Causal connectivity of evolved neural networks during behavior

Network: Computation in Neural Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 35-54

  Seth, Anil ^a  

^a NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Causality; Embodiment; Granger causality; Graph theory

Indexed keywords

AGING; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGY;

AGING; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR; CAUSALITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURONAL PLASTICITY;

EID: 33745595378     PISSN: 0954898X     EISSN: 13616536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09548980500238756     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ballard DH. 1991. Animate vision. Artificial Intelligence 48:57-86.
2. Bernasconi C, Konig P. 1999. On the directionality of cortical interactions studied by structural analysis of electrophysiological recordings. Biol Cybern 81:199-210.
3. Bollobás B. 1985. Random graphs. London: Academic Press.
4. Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC. 1994. Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. 3rd ed. Englewood Clifs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Brovelli A, Ding M, Ledberg A, Chen Y, Nakamura R, Bressler S. 2004. Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: Directional influences revealed by Granger causality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101:9849-9854.
6. Chen Y, Rangarajan G, Feng J, Ding M. 2004. Analyzing multiple nonlinear time series with extended Granger causality. Phys Lett A 324:26-35.
7. Clark A. 1997. Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Draper NR, Smith H. 1998. Applied regression analysis: 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
9. Edelman GM. 1987. Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.
10. Faloutsos M, Faloutsos P, Faloutsos C. 1999. On power-law relationships of the internet topology. Computer Communications Review 29:251-262.
11. Fletcher JA, Zwick M, Bedau MA. 1998. Effect of environmental texture on evolutionary adaptation. In: Adami C, Belew RK, Kitano H, and Taylor CE, editors. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Life, Cambridge: MIT Press. pp 189-199.
12. Floreano D, Kato T, Marocco D, Sauser E. 2004. Coevolution of active vision and feature selection. Biol Cybern 90:218-228.
13. Freedman EG, Sparks DL. 2000. Coordination of the eyes and head: Movement kinematics. Exp Brain Res 131:22-32.
14. Friewald WA, Valdes P, Bosch J, Biscay R, Jimenez JC, Rodriguez LM, Rodriguez V, Kreiter AK, Singer W. 1999. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. J Neurosci Methods 94:105-119.
15. Geweke J. 1982. Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J Am Stat Assoc 77:304-13.
16. Godfrey-Smith P. 1996. Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Granger CWJ. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424-438.
18. Haavelmo T. 1943. The statistical implications of a system of simultaneous equations. Econometrica 11:1-12.
19. Hamilton, JD. 1994 Time series analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20. Hesse W, Möller E, Arnold M, Schack B. 2003. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. J Neurosci Methods 124:27-44.
21. Izhikevich E. 2003. Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14:1569-1572.
22. Kaminski M, Ding M, Truccolo WA, Bressler SL. 2001. Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol Cybern 85:145-157.
23. Keinan A, Sandbank B, Hilgetag CC, Meilijson I, Ruppin E. 2004. Fair attribution of functional contribution in artificial and biological networks. Neural Comput 16:1887-1915.
24. Kötter R, Stephan K. 2003. Network participation indices: Characterizing component roles for information processing in networks. Neural Netw 16:1261-1275.
25. Kobatake E, Wang G, Tanaka K. 1998. Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol 80(1):324-330.
26. Krichmar JL, Edelman GM. 2002. Machine psychology: Autonomous behavior, perceptual categorization and conditioning in a brain-based device. Cereb Cortex 12(8):818-830.
27. Liang H, Ding M, Nakamura R, Bressler SL. 2000. Causal influences in primate cerebral cortex during visual pattern discrimination. Neuroreport 11(13):2875-2880.
28. McIntosh AR, Grady CL, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV, Rapoport SI, Horwitz B. 1994. Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET. J Neurosci 14:655-666.
29. McIntosh AR, Gonzalez-Lima F. 1994. Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2:2-22.
30. Newman MEJ. 2001. Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific coauthorship networks. Phys Rev E 64:016131. cond-mat/0011144.
31. Pearl J. 1999. Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Schwartz G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 5:461-464.
33. Seth, AK. 1998. The evolution of complexity and the value of variability. In: Adami C, Belew RK, Kitano H, Taylor CE, editors, Artificial Life VI: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, Cambridge: MIT Press. pp 209-221.
34. Seth AK. 2000. On the relations between behaviour, mechanism, and environment: Explorations in artificial evolution. PhD thesis, University of Sussex.
35. Seth AK, Edelman GM. 2004a. Environment and behavior influence the complexity of evolved neural networks. Adaptive Behavior 12:5-21.
36. Seth AK, Edelman GM. 2004b. Theoretical neuroanatomy: Analyzing the structure, dynamics and function of neuronal networks. In: Ben Naim E, Fraunfelder H, Toroczkai Z, editors. Complex networks, Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 487-518.
37. Seth AK, McKinstry JL, Edelman GM, Krichmar JL. 2004. Visual binding through reentrant connectivity and dynamic synchronization in a brain-based device. Cereb Cortex 14:1185-1199.
38. Shibata T, Vijayakumar S, Conradt J, Schaal S. 2001. Biomimetic oculomotor control. Adaptive Behavior 9:189-209.
39. Sporns O, Tononi G, Edelman GM. 2000. Theoretical neuroanatomy: Relating anatomical and functional connectivity in graphs and cortical connection matrices. Cereb Cortex 10:127-141.
40. Tononi G, Sporns O, Edelman GM. 1994. A measure for brain complexity: Relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA) 91:5033-5037.
41. Tononi G, Sporns O. 2003. Measuring information integration. BMC Neurosci 4:31.
42. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. 1998. Collective dynamics of 'small world' networks. Nature 393:440-442.
43. Wiener N. 1956. The theory of prediction. In: Beckenbach E, editor. Modern mathematics for engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Yook SH, Oltvai ZN, Barabàsi, A-L. 2004. Functional and topological characterization of protein interaction networks. Proteomics 4:928-942.