A three-dimensional network-based space - Time prism

Journal of Geographical Systems

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 89-107

  Neutens, Tijs ^a   Van de Weghe, Nico ^a   Witlox, Frank ^a   De Maeyer, Philippe ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

CAD; GIS; Space timeprism; Time geography

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; ACTIVITY PATTERN; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; GIS; HUMAN ACTIVITY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 41149104415     PISSN: 14355930     EISSN: 14355949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10109-007-0057-x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adams PC (2000) Application of a CAD-based accessiblity model. In: Janelle DG, Hodge DC (eds) Information, place and cyberspace: Issues in accessibility. Berlin, Springer, pp. 217-239
2. Bridwell S (2006) Representation and analysis of activities with varying discretion. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Chicago, Illinois, USA
3. Carlstein T, Parkes D, Thrift N (1978) Timing space and spacing time, vol 2. Human activity and time geography. Edward Arnold, London
4. Carrasco JA, Miller EJ (2006) Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: A social network approach. Transportation 33:463-480
5. Dugundji ER, Walker JL (2005) Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies: An empirical example using mixed generalized extreme value models with field and panel effects. Transport Res Rec 1921:70-78
6. Forer P (1998) Geometric approaches to the nexus of time, space, and microprocess: Implementing a practical model for mundane socio-spatial systems. In: Egenhofer MJ, Golledge RG (eds) Spatial and temporal reasoning in geographic information systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 171-190
7. Hägerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Papers Region Sci Assoc 24:7-21
8. Hägerstrand T (1985) Time geography: Focus on the corporeality of man, society and environment. The science and praxis of complexity. The United Nations University, pp 193-216
9. Hall RW (1983) Travel outcome and performance: The effect of uncertainty on accessibility. Transport Res B 17B:275-290
10. Hendricks MD, Egenhofer MJ, Hornsby K (2003) Structuring a wayfinder's dynamic space-time environment. In: Kuhn W Worboys M, Timpf S (eds) Proceedings of the COSIT'03. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2855, pp 75-92. Springer, Berlin
11. Huisman O, Forer P (1998) Computational agents and urban life spaces: A preliminary realisation of the time-geography of student lifestyles. In: Abrahart RJ (ed) Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on geocomputation. Bristol, UK, CD-ROM
12. Huisman O, Forer P (1999) Student access and campus geographies: operationalising time-geography for the study of university student life. In: Roche M, McKenna M, Hesp P (eds) Proceedings of the 20th New Zealand Geographical Society Conference. Hamilton, Palmerston North New Zealand, pp 153-158
13. Janelle D (1995) Metropolitan expansion, telecommuting and transportation. In: Hanson S (ed) The Geography of Urban Transportation. Guilford, New York pp. 407-434
14. Kim HM, Kwan MP (2003) Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration. J Geogr Syst 5:71-91
15. Kitamura R, Fujii S (1998) Two computational process models of activity-travel choice. In: Gärling T, Laitila T, Westin K (eds) Theoretical foundations of travel choice modeling. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 251-279
16. Kraak M (2003) The space-time cube revisited from a geovisualisation perspective. In: Proceedings of the 21st international cartographic conference. Cartographic Renaissance. Durban, South Africa, pp. 1988-1996
17. Kwan MP (1998) Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geogr Anal 30:191-216
18. Kwan MP, Hong XD (1998) Network-based constraint-oriented choice set formation using GIS. Geogr Inform 5:139-162
19. Kwan MP (1999) Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: A study using space-time measures. Professional Geographer 51:211-227
20. Kwan MP, Weber J (2003) Individual accessibility revisited: Implications for geographical analysis in the Twenty-first century. Geogr Anal 35:341-353
21. Kwan MP (2004) GIS methods in time-geographic research: Geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler B 86:205-218
22. Lenntorp B (1976) Paths in space-time environments: A time-geographic study of the movement possibilities of individuals. Lund Studies in Geography Number 44, Royal University of Lund, Sweden
23. Lenntorp B (1978) A time-geographic simulation model of individual activity programs. In: Carlstein T, Parkes D, Thrift N (eds) Timing space and spacing time, vol 2. Human activity and time geography. Edward Arnold, London, pp. 162-180
24. Miller HJ (1991) Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. Int J Geogr Inform Syst 5:287-302
25. Miller HJ (1999) Measuring space-time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: Basic theory and computational methods. Geogr Anal 31:187-212
26. Miller HJ (2005a) A measurement theory for time geography. Geogr Anal 37:17-45
27. Miller HJ (2005b) Necessary space-time conditions for human interaction. Environment and Planning B. PlannDes 32:381-401
28. Neutens T, Witlox F, Van de Weghe N, De Maeyer P (2007a) Human interaction under uncertainty. Transport Res Rec (in press)
29. Neutens T, Witlox F, Van de Weghe N, De Maeyer P (2007b) Space-time opportunities for multiple agents: A constraint-based approach. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. doi: 10.1080/13658810601169873 (in press)
30. Páez A, Scott DM (2007) Social influence on travel behavior: A simulation example of the decision to telecommute. Environm Plann A 39:503-535
31. Pred A (1977) The choreography of existence: Comments on Hägerstrand's time-geography and its usefulness. Econ Geogr 53:207-221
32. Villoria OG (1989) An operational measure of individual accessibility for use in the study of travel-activity patterns. Ph.D thesis, Graduate School of Ohio State University, Colombus, Ohio, USA
33. Weber J, Kwan MP (2003) Evaluating the effects of geographic contexts on individual accessibility: A multilevel approach. Urban Geogr 24:647-671
34. Weibull JW (1976) An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility. Region Sci Urban Econ 6:357-379
35. Weibull JW (1980) On the numerical measurement of accessibility. Environ Plann A 12:53-67
36. Wu YH, Miller HJ (2002) Computational tools for measuring space-time accessibility within transportation networks with dynamic flow. J Transport Stat 4:1-14