Lexical influences on speech perception: A Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates

NeuroImage

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 614-623

  Gow Jr , David W ^a,b,c   Segawa, Jennifer A ^a   Ahlfors, Seppo P ^a,c   Lin, Fa Hsuan ^a,d  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CINGULATE GYRUS; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 54149117431     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Cont. 19 (1974) 716-723
2. Bentin S., McCarthy G., and Wood C.C. Event-related potential lexical decision and semantic processing. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 60 (1985) 342-355
3. Bernasconi C., and König P. On the directionality of cortical interactions studied by structural analysis of electrophysiological recordings. Biol. Cybern. 81 (1999) 1999-210
4. Blumstein S.E., Myers E.B., and Rissman J. The perception of voice onset time: an fMRI investigation of phonetic category structure. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17 (2005) 1353-1366
5. Brovelli A., Ding M., Ledberg A., Chen Y., Nakamura R., and Bressler S.L. Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directionality influences revealed by Granger causality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 9849-9854
6. Burton M.W., Small S.L., and Blumstein S.E. The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 (2000) 679-709
7. Ciesielski K.T., Hämäläinen M., Lesnik P.G., Geller D.A., and Ahlfors S.P. Increased MEG activation in OCD reflects a compensatory mechanism specific to the phase of a visual working memory task. NeuroImage 24 (2005) 1180-1191
8. Dale A.M., Liu A.K., Fischl B., Buckner R.L., Belliveau J., Lewine J., and Halgren E. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26 (2000) 55-67
9. Dale A.M., Fischl B., and Sereno M.I. Cortical surface-based analysis I: segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage 9 (1999) 179-194
10. Dale A.M., and Sereno M.I. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5 (1993) 162-176
11. Davis M.H., Johnsrude I.S., Hervais-Adelman A., Taylor K., and McGettigan C. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134 (2005) 222-241
12. Dennett D.C. "Filling in" versus finding out. In: Pick H.L., Van den Broek P., and Knill D.C. (Eds). Cognition, Conception, and Methodological Issues (1992), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 33-49
13. Embick D., Hackl M., Schaeffer J., Kelepir M., and Marantz A. A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. Cogn. Brain Res. 9 (2001) 137-146
14. Fischl B., Liu A., and Dale A.M. Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 20 (2001) 70-80
15. Fischl B., Sereno M.I., and Dale A.M. Cortical surface-based analysis II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. NeuroImage 9 (1999) 195-207
16. Fischl B., Sereno M.I., Tootell R.B., and Dale A.M. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8 (1999) 272-284
17. Ganong W.F. Phonetic categorization in auditory word recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. 6 (1980) 110-125
18. Goodglass H., and Kaplan E. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. 2nd ed. (1983), Lea & Febige, Philadelphia
19. Granger C.W.J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37 (1969) 424-438
20. Grossberg S. Resonant neural dynamics of speech perception. J. Phonetics 31 (2003) 423-445
21. Hämäläinen M.A., and Ilmoniemi R.J. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Med. Biol. Eng. Comp. 32 (1994) 35-42
22. Hämäläinen M.J., and Sarvas J. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. BME-36 (1989) 165-171
23. Helenius P., Salmelin R., Service E., and Connolly J.F. Distinct time courses of word and context comprehension in the left temporal cortex. Brain 21 (1998) 1133-1142
24. Hernandez L., Badre D., Noll D., and Jonides J. Temporal sensitivity of event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 17 (2002) 1018-1026
25. Hesse W., Möller E., Arnold M., and Schack B. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. J. Neurosci. Methods 124 (2003) 27-44
26. Hickok G., and Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8 (2007) 393-402
27. Holcomb P.J., and Neville H.J. Auditory and visual semantic processing in lexical decision: a comparison using event-related potentials. Lang. Cogn. Processes 5 (1990) 281-312
28. Joliot M., Ribary U., and Linas R. Human oscillatory brain activity near 40 Hz coexists with cognitive temporal binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91 (1994) 11748-11751
29. Kamínski M., Ding M., Truccolo W.A., and Bressler S.L. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol. Cybern. 85 (2001) 145-157
30. Kutas M., and Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207 (1980) 203-204
31. Lachaux J.-P., Rodriguez E., Martinerie J., and Varela F. Measuring phase-synchrony in brain signals. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8 (1999) 194-208
32. Liang H., Ding M., Nakamura R., and Bressler S.L. Causal influences in primate cerebral cortex during visual pattern discrimination. NeuroReport 11 (2000) 2875-2880
33. Lin F.-H., Belliveau J.W., Dale A.M., and Hämäläinen M. Distributed current estimates with cortical orientation constraints. Hum. Brain Mapp. 27 (2006) 1-13
34. Lin F.-H., Witzel T., Ahlfors S.P., Stufflebeam S.M., Belliveau J.W., and Hämäläinen M.A. Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates. NeuroImage 31 (2006) 160-171
35. Lin F.-H., Witzel T., Hämäläinen M.A., Dale A.M., Belliveau J.W., and Stufflebeam S. Spectral spatiotemporal imaging of cortical oscillations and interactions in the human brain. NeuroImage 23 (2004) 582-595
36. Liu A.K., Dale A.M., and Belliveau J.W. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Hum. Brain Mapp. 16 (2002) 47-62
37. McClelland J.L., and Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cogn. Psychol. 18 (1986) 1-86
38. Myers E.B., and Blumstein S.E. The neural basis of the lexical effect: an fMRI investigation. Cereb. Cortex 18 (2008) 278-288
39. Näätänen R. The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 1-21
40. Norris D., McQueen J.M., and Cutler A. Merging information in speech perception: feedback is never necessary. Behav. Brain Sci. 23 (2000) 299-370
41. Norris D., and Wise R. The study of prelexical and lexical processes in comprehension: psycholinguistics and functional neuroimaging. In: Gazzaniga M.S. (Ed). The new cognitive sciences (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 867
42. Oostendorp T.F., and van Oosterom A. Source parameter estimation in inhomogeneous volume conductors of arbitrary shape. IEEE Tran. Biomed. Eng. 36 (1989) 382-391
43. O'Rourke T.B., and Holcomb P.J. Electrophysiological evidence for the efficiency of spoken word processing. Biol. Psychol. 60 (2002) 121-150
44. Pessoa L., Thompson E., and Noë E. Finding out about filling: a guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception. Behav. Brain Sci. 21 (1998) 723-802
45. Petersen S.E., Fox T., Posner M.I., Mintun M.E., and Raichle P.E. Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature 331 (1988) 585-589
46. Poeppel D. Pure word deafness and bilateral processing of the speech code. Cognit. Sci. 2 (2001) 679-693
47. Prabhakaran R., Blumstein S.E., Myers E.B., Huchison E., and Britton B. An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological-lexical competition. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 2209-2221
48. Pylkkänen L., Stringfellow A., and Marantz A. Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: an MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density. Brain Lang. 81 (2002) 666-678
49. Raettig T., and Kotz S. Auditory processing of different types of pseudo-words: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 39 (2007) 1420-1428
50. Roebroek A., Formisano E., and Goebel R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. NeuroImage 25 (2005) 230-242
51. Samuel A.G., and Pitt M.A. Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation. J. Mem. Lang. 48 (2003) 416-434
52. Sanai N., Mirzadeh Z., and Berger M.S. Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N. Engl. J. Med. 358 (2008) 18-27
53. Schwartz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 5 (1978) 461-464
54. Sekiguchi T., Koyama S., and Kakigi R. The effect of word repetition on evoked magnetic responses in the human brain. Jpn. Psychol. Res., 42 (2000) 3-14
55. Segonne F., Dale A.M., Busa E., Glessner M., Salat D., Hahn H.K., and Fischl B. A hybrid approach to the skull-stripping problem in MRI. NeuroImage 22 (2004) 1160-1075
56. Seth A.K. Causal connectivity of evolved neural networks during behavior. Network: Comput. Neural. Syst. 16 (2005) 35-54
57. Supp G.G., Schlögl A., Trujillo-Barreto N., Müller M.M., and Gruber T. Directed cortical information flow during human object recognition: analyzing EEG gamma band responses in the brain's source space. PLoS ONE 2 (2007) e684
58. Tallon-Baudry C., and Bertrand O. Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3 (1999) 151-162
59. Tallon-Baudry C., Bertrand O., Delpuech C., and Pernier J. Oscillatory g-band activity (30-70 Hz) induced by a visual search task in human. J. Neurosci. 17 (1997) 722-734
60. Warren R.M. Restoration of missing speech sounds. Science 167 (1970) 392-393
61. Wehner D., Ahlfors S.P., and Mody M. The influence of semantic processing on phonological decisions in children and adults: a magnetoencephalography (MEG) study. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 50 (2007) 716-731
62. Zatorre R., Evans A., Meyer E., and Gjedde A. Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science 256 (1992) 846-849
63. Zatorre R.J., Meyer E., Gjedde A., and Evans A. PET studies of phonetic processing of speech: review, replication, and reanalysis. Cereb. Cortex 6 (1996) 21-30