My space or your space? Towards a measure of joint accessibility

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 331-342

  Neutens, Tijs ^a   Schwanen, Tim ^b   Witlox, Frank ^a   Maeyer, Philippe De ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Joint accessibility; Joint activity participation; Space time accessibility; Time geography

Indexed keywords

SENSOR NETWORKS;

JOINT ACCESSIBILITY; JOINT ACTIVITY PARTICIPATION; SPACE-TIME ACCESSIBILITY; TIME-GEOGRAPHY;

NETWORK PROTOCOLS;

ACCESSIBILITY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MODELING; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 53949119524     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ashiru O., Polak J.W., and Noland R.B. Space-time user benefit and utility accessibility measures for individual activity schedules. Transportation Research Record 1845 (2003) 62-73
2. Becker G.S. A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal 75 299 (1965) 493-517
3. Beckmann M.J., Golob T.F., and Zahavi Y. Travel probability fields and urban spatial structure: 1. Theory. Environment and Planning A 15 5 (1983) 593-606
4. Ben-Akiva M., and Lerman S.R. Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility. In: Hensher D.A., and Stopher P.R. (Eds). Behavioural travel modelling (1979), Croom-Helm, London 654-679
5. Burns L.D. Transportation, temporal and spatial components of accessibility (1979), Lexington Books, Lexington
6. Carlstein T. Time resources, society and ecology: On the capacity for human interaction in space and time - Part 1: Preindustrial societies (1980), Department of Geography, The Royal University of Lund
7. Carrasco J.A., and Miller E.J. Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: A social network approach. Transportation 33 5 (2006) 463-480
8. Carrasco, J. A., Hogan, B., Wellman, B., & Miller, E. J. (in press). Collecting social network data to study social activity-travel behaviour: An egocentric approach. Environment and Planning B.
9. Cullen I., and Godson V. Urban networks: The structure of activity patterns. Progress in Planning 4 1 (1975) 1-96
10. Dijst M., De Jong T., and Ritsema van Eck J. Opportunities for transport mode change: An exploration of a disaggregated approach. Environment and Planning B 29 3 (2002) 413-430
11. Ettema D., Bastin F., Polak J., and Ashiru O. Modelling the joint choice of activity timing and duration. Transportation Research A 41 9 (2007) 827-841
12. Ettema D., and Timmermans H. Space-time accessibility under conditions of uncertain travel times: Theory and numerical simulations. Geographical Analysis 39 2 (2007) 217-240
13. Gliebe J.P., and Koppelman F.S. A model of joint activity participation between household members. Transportation 30 1 (2002) 49-72
14. Golob T.F., and McNally M.G. A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads. Transportation Research B 31 3 (1997) 177-194
15. Hägerstrand T. What about people in regional science?. Papers of the Regional Science Association 24 1 (1970) 7-21
16. Hägerstrand T. The domain of human geography. In: Chorley R.J. (Ed). Directions in geography (1973), Methuen, London 67-87
17. Handy S., and Niemeier D. Measuring accessibility; An exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A 29 7 (1997) 1175-1194
18. Hansen W.G. How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Planning Institute 25 2 (1959) 73-76
19. Hanson S., and Schwab M. Accessibility and intraurban travel. Environment and Planning A 19 6 (1987) 735-748
20. Harvey A.S., and Taylor M.E. Activity settings and travel behaviour: A social contact perspective. Transportation 27 1 (2000) 53-73
21. Hsu C.-I., and Hsieh Y.-P. Travel and activity choices based on an individual accessibility model. Papers in Regional Science 83 2 (2004) 387-406
22. Forer P., and Huisman O. Space, time and sequencing: Substitution at the physical/virtual interface. In: Janelle D.G., and Hodge D.C. (Eds). Information place and cyberspace: Issues in accessibility (2000), Springer, Berlin 73-90
23. Jones P.M., Dix M.C., Clarke M.I., and Heggie I.G. Understanding travel behaviour (1983), Aldershot, Gower
24. Kim H.M., and Kwan M.-P. Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration. Journal of Geographical Systems 5 1 (2003) 71-91
25. Kitamura R., Akiyama T., Yamamoto T., and Golob T.F. Accessibility in a metropolis: Toward a better understanding of land use and travel. Transportation Research Record 1780 (2001) 64-75
26. Kwan M.-P. Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis 30 2 (1998) 191-216
27. Kwan M.-P. Gender and individual access to opportunities: A study of space-time measures. The Professional Geographer 51 2 (1999) 210-227
28. Kwan M.-P., Murray A.T., O'Kelly M.E., and Tiefelsdorf M. Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications. Journal of Geographical Systems 5 1 (2003) 129-138
29. Kwan M.-P., and Weber J. Individual accessibility revisited: Implications for geographical analysis in the twenty-first century. Geographical Analysis 35 4 (2003) 341-353
30. Larsen J., Urry J., and Axhausen K.W. Geographies of social networks: Meetings, travel and communications. Mobilities 1 2 (2006) 261-283
31. Lenntorp B. Paths in space-time environment: A time-geographic study of movement possibilities of individuals (1976), The Royal University of Lund, Department of Geography
32. Manski C.F. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 8 3 (1977) 229-254
33. Mårtensson S. On the formation of biographies in space-time environments (1979), The Royal University of Lund, Department of Geography
34. Miller H.J. Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5 3 (1991) 287-301
35. Miller H.J. Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational procedures. Geographical Analysis 31 2 (1999) 187-212
36. Miller H.J. Place-based versus people-based geographic information science. Geography Compass 1 3 (2007) 503-535
37. Morris J.M., Dumble P.L., and Wigan M.R. Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research A 13 1 (1979) 91-109
38. Morris L. The workings of the household (1990), Polity Press, Cambridge
39. Neutens T., Witlox F., Van de Weghe N., and De Maeyer Ph. Human interaction spaces under uncertainty. Transportation Research Record 2021 (2007) 28-35
40. Neutens T., Witlox F., Van de Weghe N., and De Maeyer Ph. Space-time opportunities for multiple agents: A constraint-based approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21 10 (2007) 1061-1076
41. Neutens T., Van de Weghe N., Witlox F., and De Maeyer P. A three-dimensional network-based space-time prism. Journal of Geographical Systems 10 1 (2008) 89-107
42. Ohmori N., Hirmano T., and Harata N. Meeting appointment and waiting behavior with mobile communications. Transportation Research Record 1977 (2006) 250-257
43. Páez A., and Scott D.M. Social influence on travel behavior: A simulation example of the decision to telecommute. Environment and Planning A 39 3 (2007) 503-535
44. Pirie G.H. Measuring accessibility: A review and proposal. Environment and Planning A 11 (1979) 299-312
45. Pooler J. Measuring geographical accessibility: A review of current approaches and problems in the use of population potentials. Geoforum 183 (1987) 269-289
46. Pratt G., and Hanson S. On the links between home and work: Family-household strategies in a buoyant labour market. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 15 1 (1991) 55-74
47. Schwanen, T. (in press). Coping with uncertainty through sociomaterial associations. Environment and Planning B.
48. Schwanen T., Ettema D., and Timmermans H. If you pick up the children, I'll do the groceries: Spatial differences in between-partner interactions in out of-home activities. Environment and Planning A 39 11 (2007) 2754-2773
49. Schwanen T., and Kwan M.-P. The internet, mobile phone and space-time constraints. Geoforum 39 3 (2008) 1362-1377
50. Scott D.M., and Kanaroglou P.S. An activity-episode generation model that captures interaction between household heads: Development and empirical analysis. Transportation Research B 36 10 (2002) 875-896
51. Srinivasan S., and Bhat C.R. Modeling household interactions in daily in-home and out-of-home maintenance activity participation. Transportation 32 5 (2005) 523-544
52. Srinivasan, S., & Bhat, C. R. (2006). Companionship for leisure activities: An empirical analysis using the American time use survey. Paper presented at Innovations in Travel Demand Modeling Conference, Austin, Texas, May 2006.
53. Tillberg Mattson K. Children's (in)dependent mobility and parents' chauffeuring in the town and countryside. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 93 4 (2002) 443-453
54. Wilson A.G. Retailer's profits and consumer's welfare in a spatial interaction shopping model. In: Masser I. (Ed). Theory and practice in regional science (1976), Pion, London 42-59
55. Zhang J., Timmermans H., and Borgers A. A utility-maximizing model of household time use for independent, shared and allocated activities incorporating group decision mechanisms. Transportation Research Record 1807 (2002) 1-8
56. Zhang J., Timmermans H.J.P., and Borgers A. A model of household task allocation and time use. Transportation Research B 39 1 (2005) 81-85
57. Zhang J., and Fujiwara A. Representing household allocation behavior by endogenously incorporating diverse intra-household interactions: A case study in the context of elderly couples. Transportation Research B 40 1 (2006) 54-74