., Reilly M.P., and Johanson C.-E. Establishment of a diazepam preference in human volunteers following differential-conditioning history of placebo versus diazepam choice. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 10 (2002) 77-83
2. Berger B., and Stein L. Asymmetrical dissociation of learning between scopolamine and Wy4036, a new benzodiazepine tranquilizer. Psychopharmacologia 14 (1964) 351-358
3. Besheer J., and Bevins R.A. Acetylcholine. II. Nicotinic receptors. In: Riedel G., and Platt B. (Eds). Memories are made of these: from messenger to molecules (2004), Landes Bioscience, Texas 113-124
4. Besheer J., Palmatier M.I., Metschke D.M., and Bevins R.A. Nicotine as a signal for the presence or absence of sucrose reward: a Pavlovian drug appetitive conditioning preparation in rats. Psychopharmacology 172 (2004) 108-117
5. Bevins R.A., McPhee J.E., Rauhut A.S., and Ayres J.J.B. Converging evidence for one-trial context fear conditioning with an immediate shock: importance of shock potency. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 23 (1997) 312-324
6. Bevins R.A., and Palmatier M.I. Nicotine-conditioned locomotor sensitization in rats: assessment of the US-preexposure effect. Behav Brain Res 143 (2003) 65-74
7. Bevins R.A., and Palmatier M.I. Extending the role of associative learning processes in nicotine addiction. Behav Cog Neuro Rev 3 (2004) 143-158
8. Boakes R.A. Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In: Davis H., and Hurwitz H.M.B. (Eds). Operant-pavlovian interactions (1977), New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 67-101
9. Clements K., Glautier S., Stolerman I.P., White J.-A., and Taylor C. Classical conditioning in humans: nicotine as CS and alcohol as US. Human Psychopharm 11 (1996) 85-95
10. Colpaert F.C., and Koek W. Empirical evidence that the state dependence and drug discrimination paradigms can generate different outcomes. Psychopharmacology 120 (1995) 272-279
11. Cunningham C.L. Alcohol as a cue for extinction: state dependency produced by conditioned inhibition. Anim Learn Behav 7 (1979) 45-52
12. Estes W.K. Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychol Rev 57 (1950) 94-107
13. Fanselow M.S. Learning theory and neuropsychology: configuring their disparate elements in the hippocampus. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process 25 (1999) 275-283
14. Farwell B.J., and Ayres J.J.B. Stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relations in the control of conditioned appetitive headpoking ("goal tracking") in rats. Learn Motiv 10 (1979) 295-312
15. Girden E., and Culler E. Conditioned responses in curarized striate muscle in dogs. Comp Psychol 23 (1937) 261-274
16. Girden E. The dissociation of blood pressure conditioned responses under erythroidine. J Exp Psychol 31 (1942) 219-231
17. Harris J.A., and Westbrook R.F. Contextual control over the expression of fear in rats conditioned under a benzodiazepine. Psychopharmacology 156 (2001) 92-97
18. Hill H.E., Jones B.E., and Bell E.C. State-dependent control of discrimination by morphine and pentobarbital. Psychopharmacologia 22 (1971) 305-313
19. Holloway F.A. State-dependent effects of ethanol on active and passive avoidance learning. Psychopharmacologia 25 (1972) 238-261
20. Levin E.D., and Simon B.B. Nicotinic acetylcholine involvement in cognitive function in animals. Psychopharmacology 138 (1998) 217-230
21. Lowe G. State-dependent learning effects with a combination of alcohol and nicotine. Psychopharmacology 89 (1986) 105-107
22. National research council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (1996), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
23. Nielson H.C., DeWitt J.R., and Gill J.H. Some failures of the drug discrimination hypothesis of state-dependent learning. In: Colpaert F.C., and Rosecrans J.A. (Eds). Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. (1978), Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam 423-443
24. Overton D.A. State-dependent or "dissociated" learning produced with pentobarbital. J Comp Physiol Psychol 57 (1964) 3-12
25. Overton D.A. State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia 10 (1966) 6-31
26. Overton D.A. Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning. Fed Proc 33 (1974) 1800-1813
27. Overton D.A. State dependent learning and drug discrimination. In: Iverson L.L. (Ed). Handbook of psychopharmacology vol. 18 (1984), Plenum Press, New York 59-127
28. Pavlov I.P. Conditioned reflexes (1927), Oxford University Press, London
29. Peters R., and McGee R. Cigarette smoking and state-dependent memory. Psychopharmacology 76 (1982) 232-235
30. Siegel R.K., and Jarvik M.E. Evidence for state dependent learning with mescaline in a passive avoidance task. Psychon Sci 25 (1971) 260-261
31. Sitharthan T., Sitharthan G., Hough M.J., and Kavanagh D.J. Cue exposure in moderation drinking: a comparison with cognitive-behavior therapy. J Consul Clinic Psychol 65 (1997) 878-882
32. Spear N.E., and Riccio D.C. Memory: phenomena and principles (1994), Allyn and Bacon, Boston
33. Swanson J.M., and Kinsbourne M. The 2 × 2 design reconsidered: limitations imposed by the statistical model. In: Colpaert F.C., and Rosecrans J.A. (Eds). Stimulus properties of drugs: ten years of progress. (1978), Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam 467-480
34. Troisi J.R. Spontaneous recovery during, but not following, extinction of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats: reinstatement of stimulus control. Psychol Rec 53 (2003) 579-592
35. Warburton D.M., Wesnes K., Shergold K., and James M. Facilitation of learning and state dependency with nicotine. Psychopharmacology 89 (1986) 55-59
36. Wilkinson J.L., Murray J.E., Li C., Wiltgen S.M., Penrod R.D., Berg S.A., et al. Interoceptive Pavlovian conditioning with nicotine as the conditional stimulus varies as a function of number of conditioning trials and unpaired sucrose deliveries. Behav Pharmacol 17 (2006) 161-172
37. Wright D.C. Differentiating stimulus and storage hypotheses of state-dependent learning. Fed Proc 33 (1974) 1797-1799